On Cuba, Obama and Castro Trade Signals About Talks

April 17, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

In a surprising and quick response to President Obama's policy moves, Cuban President Raúl Castro is offering to talk directly with the U.S. government about an array of sensitive subjects, including human rights, freedom of the press, and political prisoners.

Castro responded just hours after Obama, on a visit to Mexico City, said that it was up to Havana to take the next step after Washington's move to end restrictions on Cuban-Americans traveling to and sending money to relatives on the island. The Cuban leader, professing an open mind on talks as long as Cuba is treated as an equal with the right to self determination, said that "we have sent word to the U.S. government, in private and in public, that we are willing to discuss everything."

Raúl Castro, the brother of ailing former President Fidel Castro, has said in the past that he would be willing to meet with Obama for talks in a neutral place and would respond to U.S. actions to improve relations "gesture for gesture."

His rapid response to Obama, coming just before the start of a 34-nation Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago, may be aimed at keeping up the pressure from other Latin American nations on Washington to ease its hard-line Cuban policy, which still includes an economic embargo and a ban on general travel.

Castro's move likely also reflects his smooth assumption of power, which was formalized in February 2008. He has been putting his own stamp on the Cuban power structure, including firing prominent cabinet members and ordering modest economic reforms.

Obama is personally popular with Cubans, who have high hopes that some improvement can be made in a tense, Cold War-style relationship that has endured for a half a century. Castro, who has seemed more attentive to popular sentiments and discontents than was his brother, may feel an incentive to show that he is willing to be responsive to Obama, at least in principle.

Obama this week called on Cuba to respond with steps "grounded in respect for human rights," a reference to Havana's jailing of political prisoners and lack of political freedoms. But U.S. officials have also said that a broader policy review on Cuba continues, opening the possibility of further steps to generate direct talks with the Communist government.

Tags:
Cuba,
Obama administration,
foreign policy,
Fidel Castro

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If you really want to know the REAL Story in Cuba go visit therealcuba.com you can see why we should do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO SUPPORT THE REGIME THERE. The Castro Brothers have dessimated the people of Cuba far worse than the Mafia. People in Cuba go to jail for wearing the wrong clothes, neighbors turn in neighbors in order to get Refrigerators and Apartments, Artists are persecuted BY THE STATE, the hospitals for the people of CUBA are infested with vermin and disease and we continue to allow this to take place less than 100 Miles from our shores.

S Sears of GA 1:49PM May 19, 2010

Since the US embargo started, Cuba has had commercial ties and lines of credit with some countries in Europe, Canada, Spain, Mexico, and even China.

In spite of these, the economic framework is a complete and dismal failure because it is centralized and it ignores the most basic of human needs, which is self realization without encroachment from the state.

Countries such as Spain, Mexico and Canada have made substantial investments in the island to promote tourism through the construction and management of tourist complexes such as those in cayo Coco, which look no different than those in Cozumel and Acapulco.

The only winners have been the investors and the cuban government, which take in a large percentage of the profits. These places do not allow the general population in and working there is restricted.

The point I am trying to make is that the cuban people will not benefit from large scale investments from abroad. Change will come only when the government realizes it has to change the political system.

Eduardo L of FL 1:25PM January 05, 2010

As we all know, there are "conspiracy theories" about who killed JFK. How could such a thing happen? It turned out the secret service didn't perform as usual. The top was left down on the car even after ads were in Dallas papers, almost death threats. I make this comment to see if someone, unknowingly, might have a photo of "a man on or near the curb to the right and ahead of JFK, with "a gun built into his hand." A man told me that when I manned a Democrat registration booth. He said the man's sleeve could hide the gun. If he pointed his hand, as if waving, he could fire the gun & not be discovered. The fatal shot hit the right side of his head near the front.. If anyone can add to my comment, I'll be watching. That "man with the gun" would probably be dead now, so it's really an academic question. Oswald was killed so fast after JFK died, he had no chance to tell what he knew. A coup happened, and LBJ was fooled by faked cables to start the Nam War. It made us support corrupt Catholic Pres. Diem, protege of Cardinal Spellman. Diem profited from heroin. See "The Politics of Heroin in SE Asia," McCoy, and The Pentagon Papers.

auradawn veirs of CA 2:55AM October 14, 2009

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos