Democrats Use GOP to Build Case for Reconciliation

March 1, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Forget all that talk last week that President Obama and the Democrats had no plans to use the legislative tactic of "reconciliation" to force through healthcare reform with a simple one-vote majority in the Senate. Not only do the Democrats plan to use it, but the party is swiftly trying to educate the public on why it's not such a rare procedure.

In an interesting online bid, the Democratic National Committee has spliced together quotes from Republicans and sympathetic pundits who admit that the GOP has been a big fan of the tactic when it has helped the party. Said the DNC today: "As they desperately scramble to paint passing legislation with a simple majority as radical, Republicans want you to forget that they have used reconciliation to pass major pieces of legislation, including the $1.8 trillion Bush tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, with a simple majority in the past and more often than Democrats. And you don't need to take our word for it."

For proof, the DNC released a Web ad called "A Couple of Points on Reconciliation." Here is a link and the transcript they sent Whispers:

DNC VIDEO: "A COUPLE POINTS ON RECONCILIATION"

PUBLIC YOUTUBE LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKgON_kSgGw

MEDIA-ONLY DOWNLOAD LINK: http://my.democrats.org/page/-/video/DNCWebVideo_20100301_A_Couple_Points_On_Reconciliation.mov

SCRIPT:

SEN. TOM COBURN: "I'd make a couple of points on reconciliation." [Face The Nation, 2/28/2010]

CNN: "It's been used 22 times, often on non budget issues by every President since Jimmy Carter." [2/28/2010]

DANA MILIBANK: "Well I think it's been pointed out repeatedly that it's not any particularly radical step." [Reliable Sources, 2/28/2010]

JIM ACOSTA, CNN: "Republicans have used it more when they've been in the majority—16 times. Compare that to the number of times used under Democratic majority, just six times." [3/1/2010]

CHRIS WALLACE: "So the argument 'well, it should be used for, you know, small budgetary matters ...' The fact is it's been used 22 times and two-thirds of the time, by Republicans not Democrats." [Fox News Sunday, 2/28/2010]

CNN: "Recent examples include Medicare overhaul for physician payments, back in 1989." [2/28/2010]

COBURN: "Welfare reform happened with reconciliation." [Face The Nation, 2/28/2010]

ACOSTA: "Reconciliation has been used for the children's health initiative, the CHIP program and COBRA, that's that program that allows you to take your health insurance with you if you lose your job." [3/1/2010]

COBURN: "The Bush tax cuts happened with reconciliation." [Face The Nation, 2/28/2010]

GORDON PETERSON: "You can't get 60 votes because the party on the other side of the aisle refuses to do anything constructive in this area. Is that Democrat Harry Reid in 2010? No, that's Judd Gregg in twenty—2005." [Inside Washington, 2/28/2010]

DAVID GREGORY: "You have voted for bills through reconciliation nine times since 1989." [Meet the Press, 2/28/2010]

SEN. JOHN MCCAIN: "Yes, I have voted for them." [Meet the Press, 2/28/2010]

MSNBC: "Reconciliation, that simple majority." [MSNBC, 3/1/2010]

FOX AND FRIENDS: "Now reconciliation is changing to simple majority, doesn't that sound much easier to swallow?" [Fox and Friends, 3/1/2010]

CHYRON: Rec-on-cil-i-a-tion a majority vote

[DNC Disclaimer]

Tags:
Tom Coburn

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

A majority of Americans - a large majority in fact - voted for a man who said he'd champion heathcare reform. And a majority of elected representatives support this reform as well. Why would that count less than polls, especially when poll results are largely affected by how the questions are formulated?

None of us like when "the other side" gets their legislation passed, but that's the American system. Suggesting we "throw them all out" is naive and simplistic. . .and there is no indication things would be any different with a complete change in the makeup of Congress, if that were even possible.

Something has to be done about the cost and availability of health care and doing nothing simply means costs will continue to spiral out of control, insurance companies will continue to rape the American people and fewer and fewer people will be covered. Perhaps the GOP is fine with only providing coverage for 3 million of the 45 million now without healthcare, but I for one am not. Especially since "doing nothing" doesn't mean everything will stay the same for people now covered. Already, 30% hikes in the cost of insurance are not only possible, they are happening.

It might not be perfect, but nothing ever is. Pass the bill, move on and stop bellyaching.

Lucille BeyondBabedom.com of NJ 3:50PM March 03, 2010

Does anyone care that apparently a good majority of voters polled do not want this bill passed?

George D. of GA 2:09PM March 02, 2010

Time for them all to go

Republican vs Democrat - does it really matter?

It's time to stop the finger pointing and vote for "REAL" change.

If anyone votes for "ANY" incumbent you are just asking for more of the same. “We the people” need to make a "No Incumbent" stance for the next 6 years and cycle everyone of them out of office.

Just look at the last year, if the health care takeover was such a great bill the Democrats had all the votes they needed. They didn’t need a single Republican vote and they couldn't pull it off. Add to the fact that if this health care bill is so good for the people, then why aren't every elected official required to be on the same plan?

Then go back a few years to when the Republicans held the house and senate, they spent money like a bunch of drunk sailors. And guess what a lot of the same Republicans are still there.

If we do not hold OUR representatives accountable then this is our fault, no one else’s.

VOTE NO TO IMCUMBENTS

IN 2010, 2012, & 2014

Larry of CA 10:18AM March 02, 2010

Subscribe Today

Want Your Whispers First?

Get the original Washington Whispers in an all new digital form. Check out U.S. News Weekly today.

advertisement

Washington Whispers

Chamber of Commerce Vows to Spend Big in 2012

U.S. Chamber of Commerce says it will continue ad buys, social media strategy to win in 2012

Twitter and Facebook

Whispers on the Web

Friend Paul on Facebook.

Follow Paul on Twitter.

Latest Video

Bobbles Poll

Bobbles Poll: Who's Fault For Congressional Gridlock?

House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have been fighting for a year on virtually every big congressional initiative and 2012 should be a repeat. Which leader is to blame for the gridlock in Washington?

View Results