Why Women Are Fleeing the Republican Party

Less likely to run anyway, women cringe at being in the party of exclusion

May 20, 2009 RSS Feed Print

My sister worked after college as a receptionist for a congressman. One day, the male chief of staff arrived for work and dumped a bag full of shoes on her desk. "Take these down to the shoe shine for me," he said, breezing by. "That's not my job," she insisted. "I won't do it." "Oh, yes, it is," the chief of staff countered. Then he looked her right in the eye and said, through clenched teeth, while standing mere steps from the Capitol of the United States, "This is not a democracy." She quit right there and walked out the door.

That was 25 years ago, and Capitol Hill still isn't a democracy. Even though a higher percentage of women than men vote and more than half of the electorate is female, Capitol Hill is still a man's world. And despite the fact that there is a female speaker of the House for the first time in history, only about 20 percent of Democratic seats in the House and Senate are held by women, and even fewer—10 percent—of GOP seats are. The truth is that women are underrepresented in our democracy. Why?

Research conducted by Brown University shows women are less likely to run for office in the first place, for reasons having to do with women's perceptions of themselves. They're less likely to perceive themselves as "qualified," less likely to be recruited to run, and less likely to express ambition for running for office. All of that rings true to me.

Another consideration is that most women are the primary caregivers in their families—whether they work full time or not, Republican or Democratic—and many are part of the "sandwich" generation, raising kids and caring for aging parents at the same time. Most members of Congress are lucky if their families accompany them to Washington; many spouses stay back in the district with the kids while the officeholder commutes back and forth weekly. No one likes to admit it, but that's a lot easier for a dad to pull off than for a mom. Granted, members of Congress do have most of the summer off, frequent recesses, and free healthcare, but that's not a situation most women see and say, "Sign me up!" The few who do sign up are far more likely to be Democrats than Republicans.

From what I can tell, there are several reasons for what Politico this week called "the minority within a minority," the shrinking number of Republican women in elected office. First, there's the math. A recent Gallup Poll shows women are more likely to identify themselves as Democrats than Republicans by a 14-point margin, 41 percent to 27 percent. Historically, women have been more likely to say they are Democrats, but the gap clearly is widening. Plus, with more voters overall identifying themselves as Democrats than Republicans, there are more Democrats from whom to recruit female candidates—and from whom to get votes.

Twenty years ago, women elected to Congress were nearly as likely to be Republican as Democratic. But that's changed as fewer and fewer women run for fewer and fewer GOP seats. Democrats hold majorities in both Houses, and the built-in advantages to incumbents have been well documented. According to pollsters Kellyanne Conway and Celinda Lake, women themselves are more likely to vote for incumbents. "Ironically, this natural bias toward re-electing incumbents is one reason many women who run for office as challengers are unsuccessful," they report. With Democrats in power, those challengers are more likely to be Republicans.

But there is also a cultural problem for Republican recruiters. Maine's Olympia Snowe, one of four GOP women currently serving in the U.S. Senate, said recently: "[We] as a party are saying we're not supporting Republican moderates. That's a terrible message to send. . . . It tells everyone else in America who might have an interest in running as a Republican moderate, they're going to have to think twice. The messages coming out of the national party are critical. They've got to be embracive and inclusive of political diversity. They can't on one hand say we're going to build a majority and then say we only want people with certain characteristics, like white males from the South. That's a concern to me."

She's right. The negative campaigns at all levels, the extremist rhetoric coming out of the right wing, the litmus-test mentality of those accusing others of being "RINOs"—Republicans in Name Only—all present a less-than-welcome message to moderate women who believe in limited but active government, a strong defense, and market-oriented solutions to the economic downturn. Right now, to most reasonable women—like my sister—the GOP isn't much of a democracy.

Tags:
female voters,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

From the results of the recent mid-term election, it seems that women AND men are actually fleeing the Democratic party. Republicans won the largest victory in over several decades. Over 60 Democrats Congressional Representatives were replaced by Republicans.

BARBBF of MN 6:34PM November 09, 2010

It's true, you can find http://www.gallup.com/poll/120839/women-likely-democrats-regardless-age.aspx and other reports that lay it out for you -- women are indeed by likely to identify as Democrat rather than Republican.

I can tell you why I no longer identify as Republican:

First and foremost, the Republican Party too often acts as if Republican Party = Conservative Christian Republican Party. I don't want a theocratic party. Theocracy is unkind to women, religious minorities, competing denominations, competing monotheisms, and gays. Theocracy is antagonistic to democracy and we live in a democratic republic.

I've grown weary of the dualism that our two party system seems to gravitate toward -- it gets people more wrapped up in belief-based identity clashes (political and/or religious) than the the topics. I've been voting Democratic, Independent and Green and would really like to have even more *viable* political parties to choose from rather than only two major parties that play into into religious dualism all too well.

I'm sick of the intellectually dishonest inflammatory hyperbole like "the hateful Left."

I don't trust the anti-intellectual warrior-on-top paradigm but appreciate a strong military.

Yesteryear's Republican Party would be today's centrist party and our entire political spectrum has shifted toward the upper right of the modern political compass (more conservative, more authoritarian). It's a dangerous path to continue, that doesn't make me anti-authority and that's a deep topic.

I'm sick of people failing to distinguish a Christian majority in the U.S. from actual theocracy. I'm tired of the Christian Nation Revisionism aimed at literally making the U.S. a theocracy.

I'm disgusted that Republicans more frequently support "marriage protection" laws/referendums -- minority civil rights are not supposed to be decided via popular vote or referendum or any bandwagon effect. The checks and balances exist, in part, for this reason. The Greeks, our American forefathers and many since have spoken both about equality (which starts with the removal of public institutions of prejudice) and 'tyranny of the majority' in the contexts of democracy, both topics all Americans should be more than well acquainted with. The threat of "mob rule" to a democracy is restrained by ensuring the rule of law protects minorities or individuals against demagoguery (appealing to prejudices) or moral panic (such as the Salem Witch Trials, Satanic Panic of the 80s and 90s).

Prejudice is not and cannot be a beacon of morality or in the interests of equality -- equality starts with the removal of public institutions of prejudice.

I also don't agree with the strict constructionism vs. living constitution hyperbole that ends up with people, Republicans more than Democrats, wanting to overturn Roe vs. Wade. I've never had an abortion, never will have an abortion, and don't like the whole polarized pro-choice vs. anti-abortion debate.

KSco of WI 5:40PM August 11, 2010

women that listen to the republicans rhetoric of Abortion is just that.they want to take away your right to choose

they claim that the reason they are against abortion is its cruel operation,thats very compelling,until you look at the truth of their claim,because once the child is born and the mother have no way to provide for it,and it sleep with its mother in homeless shelters and if you ask the repugnant republican"s

for help, you would be barking up the wrong tree, if it wasn't for the democrats do you know they would

refuse to give you assistance,yet they care so much for your child, as long as you don't ask them for anything,so think about it, all this value stuff they been selling you is a big bag of hooey, they don't care for you, or your baby, if you poor. they just care for the big Lie they have being representing!

end of story!

james I jones of NC 11:55PM May 30, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

Catholic Birth Control Fight About Healthcare, Not Just Religion

The framing of the issue of required contraceptive coverage in religious terms obscures the real question.

Rick Santorum's Sweep Means It’s Still Anybody’s Race

The GOP finds itself in the unusual position of not being sure who its nominee will eventually be.

advertisement