Bush administration figures have been accused of orchestrating the torture of prisoners. Those who favor prosecuting them say torture, a war crime, demands punishment. Those against prosecution cite the terrorism risk and say no rules were violated. Should there be trials?
Edited by Steve St. Angelo

Yes
For many people around the world, it is a sign of the decline of American moral leadership that we
By Jonathan Turley
Law professor at George Washington University; has been lead counsel on national security cases
continue to debate whether the government should prosecute those involved in the Bush torture program. Their confusion is understandable. Under our existing treaty obligations, we agreed to prosecute such crimes, and we have prosecuted others for precisely the same acts for decades. The real question should be: Should the United States violate international law to shield individuals...
No
Imagine you are an intelligence officer in 2002, when journalist Daniel Pearl is being held captive
By Clifford D. May
President of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a conservative think tank
by terrorists in Pakistan. You have an al Qaeda leader in custody. He knows who is holding Pearl and where Pearl is being held. But when you ask him to give you that information, he says: "You'll soon see Mr. Pearl. You'll see his head. You'll see his body. Of course, they will no longer be attached."
And then he smiles, pleased by his defiance, amused by your impotence....
What do you think?![]()




Reader Comments Read all comments (18)
Earthdreams of CA 2:35AM September 17, 2009
david of NC 11:31AM June 20, 2009
Wesley of AR 6:25PM May 31, 2009