Is Negative Campaigning Good for America?

Reader Comments

Back to article

If the political view point scale were a 1-10, with conservatives at one end and liberals at the other, most Americans would rate themselves somewhere in the middle. In our current national political situation you are forced to pick from either end of the scale. Negative ads are there to push us to either end of the scale. Because of this kind of advertising, we then make our choices based on what we don't like, instead of what we do.

Robert Sanders of TX 8:37AM July 06, 2010

Negative ads make the candidate seem petty and meanspirited, which are not traits that I want in a leader. To disagree with your opponant's positions can be accomplished by a well reasoned dialogue justifying your position versus his/her's. All too often the "facts" in negative ads are out and out lies or serious distortions of the truth, and people viewing these ads know that. We, the voting public, aren't stupid... please.

Jennie, California July 5

Jennie Smith of CA 12:10AM July 06, 2010

By the way, I have been in professional sales for 24 years. The kind of sales in which the sales cycle is long, 2 years or so, and you must count on repeat business with the same customer base. I have never figured out how to convince my clients to buy from me by denigrating my competition. I have always thought that my clients were too intelligent to be tricked into making a decision in my favor. I have always thought that I must show the value of my product or service in order for them to decide in my favor.

Apparently, that does not seem to be the case in our current political environment.

William Matthew Pizzolato of CA 6:54PM July 05, 2010

"We" say we don't want them, but apparently enough of "us" respond to them in a predictable way, so you'll continue to see politicians use them.

Will of CA 6:49PM July 05, 2010

I agree with Elizabeth of Texas. I want an Honest report from the canidate of where they stand on important issues and how they plan to lead this country in a positive way.

Larry of TX 5:25PM July 05, 2010

I hate negative ads. I won't watch TV stations that run them or listen to radio stations that play them. I prefer to read in-depth reports of candidates positions and history, and watch debates.

Elizabeth of TX 5:12PM July 05, 2010

I won't vote for the clown that does not provide a positive base for his campaign and I tell many people my opinion which sometimes affects theirs. Politicans should straighten up their act and actually plan to hold the honor of the office they have been elected to do and do their job.

Pat Hall of VA 4:53PM July 05, 2010

Negative campaigning is bad

bob of KY 10:50AM March 19, 2010

As an effort to intimidate an opponent, there is nothing like a good scandal, or negative campaign ad to deter endorsement; it even works for remote endorsement.

But for the nation, who wants to invest in a nation that is so foolishly inept as to allow itself to be swayed by every scandal, every negative attack, etc. If reputations are important, and they most surely are in politics, reputations built upon fear, scandal, intimidation, and coercion are among the worst that America distributes globally.

For those who follow America, or model themselves after it, are we not our own worst enemy, by sewing what we then reap from other nations?

Shooting oneself in the foot isn't common sense; in fact, it is anything but common sense that focuses upon the relationship between cause and result.

Ignoring our own flaws, or disguising them as advantages, or benefits, doesn't work either because the method lacks credibility, and hence, the candidate using them lacks credibility, however popular he, or she, may be.

Elections may never be totally honest in that they are always manipulated events by a plethora of campaign managers some of whom are, at least, civic minded, rather than self-aggrandizing. Those that are tend to be "outed" rather quickly by the openness with which Americans conduct their campaigns. That is not to say that Americans can go overboard in their zeal and become far too zealous in their attempt to discredit a candidate. The balance between free speech and malignment is sometimes very narrow, and most of it is pure judgment and opinion. How much is fact never seems to make the airwaves since, in many cases, accusations are enough to destroy political careers.

Yellow journalism, war mongering, and such have a long history in American independence as far back as Alexander Hamilton and the history of dueling; who knows what existed before that time, even in our European heritage nations from whence we all came? Chances are it did not arrive on American soil spontaneously. It may well have had an even longer history in those nations from whence we all came.

When Americans make value judgments upon the limits of negative campaigns that they be truthful and honest, however devastating it may be to a candidate, they are making a value judgment, and providing a healing process to nations of other lands who may also suffer under the weight of such damaging frivolity, and self-serving political destruction.

If America is to be a model, she must be a model with a measure of well considered self discipline rather than falling victim to market typhology that ruins lives, or she will have earned her reputation as leaderless, and valueless in a system of freedom that permits predatory capitalism and an anything goes philosophy, as long as it produces money and profits.

The world would be free, and indeed, encouraged to view America as insignificant ruffians hell bent on personal if not national destruction.

Pat Ross of MA 11:50AM July 14, 2009

In every presidential campaign since t.v was invented had negative campaigning. Negative campaigning is just a tactic used by presidential candidates both democratic and republican.

I think it is alright to do if you are running for president. They go into each others backgrounds and find out whatever they can and then make an add about it. To try to down the opponent.

Marcus Lancaster of ME 1:48PM October 28, 2008

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

What John Edwards Tells Us About the Legal Profession

The legal profession is experiencing a very serious breakdown of ethics.

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

Mitt Romney Should Put Up or Shut Up on Syria

The Republican candidate has proven he doesn't have the foreign policy credentials necessary to be president.

Mitt Romney's Colorado Disconnect

The presumptive GOP nominee seems unwilling or unable to talk about local issues in a swing state he desperately needs to win.

Donald Trump Makes Kim Kardashian Look Good

At least Kim Kardashian doesn't take herself seriously.

The Vietnam War Still Haunts Us

History rhymes once again, thanks so much.

'Transcripters' Make Birthers Look Smart

Now the fringe right wants the president's university grades to prove he wasn't a good student.

advertisement