• Comment (6)

Pew: Public Perception of Media Bias Hits Historic High

Public believes CNN and Fox News are among the least trustworthy.

September 22, 2011 RSS Feed Print

In a new study that calls into question the credibility of the news business, public belief that the media is inaccurate, biased, and influenced by powerful people has reached historic highs, according to the Pew Research Center.

In Pew's biennial news survey, out today, the public revealed an alarming opinion that the media just can't be trusted to tell a story straight.

Said Pew, "The overall ratings for the performance of the news media are quite negative: Fully 66% say news stories often are inaccurate, 77 % think that news organizations tend to favor one side, and 80% say news organizations are often influenced by powerful people and organizations. The percentage saying that news stories are often inaccurate has risen 13 points since 2007, with much of the increase coming among Democrats and independents."

[Study: TV Morning News 'Dissing' GOP Candidates]

The public has also changed its view of the media, with cable TV taking the top slot over network TV and print. "When asked what first comes to mind when they think of 'news organizations,' 63% volunteer the name of a cable news outlet, with CNN and Fox News by far the most prevalent in people's minds. Only about a third (36%) name one of the broadcast networks. Fewer mention local news outlets or a national newspaper."

At the top of the TV heap, said Pew, is Fox and CNN. "The top sources of TV news are the Fox News Channel, cited by 19% of the public, CNN (15%), and local news programming (16%)," said Pew.

[Check out a slide show of the 10 media commentators the left and right hate the most.]

Also, while many get their news from the Internet, the study won't buoy big name news websites. "Just 3 percent name a website—either web-only or linked to a traditional news organization—when asked what comes to mind when they think of news organizations," said Pew.

The good news? At least the media is more believable than politicians, even the president. "Nearly seven-in-ten (69%) say they have a lot or some trust in information they get from local news organizations, while 59% say they trust information from national news organizations," said Pew. By comparison, "about half say they have a lot or some trust in information provided by their state government (51%) and the Obama administration (50%). Smaller percentages trust information from federal agencies (44%), business corporations (41%), Congress (37%) or candidates running for office (29%)."

Tags:
CNN,
Fox News,
media

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The most important aspect of getting the most from our news agencies is when it comes down to something as serious as a presidential election. However, bias can never be totally eliminated from the mix. Even minute gestures can have a devastating effect, but this is all we have when we are seriously working to learn what is truth, what is false, what is complete or what is incomplete. We are often left either convinced wrongly or left flailing for answers.

Our greatest democracy, like all democracies, depends upon that one right that dictatorships do not allow, which is the right of freedom of speech--of a free press that cannot be snuffed by government agencies--so our constant vigil must be to protect that and the rest of the rights our forefathers had established for us so long ago. We all know the weakness of an uninformed people, so we should be shocked at any who fail to seek out the truth and the total news of the day. Exercising our rights can be the only way we can maintain those rights, to be aware of any infringements, and to support any and all who will stand up for them whether that be in Washington or on a remote battlefield someplace far from home.

Because we absolutely depend upon our right to receive information, especially if it regards our politicians and the operations of government, whether these operations are successes or failures, we must insist that what we hear is the truth, or the complete news, rather than anything designed to support a side when it tends to deliberately guide us one way rather than allow us to make our own decisions based upon correct information containing all there is to know.

The right of free speech is a blessing most necessary for maintaining a free nation of people whose leaders are elected into servitude rather than of a people tricked by clever manipulations of information, who can easily be fooled by words of support for the little guy at the expense of the others. Only clear and concise news, bound to be complete and truthful, can keep us alert and in tune with our freedoms, and can keep our leaders where they are supposed to be. Once we know all the facts from a free and unbiased press, our leaders will always be kept as servants to the people rather than the other way around. Truth in reporting, it must be said, is the only way our most important right can have any real meaning at all. In fact, the entirety of our rights may depend upon this, which is because our own ignorance can create an unlocked door to our most sacred seats in our most hallowed halls, eventually allowing an encroachment of those whose designs are less than supportive of the American way.

Walt Bagley of NC 8:00PM November 04, 2012

The bulk of the media tends to swing far more to the left than the right, but that isn't the worst problem we face when we consider that too many Americans get most of their news and information, especially regarding the candidtates, from watching the more entertaining shows that bring pundits to the fore, most of whom seem to support the general side of the network heads. The only network that seems to bring articulate and successfully argumentative members of the other party into the conversation is Fox, the only network that seems unafraid of confronting anyone on the other side no matter how well-versed they happen to be.

One set of networks obviously leaves out a lot of important news, or breezes by anything that might look bad for Obama as though it has little or no meaning at all. You hear very little about the investigations now occurring regarding the attacks in Libya, where four Americans were murdered by well-armed affiliates of Al Qaeda, when our president and his entire administration has been found to have lied to our people...blatantly and deliberately, obviously covering for what really lies beneath the fluff and cotton candy words of support for our military and other Americans placed in harm's way. There are so many other lies, mostly about Romney, that have been told, but this other entire part of what should be current news has been smoothed over by those liberal pundits, the hosts and no doubt the heads of those extremely liberal shows where too many people get their information.

This is dangerous, at least to my way of thinking, in that our entire country depends upon the support of the people who will place candidates in office. If they are uninformed and easily led by clever tactics, what will happen to the greatest nation on the planet? If the bulk of our media works for one side to the degree that we now see, how can we ever trust what we hear? How can those of us who know what is really going on convince our countrymen to turn to more balanced reporting, when the sheer act of revealing the lies of the other side might, to them, appear as though both sides are doing it to the same degree? There is only one truth on various issues, so those who say something else must be involved in some form of prevarication. Who do you believe when you are unable to know the truth? Do you believe Chris Matthews and his pundits....or would you rather believe those our nation has placed in harm's way? You have to have some foundation based in truth in order to know who is lying, and because I pay very close attention when I can, I will always suggest the Fox Network for those who've been tricked by the left for far too long, but who actually do want to know what is really going on. Once they look around, most should agree that hearing all of the news, not part of it, is best because networks doing the eliminating of crucial events must have a more diabolical reason for doing so.

Walt Bagley of NC 7:15PM November 04, 2012

Do Republicans own your NEWS service? Even Terrorist Groups think FOX NEWS is a joke... Follow the money and policies.

LeeG of NY 6:08AM May 08, 2012

Subscribe Today

Want Your Whispers First?

Get the original Washington Whispers in an all new digital form. Check out U.S. News Weekly today.

advertisement

Washington Whispers

Has Dodd-Frank Really Hurt the Congo?

Groups say lawmakers are using conflict minerals as an excuse to weaken the financial reform bill.

Twitter and Facebook

Whispers on the Web

Friend Paul on Facebook.

Follow Paul on Twitter.

Latest Videos

Bobbles Poll

Bobbles Poll: Who's Fault For Congressional Gridlock?

House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have been fighting for a year on virtually every big congressional initiative and 2012 should be a repeat. Which leader is to blame for the gridlock in Washington?

View Results