The Financial Crisis—How'd We Get Here, and What's Next?

The resolution of the banking crisis could be back to the future, Vernon Hill writes.

October 1, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Without a doubt, America is experiencing the most severe financial crisis since World War II. Institutions are failing, iconic brands are disappearing, and Americans are wondering what is next.

How did we get here? Who is at fault? Where are we going? What will the new American financial landscape look like?

During the Depression, the U.S. financial structure was radically reshaped. Investment banks were separated from deposit-taking commercial banks, with risk and innovation removed from the insured deposit banking system. A bargain was struck: Commercial banks would receive FDIC insurance, serve their communities with credit and banking services, and avoid high-risk, high-profit investment banking. Investment banks would be free to pursue underwriting, principal investment, and investment activities at their own risk but free of meaningful regulation and government support.

And so it was for 30 years.

Then, beginning in the 1970s, the pact was broken, and the "shadow banking system" began. Money market funds, commercial paper, hedge funds, securitization, CDOs, and SIVs were all created by the clever investment bankers anxious to steal the cream from the commercial banking system. Money market funds provided higher rates without the safeguards and burdens of insured bank deposits. Commercial paper provided lower rates with the false illusion of stable funding. Securitization completely separated the lenders from the borrowers.

While America's banks were burdened by stifling regulation, inept supervision, and social burdens (such as the Community Reinvestment Act, which mandated loans to credit-unworthy borrowers), the investment banks were free to invest, invest, and exploit. But the assumption was that the risk was theirs—not the American taxpayer's.

Now the "shadow banking system" has collapsed. Massive borrowing, backed with unstable funding, and overinvestment in assets of questionable value has led to the Wall Street panic. And where do the uninsured, unregulated "shadow banks" go for rescue? Not to their shareholders, not to the market, but to the federal government.

In one day, with none of the usual supervision or regulatory review, congressional oversight, or information, two of the largest players—Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley—get instant commercial bank charters and are now bailed out by the federal government. Treasury Secretary Paulson—until recently chairman of Goldman Sachs—bails out Goldman Sachs.

And now the "shadow banking system," in the name of Mom and Pop, cries for a massive taxpayer bailout. But America rebels: Why should the taxpayers bail out Wall Street? Why is this only a crisis when Wall Street is in trouble?

It is not the American banking system that is broken, but the Wall Street "masters of the universe" and, of course, such fatally flawed S&L models as Washington Mutual. Where are we going? Back to the future?

Here's what we can expect:

  • Investment banks as independent companies will cease to exist.
  • Commercial banks with stable deposit funding will prosper.
  • Credit will continue to grow.
  • Innovation will suffer, but risk will be reduced.
  • The federal government will intrude even more on our freedoms with more regulation, ridiculous legislation, and invasion of our privacy.

Yet despite this massive failure of not only Wall Street but also the federal government and a few bank outliers, America will solve the problem and continue to prosper. American ingenuity has always overcome government idiocy and in this case Wall Street excesses, and it will again.

Vernon Hill is the founder and former CEO of Commerce Bancorp. He writes at BankStocks.com.

Tags:
banking,
FDIC,
Wall Street

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I am not sure why Mr Hill wrote this article. It lacks any information at all. It is a poorly worded summary of what we already know. I see interesting thoughts or ideas. it appears to be a overly simplified summary of events to date that could be written by a High School student. Please don't insult my intelligence I expect more information such as to define what is meant by a "shadow banking system." Who are the "Wall Street Masters of the Universe?" What company do they work for? What led them to think that these mortgage backed securities would be a endless stream of wealth? Was it an honost mistake or downright corruption?

I expect more out of a CEO from Bankcorp. Or am I to beleive that when it comes down to it, everyone in finance is clueless?

Ed

Edward Wagner of CA 1:54AM October 02, 2008

Credit is flowing steady from what I'm seeing, as long as people don't have bad credit they shouldn't be having any problem. Is this bailout so bad credit risks can get credit???

Ray Fisher of NM 9:13PM October 01, 2008

I fail to see how a communist idea (US Federal Government ownership of personal property disguished as buying up the "bad debt") is a good idea to cover up the failed socialist experimentation of the Community Reinvestment Act. As usual, things break faster, harder, and more deeply with Federal assistance -- especially when normative economics enters the rationale such as with the CRA. How about we release the pressure on the credit system with massive reduction of government expenditures instead of taxing me twice as is the case now. Once because of the reduction of my home value and the second time when I have to pay more taxes to fund the "bailout" which is yet another wealth transfer. Transfering wealth from those who can manage their finances to those who cannot -- or maybe were never expected to do so.

David Jackson of OH 3:52PM October 01, 2008

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

Catholic Birth Control Fight About Healthcare, Not Just Religion

The framing of the issue of required contraceptive coverage in religious terms obscures the real question.

Rick Santorum's Sweep Means It’s Still Anybody’s Race

The GOP finds itself in the unusual position of not being sure who its nominee will eventually be.

advertisement