Do Ailing Newspapers Need the Government to Save Them?

Check out the debate in the latest issue of U.S. News Weekly

By U.S. News Staff

April 24, 2009 RSS Feed Print

With newspapers failing, some on the left say federal help could save an industry that is key to democracy. Conservatives say the market and taxpayers have decided, and no one wants to read newspapers that are beholden to lawmakers anyway. Should the government step in to help the ailing industry? Post your thoughts below, and don't forget to check out the debate in the latest issue of U.S. News Weekly.

Previously: Does the U.S. Need More Gun Control?

Tags:
government intervention,
media,
journalism

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Good newspapers are doing okay while stupid newspapers are failing--let stupid fail: Why should public money fund stupid things that the public shuns?

Allen Martin of TX 2:39PM May 06, 2009

The "Yes" vote from Senator Cardin is based on the premise that our democracy "depends on an open and fress press..." If we had an open and free press, that might be a valid argument to some people (I am against any bailouts of any kind, but that is not the premise of my argument). However, Senator Cardin's argument loses its legs when the reader realizes that we currently do not have an open and free press. People have stopped reading the newspaper for 2 reasons: a.) the often quoted reason of a move to digital media (on-line news) and b.) people have lost faith in the ability to read unbiased and/or credible news in their local newspaper. You will not hear a certain group of people in our society talk about the second reason, but that is because they are the ones that benefit. The fact is that many newspapers are left-leaning to some degree or another, and the population that would appreciate that viewpoint is not large enough to support an entire newspaper. More often than not, it seems, we here the editor or writer's personal political viewpoints coming through the article rather than just the facts. Readers are not given the option to choose for themselves, and they are tired of it.

Jonathan of LA 10:24AM April 28, 2009

In today's economy, hearing of another company or industry possibly heading for failure is not good. But if we attempt to save a news media industry, we take on a potentially much more dangerous problem: government influence of the news message itself. Despite our best intentions, we are imperfect beings and we tend to avoid biting the hand that feeds us. On a daily, real-life level, I would be very concerned that the management of a newspaper would be reluctanct to criticize a government official who is keeping them in business.

I also think we need to be more careful when we bring the comments of an historic figure like Thomas Jefferson into the arument. I think it is a misguided and somewhat superficial interpretation of his comments to say that what he held so dear was the physical printing of the news. Considering that in his day, the country did not have the internet, TV, radio, or even electricity, the physical newspaper was the only real means of mass news reporting to the people. It is far more likely that his passion was actually in a news supply to the people that is TOTALLY UNINFLUENCED by the government. If Thomas Jefferson were alive today, I would be shocked if he would support even the remotest government involvement in the news, its reporters, or its funding. I believe his message was to guard against such dangers.

Mark J. Reiff of WI 2:25PM April 26, 2009

Cartoons

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

It’s Washington’s Birthday—Not Presidents' Day

It's time for Obama and Congress to give Presidents’ Day back to George Washington.

Cuba Is Reforming, But Not Nearly Enough

Cuban officials exaggerate the extent of reforms being enacted in the Castro brothers' Cuba.

Rick Santorum Will Spell Doom for Republicans in November

If it nominates Rick Santorum over MItt Romney, the GOP will lose the White House and elections at all other levels.

Obama's Energy Policy Isn't 'Crony Capitalism'

A majority of the energy companies who have received funds under Obama are thriving

Michigan Is a Must-Win ... For Rick Santorum

Winning in Michigan is at least as important to Santorum's campaign as it is to Romney's.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is So American

Politically speaking, the contraception controversy is a quirk of the way we pay for healthcare.

The Upside of the Racist Hoekstra Ad

In this era of nasty political rhetoric and advertising, the public will draw the line at something brazenly racist.

Barack Obama's Budget Is Even Worse Than It Looks

If Obama's budget for FY 2013 is adopted as written, the federal budget would never balance again.

advertisement

  1. Intel Official: Iranian Missiles Could Hit Nearby U.S. Targets, Europe
  2. CBO: Longest Period of High Unemployment Since Great Depression
  3. The 50 Best Careers of 2011
  4. 7 Things That Turn Off Employers During an Interview
  5. 9 Tips to Make Your Resume Stand Out