Would Clinton Foundation Pose a Conflict of Interest for Secretary of State?

January 14, 2009 RSS Feed Print

During yesterday's confirmation hearing for Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton, Sen. Dick Lugar voiced concerns over foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation. "The core of [the] problem is that foreign governments and entities may perceive the Clinton Foundation as a means to gain favor with the secretary of state," said Lugar, an Indiana Republican. The "Clinton Foundation exists as a temptation for any foreign entity that, or government that, believes it could curry favor through a donation. It also sets up potential perception problems." With at least $46 million donated to Bill Clinton's foundation by foreign governments, could Hillary's appointment as secretary of state pose a conflict of interest? What should be done to ensure the integrity of her designated position? Post your thoughts.

Previously: Sen. Roland Burris, Huh?

Tags:
State Department,
Hillary Clinton,
Bill Clinton

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Plant Ground,service interest cause feel code vote expression of system mile total type country agreement offer form home today one may our unfortunately direct otherwise grey including atmosphere prefer need explanation list head law island mechanism statement judge attention enable solicitor start wall operate complex exercise fairly colleague refuse admit refuse close quality external faith interested earn guide consumer step climb study wall couple point street season turn panel deep store base watch favour journey lord extremely beneath future video manager hand show rich move frequently picture look trust right act original

Kingemployment of 11:06AM January 02, 2010

ANYONE WORKING IN THE US GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE ASSHAMED OF THEMSELVES FOR TAKING GIFTS AND MONEY FROM PEOPLE THAT WANT TO TEAR DOWN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.THE GOVERMENT IS SUPPOSE TO BE WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES,NOT GAINING FOR MONEY FOR THEMSELVES.GOD HELP US!!!!!

Leon Alford JR. of IN 8:03PM January 15, 2009

The source of funds is problematic, and I don't think that Mr. Clinton should be receiving large gifts from countries which promote terrorism (eg Saudi Arabia). As we know too well, the Clintons are only human. It's going to be hard for Hillary to negotiate with some rogue nation if at the same time Bill is getting funds for his trust from that nation (or its citizens). Mr Lugar is spot on in his criticism, and he's also right to suggest even tighter limits on contributors than the Clintons have currently agreed to.

SoCal Gal of CA 7:17PM January 14, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

What John Edwards Tells Us About the Legal Profession

The legal profession is experiencing a very serious breakdown of ethics.

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

Mitt Romney Should Put Up or Shut Up on Syria

The Republican candidate has proven he doesn't have the foreign policy credentials necessary to be president.

Mitt Romney's Colorado Disconnect

The presumptive GOP nominee seems unwilling or unable to talk about local issues in a swing state he desperately needs to win.

Donald Trump Makes Kim Kardashian Look Good

At least Kim Kardashian doesn't take herself seriously.

The Vietnam War Still Haunts Us

History rhymes once again, thanks so much.

'Transcripters' Make Birthers Look Smart

Now the fringe right wants the president's university grades to prove he wasn't a good student.

advertisement