Israel’s Likud Party Turns Ultra-Hawkish

Right-wing party leader Netanyahu finds himself outflanked by hardliners

December 10, 2008 RSS Feed Print

By Mark Lavie
Associated Press Writer

JERUSALEM (AP) — Benjamin Netanyahu suffered a setback Tuesday in his quest to reclaim the prime minister's office in Israel when his front-running Likud Party chose a slate of candidates even more hawkish than him.

The outcome could weaken his party's popularity, and even if Netanyahu wins a Feb. 10 election, it could limit his ability to negotiate peace with Israel's Arab neighbors.

The big winner in results announced early Tuesday was Netanyahu's nemesis, Moshe Feiglin. While Netanyahu opposes the current peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians and hopes to limit contacts to economic cooperation, Feiglin goes much further. His theocratic platform calls for banning minority Arab citizens from the parliament, encouraging non-Jews to leave the country and pulling Israel out of the United Nations.

Netanyahu, who resisted peace efforts when he was prime minister from 1996-1999, hoped to present a more mainstream list of candidates to bolster support for his party, backing popular ex-generals, politicians and others for the list.

But party members instead chose candidates with uncompromising views, led by Feiglin, who founded a movement that blocked highway intersections around the country in 1995 to protest partial peace accords between Israel and the Palestinians.

Others included the son of former Likud Prime Minister Menachem Begin, Benny Begin. He told Army Radio "there will be no (peace) agreement in the near future" because of Arab rejection of Israel.

Rivals did not hide their glee at the blow to Netanyahu's prestige. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Kadima, who is not seeking re-election, said the primary showed the Likud "has become an extreme right-wing party that would lead the state of Israel to a corner of isolation."

The election is set for three weeks after Barack Obama—who has pledged to work for a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians—takes office as U.S. president.

Even if Netanyahu intended to press for concessions to the Palestinians for peace—and many doubt he would—pressure from within his own party could stop him.

Recent polls have shown Netanyahu's Likud with a 10-seat lead over Kadima, headed by Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni. But they have also shown that the presence of Feiglin on the Likud list could scare away a significant number of potential voters. A Likud insider estimated a loss of three or four seats, while some analysts predicted even more erosion.

Livni reveled in Netanyahu's predicament. "The Likud list is not my problem. It's Bibi's problem," she said, using Netanyahu's nickname. "It's a weight around his neck, not mine."

Even the most optimistic polls had Likud winning about 35 seats in the 120-seat parliament, forcing Netanyahu to patch together a coalition with powerful partners from the ultra-Orthodox and ultra-hawkish sectors.

Losing even a handful of those 35 because of the Feiglin effect could drop Likud into a tie with Kadima, a centrist movement started by then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who broke away from Likud because of its opposition to his unilateral withdrawal from Gaza in 2005. That would make coalition-building more difficult and long-term stability doubtful.

Israel's electoral system, based on voting for parties instead of individual candidates, lends itself to multi-party results and a fractured parliament.

Over the past decade, traditional parties have been losing strength and sectorial parties have been gaining. After the last election, less than three years ago, Kadima formed a government after winning just 29 seats, holding less than a majority in its own government, a first in Israel.

When Olmert resigned in September because of corruption charges, Livni was chosen to replace him but was unable to form her own government—another first. The resulting national election will be Israel's fifth in less than seven years.

Tags:
Binyamin Netanyahu,
Likud Party,
Mideast peace,
Israel,
Middle East

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Being an American, I do believe that citizens of all nations should receive the full rights as humans and as citizens from their respected government no matter their race and or religion. But let us put down some ground work to think about. Okay Sam of NJ?

First, the Jews have been oppressed for most of their existence as a people. Their bondage in Egypt is recorded in Exodus and has been confirmed by archaeology in digs that show a older design for Egyptian houses that bear a high resemblance to houses seen Canaan when Israel was occupying the territory. The Assyrians, the masters of war, all but overthrew the Jewsish kingdom at the time and Hamaan asked for a genocide for the Jews in Babylon. The Greek rulers desecrated their holy place and the Romans destroyed their one and only temple. From then on, the Jews continued to be outcasts and second class citizens in whatever country they lived in at the time. Most recently, Hitler decided to put his devilish mind to use by beginning the Holocaust. But now, in the 20th and 21st centuries, the Jews have regained their ancient homeland and are being attacked by their neighbors because of it. The Palestinis and their allies attacked the Zionists before a Palestine state could be built.

Second,taking this evidence into consideration, Israel has every right to be hostile towards people who have shown a mutual feeling towards her. As for Israeli officials being cruel to their Palestini neighbors, think about how Muslims feel about everyone else (Genesis 16:12). The radicals that attack Israel would prefer to kill a Jew (no matter his/her citizenship), next a Westerner (preferably American), anyone who lives in the world who is not a Muslim comes after that, those who are not of the same sect follows, and last people that will kill is anyone outside their family/tribe. And you dare to judge Israel's actions?

Third, being a sovereign state, Israel does not have to be part of the UN and therefore does not have to obey their rules, espicially when the UN's forces are really American troops. And I seriously doubt that the US will turn against Israel (God help us if we do). Should Israel leave the UN, no nation on earth will destroy Israel (Ezekiel 38-9) and I believe Israel can carry on without the UN or the US. They gained their right to independence and freedom in 1948 during the Arab-Israeli conflict (giving it the right to exist as a separate country), held their own during the Suez Crisis, gained mastery of the skies in the Six Day War, and withstood a surprise attack in the Yom Kippur War.

So then, Sam of NJ, do you really think Israel cares about being discriminatory or that it is violating UN regulations? I don't think so.

Dr. Shade of NC 1:59PM December 27, 2008

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video