8 Steps Barack Obama Can Take for a More Effective Government

November 28, 2008 RSS Feed Print

President-elect Barack Obama has made a number of pledges regarding making government more effective.

He promised to designate a Chief Performance Officer, who would report to the president and, along with a SWAT team of highly trained government professionals, would lead a line-by-line review of the budget, lead governmentwide and agency-by-agency performance target setting and tracking, and conduct turnarounds of failing programs.

Obama also made a raft of other promises relating to improving government effectiveness: cutting wasteful spending, fixing government contracting, implementing consequences for success and failure, moving workers from bloated bureaucracies to the front lines, eliminating wasteful redundancy, streamlining government procurement, protecting whistle-blowers, increasing the use of technology, and slashing earmarks. And he said he will use technology and lessons from the private sector to improve efficiency across every level of government—because we cannot meet 21st-century challenges with a 20th-century bureaucracy.

Here are eight steps Obama should take to drive higher performance within the government.

1. Start early. The right time to devise and implement a president's responses to government management and performance challenges is at the start of the administration, at the same time he is defining his legislative, budget, and policy strategies. While many of the president's appointees will not yet be confirmed, management and performance cannot wait. How soon the administration begins its management initiatives will likely determine how successful the initiatives will be. President Clinton announced the formation of the National Performance Review in March 1993 and released its report in September 1993; work began on President Bush's agenda in March 2001 and the president released his President's Management Agenda in August 2001.

2. Establish an overarching set of principles and values. A clear agenda is needed to build and sustain the support needed to further a president's program and agenda. It is incumbent on a president and his immediate White House team to articulate the direction they want to take. Presidents Clinton and Bush each articulated a brief set of principles and effectively communicated them to both political and career employees throughout government.

3. Secure and maintain top-level support throughout the White House and within the Office of Management and Budget. Without such strong leadership at the highest levels, management agendas will have limited impact. Indeed, a management initiative may well be counterproductive in the absence of support and unequivocal commitment at the level of senior White House officials and cabinet officers. President Clinton asked Vice President Al Gore to lead his effort. He maintained "hands-on" involvement throughout the administration. President Bush, the first "M.B.A. president," took an active role in pushing his management agenda and is reported to have discussed department and agency scorecards with cabinet members.

4. Appoint leaders who "get it." No attempt to achieve change and improve results will succeed without leaders at the top who are personally committed to change and who understand what is required in order to improve operating performance. That means picking people who care and know how to undertake change in a disciplined, systematic, and sustained way. They should have previous, successful experience leading, or helping lead, a change effort in a large public or private organization. The Bush administration was particularly noted for its CEO style of management with clear lines of responsibility and accountability assigned for particular tasks.

5. Link actions to improvements in mission and operating performance. Leaders must understand the need and importance of using the president's management reform agenda to improve the operating performance of their department or agency against its mission. Management is a tool to make organizations capable of producing results. Change and innovation will be needed to create a different government capable of producing even greater results, indeed, quantum increases that the public will notice. In some cases, this will entail radically rethinking operations and striving for step-by-step changes in performance.

Tags:
Obama administration,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

is it just me... or is there a lot of unsolicited Obama Advice floating around out there inthe media?...it seems everyone and their mother has 2 pennies of "wisdom" on what he SHOULD do.....I find it interesting. And they speak so authoritatively as if they are telling HIM how to do his job!

I don't recall in recent political history so much unsolicited advice for an incoming president. I would love to know what it is attributed to?...it's almost as if they feel he's not intelligent or savvy enough (ha!) to already know what he's doing and meditatively consult with his top notch cabinet on what he want's to do and how to do it......

I wonder if this is the same phenomenon that many minorities and some women in high positions in the corporate world claim they face from time to time as well....constant second-guessing, unsolicited advice based on an an assumption of incompetence/ignorance.......heck...or maybe it's due to the fact that people feel this pres and his administration may be a little more open to suggestions and advice than the previous one......all in all, I still find it very curious.....

And this from the press that failed to do it's job during the ramp-up to a war based on faulty evidence and hidden agendas.

Jonny Mac of CA 4:42PM January 03, 2009

My comments are in relation to number 7 of the eight suggested steps "collaboration". In some locations the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Mangement through a consistent and persitient general need have taken on a successful collaborative process with the owners of the National Forests and Public Lands (the Citizens of the United States). This collaboration, assisted and moved forward by the reinvention of government, revolves around attempting to make sense of the desires of the land's "owners" who are decidedly not of one mind about any matter. I feel this model that exists in the field could be emulated and adapted to the need for new executive branch leadership for quick and effective trasition.

From experience I firmly believe if a representative sampling of formal and informal leaders of an agency were given a space and questions to ponder and answer together, answers would emerge that would yeild a smoother and more effective and efficient transition than previous ones. I support the authors suggestion for the innovative use of this valuable tool for leadership.

MJ of AZ of AZ 6:10PM December 03, 2008

A while back, when the Homeland Security Bill was being thrashed out, President Bush wanted authority to move people in civil service in response to threats. I haven't looked up the specifics, but I do remember the Democrats raising up in anger because this meant abolishing many of the protections that unionized civil service members had. In effect, President Bush was told that if he needed people in other areas, hire same, but don't you dare try to draw down anywhere, because those same unionized civil servants were a Democratic power base. In similiar light with the current Big Three auto companies and the UAW, Obama is going to have some fun choices if he really means what he says. Because any move to improve or streamline government means telling some unionized civil servants, "You are fired!" I can see that selling well to his party. Just like with the Big Three when the UAW is told that they will have to really trim body count or benefits for any bailout. For a president who as much as stated that he would support unions, Obama will redefine the term "tough love". Can't wait to see the reaction from Pelosi and Reid when the details start coming out. Which is why I agree with many of the commenters above. This is all smoke/mirrors.

Tom V. of VA 8:57AM December 03, 2008

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

advertisement