The AIG Bonuses, Sanford, McCain, Palin, and Jindal: All in a Day's News

Bloggers debate the angerfest at AIG bonuses, Sanford, Palin, McCain, and more on economic F-bombs

March 17, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Our daily look at stories and topics that are lighting up the Internets:

The AIG Anger Bandwagon

Yesterday we wrote that practically everyone and their mother was against AIG for the $175 million in bonuses its executives received. But since the news broke over the weekend, and outrage at AIG turned into a semi-populist ragefest by many in the media and on Capitol Hill, a few bloggers have changed their minds. Here's the debate that's shaping up:

CON: A number of bloggers see shameless populism at the heart of public tirades against AIG, and aren't happy with what they're observing. Let's start, for example, with Robert Stein's disapproval of Obama's "mob mentality" rhetoric on the bonuses: "It's disheartening to see Obama leading a pack of tinhorn politicians and media mouths when he should be confirming his stand against unfairness but emphasizing the positive steps he is taking for national recovery." The New York Times's Andrew Sorkin thinks that AIG needs the bonuses to keep its heavily recruited employees: "As unpalatable as it seems, taxpayers need to keep some of these brainiacs in their seats, if only to prevent them from turning against the company." Tyler Cowen agrees, drawing larger lessons from the media controversy. Lessons like this one: "This is another reason not to nationalize banks. It means politicizing every decision which ends up in the newspaper." And conservative Jonah Goldberg posts this letter from a friend on the inanity of the corporate bailout system.

PRO: Today, like yesterday, voices from the pro-pitchfork-wielding mob were much easier to hear (they were louder). Did we say pitchfork-wielding-mob? What we really meant to say was Congress. Liberal David Waldman covers the race to the hopper. Iowa GOP Sen. Charles Grassley got straight to the point—calling on AIG executives to commit hari-kari. That is, before he recanted. Perhaps Grassley was channeling last night's ranting Stephen Colbert (video). Allan Frank writes about who's really at fault for the AIG bonus scandal (spoiler: it's not AIG CEO Edward Liddy). Our very own Bonnie Erbe turns to the hypocrisy in Obama's rage: "President Obama could legitimately object to $165 million in wasteful government spending if he weren't simultaneously in the process of committing waste on a much grander scale." And former New York Gov. Elliot Spitzer writes about the real AIG scandal.

Mark Sanford, John McCain, and Little Bit of Sarah Palin

Bloggers pay special attention to two Republicans today: South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford and former GOP presidential candidate John McCain. First up: Sanford. The GOP governor requested that the stimulus money from Congress be used to pay off the debt, a proposal that was rejected by the Obama administration. In a move that's attracting further media scrutiny, Sanford sent yet another letter to the White House. Conservative Veronique de Rugy, who posts the letter here, thinks Sanford's proposal is reasonable. Conservative Jerry Taylor responds to growing comparisons between Sanford and Goldwater, attacking a much-used "big government" conservative talking point. Liberal Ali Frick thinks Sanford's tactics are a stunt, less about the real crisis in his state than about the political attention he's attracting. John McCain conducted a "Twitterview" today, to which bloggers like this one shrugged their shoulders and moved on after noting the novelty of the interview approach. Conservative Michelle Malkin wasn't passing up an opportunity to poke holes in McCain's tweets. Moving to new controversy surrounding Sarah Palin, this Portfolio piece on the Alaska governor had lots of bloggers talking today, and will, we suspect, continue to do so in the days to come.

... Meanwhile ...

U.S. OK's largest ever arms sale to India... This is what happens when spring break coincide with St. Patty's Day, and an angel's watching over you... Bobby Jindal will be in the nation's capital next week looking for green... And F-bombs go up as the economy bombs away.

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

From the UK. It is not only the USA that is suffering from the despotic actions of AIG. I had an nasty accident due to negligence last June in the UK. 60 witnesses etc. No contest. The Oil company responsible admitted liability within weeks. Since then AIG insurance ( UK ) have prevaricated and behaved abysmally, to the point of sarcasm.

A judge in my extended family said they have no reason to delay. An insurance agent friend says they are crazy, just increasing their own costs. In such a clear cut case ( she went on to say ) any sensible insurance company would pay out quickly to avoid additional costs.

I suggested a very reasonable settlement at the outset to help me and my business ( I could not walk ) This was ignored. Instead AIG London ( A Mr. Thompson ) told me to get a solicitor ( which under the circumstances was not needed, another £1000 ) Then AIG’s Mr. Thompson required me to see a specialist, even though all X rays and medical information was available free. This cost another £500

My solicitors costs keep rising as AIG seeks ever more silly excuses. My business is ruined by AIG, not the accident.

The costs keep rising, ( not just mine ) AIG prevaricates and the American Taxpayer is paying the bills. Or at least the bonuses. AIG is now living off Taxpayers money, stealing bonuses and looking after themselves financially. While not honoring their responsibilities and debts. Is that not public fraud ? So, while many people suffer ‘ AIG fills its pockets. How many others have AIG cheated while they live off American Taxpayers money. How many others are they running up bills for and expecting others to pay these bills ? Complete arrogance, stupidity and greed. Bonuses, they should be on trial for fraud on a grand scale.

I am now writing to The President Barack Obama for help.

Kevin Fitzmaurice-Brown photo-journalist UK

KEVIN FITZMAURICE-BROWN 5:16PM March 27, 2009

Sarah Palin , the good governor of Alaska and a conservative outsider of middle class family, is to only hope for americans to maintain their higher standards in the world society. Sarah Palin can be an effective president as even though she is a woman, she can stand firm against the good old boys network and corruption. She can stand along with her moral conviction, being a tough lady politician.Her popularity in Alaska remains steady. It was so sad though that she is continuously being bashed by elites coming from both republicans and deomocrats paid by those traditional politicians who desires the highest post in the american politics. SARAH PALIN CANNOT BE A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE 55% OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY IS LEANING TOWARDS EVILNESS OF THE LIBERALISM FAVORED BY THE WHAT CALLED THE ANTI-CHRIST. Only 45% or less of the American people have still faith and belief on the one true God, and these few Americans cam stand on their religious beliefs no matter what happened. These 45% voters will be the one to support Palin. How can Palin possibly wins this 2012 bid? Only God the almighty can change United States corrupt political system.

Raymond of FL 4:29PM March 24, 2009

Well, Well, Well, I can see that our tax and spend congress with Princess Pelosi at the helm is looking to make more tax revenue that they can spend. Here is a little clue princess, if you don't put stipulations on the money when you give it, it will be kind of hard on you to do it afterwards.

Furthermore, for all you lapdogs in congress, if you are ready to tax the AIG executives bonuses then you should be prepared to tax Franklin Raines and the 90 billion dollars that he made while running Fannie into the ground. I mean really if it's good for the goose it should be good for the gander.

In regards to the Governor from South Carolina, I would say that this is one smart cookie. I mean really, why shouldn't he pay off debt with the money. His state would be that much better off. Besides, you didn't put any stipulations on the money with AIG, why should you put any on the Governor of South Carolina? I guess this just more Obama hypocrisy in action.

Joseph Heun of NY 8:25PM March 17, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

Catholic Birth Control Fight About Healthcare, Not Just Religion

The framing of the issue of required contraceptive coverage in religious terms obscures the real question.

Rick Santorum's Sweep Means It’s Still Anybody’s Race

The GOP finds itself in the unusual position of not being sure who its nominee will eventually be.

advertisement