AIG Bonuses Make Obama, Geithner, and Blogosphere Angry, Plus Remembering Ron Silver

March 16, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Our daily look at stories and topics that are lighting up the Internets:

AIG: The A is for Angry

Everyone is unhappy with AIG today. Here's what happened: After receiving something like $150 billion from the U.S. government in bailout money, it turns out the insurance giant's financial products unit is getting $450 million in bonuses. From CNN: "Lawmakers have been pushing for AIG to release a list of its counterparties since last fall, arguing taxpayers have a right to know how federal aid is being used." The list of AIG recipients of bailout money is drawing as much outrage as the bonuses—look no further than this AP headline, or this reaction from President Obama, or almost any article on the subject, for example. The Treasury and AIG are justifying the bonuses by arguing the company was under contractual obligation and would have faced lawsuits had it not paid. Here's what bloggers were saying: our very own Robert Schlesinger thinks AIG needs a "come to Jesus" moment, while liberal Satyam Khanna writes that Democratic Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts might just give it one. The Washington Post's Bill Kristol thinks AIG's excuse is a crock of, well, a crock of excessive and possibly masochistic indulgence on the part of company executives. Think bloggers, politicians, farm animals (practically anything that breathes) are angry? Take a look at the interview Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke gave to 60 Minutes. Andrew Sullivan pulls this Bernanke line as the quote of the day: "I slammed the phone more than a few times on discussing AIG."

Liddy Vs. Geithner, et al.

Over the weekend, AIG CEO Edward Liddy sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner about the bonuses in which, as Josh Marshall explains, Liddy tells Geithner, "with great courtesy and heaviness of heart, to go screw himself." The letter is available here. Jessica Pressler points us to a "totally scary" website that's already formed listing the names of AIG executives. Josh Marshall, in another post on AIG, gets to the heart of the problem: "What we're trying to do is untangle a massive ball of twine these guys created. And as much as we might revile these characters we can't do without their help trying to get it unwound." This liberal blogger thinks the Obama administration's fight against the bonuses is useless in terms of tangible results, but indispensable politically. And Joe Gandelman posts a great roundup of his own on reactions to AIG, arguing that the scandal "could become catalyst for outrage against the bailouts, banks and perhaps even corporations in general."

Remembering Ron Silver

Much like the outrage directed at AIG, bloggers of all political stripes responded to news of actor and political activist Ron Silver's passing mournfully. "Ron Silver got me drunk when I was 12 years old," eulogizes actor Ben Stiller. "He treated us like people, even though we weren't yet." Liberal talking head Paul Begala writes: "With the passing of activist and actor Ron Silver, the intersection of art and politics has lost one of the truly good guys." And in one of those rare, beautiful moments, Michelle Malkin agrees with liberal bloggers: "Silver's rare, brave voice in the entertainment industry will be missed." Conservative Mark Steyn debates Silver's political orientation: "Ron Silver wasn't a 'conservative.' He was a liberal who couldn't see why that required giving a profoundly illiberal enemy carte blanche to kill you. There should have been a few more like that in the wake of 9/11."

...Meanwhile...

President Obama will appear on Jay Leno's Tonight Show this Thursday... Levi Johnston isn't ruling out the possibility of potentially marrying Bristol Palin... Russian President Vladimir Putin meets Ronald Reagan during his childhood (picture)... Dick Cheney "loves" Rush Limbaugh... And Meghan McCain tells Laura Ingraham to "kiss my fat ass!"

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

When you buy a house, part of the loans documents is a source and use of funds that details exactly how the money being lent is to be spent. When a real estate developer borrows money to build a skyscraper, the construction budget is part of the loan document, detailing line by line exactly how the money will be spent. When a company goes public, there is a "use of funds" document filed with the SEC detailing how the proceeds will be spent.

Our government gave AIG $171 billion WITHOUT specifying how any of the money would be used. Rightly or wrongly, there was NOTHING to prevent AIG executives from paying any or all of the $171 billion in bonuses. This is inexcusable. How can the government spend our money without putting the proper checks and balances in place? While it is understandable that Obama is angry at AIG, where is the anger at the Federal bureaucrats? Will there be hearings in front of Congress where government officials are called to testify WHY they gave away $171 billion with NO strings attached? And will questions be asked about what is being done so this doesn't repeat itself with the $817 billion in stimulus money or TALF?

Bill of NJ 10:06AM March 17, 2009

We're simply throwing good money after bad! President Obama should fire the whole lot of them... put them out on the street to compete with others for new jobs who are already out there through no fault of their own! So what if AIG or ML had contracts! Let those idiots sue if they've got the nerve!

George Hennessee of TX 9:22PM March 16, 2009

Why is congress not blocking bonuses if it were not for over 100 billion dollar in tax payers money the company would have went bankrupt there would have been no bonuses everything would have been liquidated and many of there leaders would have possibally been on trial like some of these past future giants so you are making these probally million aires even richer than they or ready or they or probally set for live for losing over 100 billion dollars how do you consider this legal this story will not die the democratic party will have to live with this come the next election congress is the law this is not there money why or they not doing anything broke companies in the past have been on trial for giving away money this company would be broke by 100 billion dollars or more if not for taxpayer money congress you here america hollowing do something if these or AIG best minds they need to be replaced

mike brown of IN 5:50PM March 16, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

advertisement