To a Bailout Economy: Defense Contractors Fight Budget Cuts With Jobs Promises

Defense contractors fight budget cuts with 'Now Hiring' signs, Stephen Glain writes

February 27, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Stephen Glain is a Washington-based columnist for the Abu Dhabi National. He is writing a book about the militarization of U.S. foreign policy.

Leave it to the merchants of war to mount a nimble rearguard action.

America's defense contractors, who never shied from exploiting the Iraq war for commercial gain, are now marketing themselves as a critical source of employment amid murmurs of the most significant cuts in defense spending in a generation. Production of components for missile defense systems sustains 1,936 jobs and generates $192 million annually for the economy of the state of Arizona, Boeing points out in a recent press release. The F-22 Raptor has created 44,000 jobs nationwide, says Lockheed Martin, the company that builds the state-of-the-art fighter jet. The U.S. auto industry may be on life support, but the Army's Future Combat Systems program is keeping 1,678 people employed, declares the U.S. Army.

Well—to borrow that underappreciated phrase from Marilyn Rice-Davies—they would, wouldn't they? The Pentagon, after all, is no more willing to see the dispatching of its budget ox than any other government agency. The Office of Management and Budget announced last week that the Obama administration is setting the Pentagon's 2010 budget at $524 billion, about $60 billion below its draft spending plan. Even Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has warned the Pentagon that its wish list for costly, high-tech weaponry may be pared back at a time when two simultaneous wars have depleted the military of more basic warfighting wares. 

Arms makers are not the only one who have cause for concern. In case you haven't noticed it, the War on Terror is over. Reporters in Washington have recently noted how President Barack Obama has all but jettisoned the term, which had no redeeming value except as a device to scare voters, cow lawmakers—and sustain a national security budget that made Washington the epicenter of Terror Inc.

Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Congress allocated billions of dollars for states to shore up their defenses against a future assault. (In a cautionary tale for those following the negotiations over Mr. Obama's economic stimulus plan, much of those funds ended up paying for pork-barrel projects that had nothing to do with national defense.) To ensure a larger slice of the counter-terrorism pie, governors hired armies of Washington lobbyists to plead their case to Congress. To win their share of related business, security companies hired consulting agencies to polish their bids and presentations. The consulting agencies, in turn, hired more staff and rented larger, more elegant office space. That increased the demand for office buildings, which created the need for builders, which meant more building tools and materials.

Within months, Terror Inc. had spawned the Terror Economy, a vortex of new weapons and warriors, Jersey barriers, commercial property agents, PowerPoint presenters, uniform designers, arms-show caterers, systems integrators, and software creators. Well before mid-2007, when America's bubble economy finally burst, Washington, D.C., had become a Jerusalem of terror where thousands of security specialists, contractors, consultants, and pundits would gather to peddle their orthodoxy and replenish their address books. Their mass exodus to Washington fueled a construction boom so extensive that entire city blocks were cordoned off for months. The economic output that was lost to traffic snarls and other burdens on the city's blighted infrastructure was more than compensated for by the demand for hotel conference rooms, embassy security, and duck tape.

Now that the War on Terror is over, what will sustain Washington as the New Acropolis? Why, the Bailout Economy, of course. Mr. Obama's massive stimulus package will make the states more dependent on Washington than ever. Conveniently, the people who will dominate the Bailout Economy are already in place. The same lobbyists who worked Congress for antiterrorist funding will cajole lawmakers for money for new roads and airports. The same companies that bagged the big deals of the Terror Economy—the highly diversified Lockheed Martins, Raytheons, and Boeings—will build the Bailout Economy's energy grids, rail links, and computer networks.

Tags:
recession,
Department of Defense,
economy,
defense spending,
foreign policy

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What kind of socialist are you, Mr. "W stimulated the economy"? That is exactly the same idiotic, Keynesian thinking that is responsible for the bailout bill. Oh yeah! I forgot! W passed the bailout bill in the first place! It's not Democrats or Republicans, but BIG GOVERNMENT that is the problem. That includes defense contractors, or perhaps you have forgotten President Eisenhower's prescient speech on the eve of leaving office?

If you want to spend MY money through the government, you are a socialist and "un-American," at least according the the Founding Fathers.

Of course we must have a competent military - how about doubling the pay of everyone in uniform? That would be a good place to start, instead of asking 19-year-olds to risk their lives for $19K a year. Of course it's stupid to spend tax money on mice and tattoo removal for gangsters! But it's just as stupid to spend a trillion dollars attacking a country that had no WMD and nothing to do with 9/11 - and don't give me those lame, internet-legend, Cheney excuses. Big government is big government, and it's all bad - get rid of it. That's the real American way. Anything else is for socialist, snail-eating pussies.

Xmeromota of AL 7:08PM July 08, 2009

If the Obama-banned "War on Terror" was such a flop, where are all the terrorists? And as soon as we back off fighting the "terrorists", where do you think they'll all show up?

I certainly don't agree with everything GWB did but he did this:

Responded to the attack on American soil,

Prevented a new attack AND

stimulated our economy after 911 with the military budget.

These were necessary things for OUR government to do.

The Obamacrats are spending on unnecessary things that we (as a Nation) cannot afford right now and discussing cutting back a huge JOB supplier to pay for Obama's

BRAVE NEW WORLD.

I really don't know who scares me more, Bin Laden or Obama?

Chris Petty of GA 4:26PM February 27, 2009

Big bad business exploiting the Iraq war? Best to remain silent and thought stupid rather than speak and remove all doubt.

William H. Miller of ME 3:46PM February 27, 2009

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

advertisement