Historic Whispers: Barack Obama Vs. Ronald Reagan on the Economy

February 18, 2009 RSS Feed Print

We decided to look back at a president who held very different economic views than President Barack Obama holds. In Ronald Reagan's first weeks of office in 1981, the Republican president strove to chop out a good portion of the federal budget, which at the time stood at $663 billion and is less than the total cost of the stimulus bill that Obama signed into law. Known as a good communicator, Reagan received a B-plus from political analysts on his ability to sell his programs to the American people but a C-minus on organizing his administration.

  • To show Congress that he means business about slashing the budget, "Ronald Reagan will veto more bills than any president in history," predicts a senior White House adviser. (Feb. 9, 1981)
  • The Senate's new Republican bosses lost no time in letting Ted Kennedy know what it really means to be in the minority. Kennedy has been evicted from the spacious quarters he occupied across the hall from the Judiciary Committee that he used to head. His new digs: A distant suite formerly used by defeated Democratic Sen. Herman Talmadge of Georgia. (Feb. 9, 1981)
  • From political analysts comes this rating of Ronald Reagan's performance after three weeks in office: Selling his programs to the public: B-plus; organizing his administration: C-minus; dealing with Congress: B-plus; putting his stamp on foreign affairs: B-minus. Overall rating: a solid B. (Feb. 16, 1981)
  • Nancy Reagan, intimates report, remains serene in the midst of news reports criticizing her expensive tastes in clothes and furnishings. "It's only when somebody attacks her husband that she really gets steamed," notes a family friend. (Feb. 16, 1981)
  • No matter how deeply Reagan seeks to slash the federal budget, Capitol Hill veterans predict, there is a maximum amount beyond which Congress cannot be pushed. The consensus ceiling on spending trims this year: No more than 6 billion dollars out of a budget totaling 663 billion. (Feb. 23, 1981)
  • Even while praise pours in for his performance on television, aides say, the president intends to step up addresses to the nation on radio. Reason: Reagan, who made a living and reputation delivering hundreds of radio commentaries, still regards it as his best medium of communication. (Feb. 23, 1981)
  • Some of Reagan's old California friends breathed sighs of relief when Frank Sinatra won a license to help run a Las Vegas gambling casino. The president's cronies hope the controversial entertainer, who arranged inaugural entertainment and attended Reagan's recent birthday party, will stay busy in Nevada and spend less time in Washington, where they fear he could create problems embarrassing to Reagan. (Feb. 23, 1981)
  • Contrary to custom, the code name for Reagan used during the election campaign by Secret Service agents in radio messages will not be changed now that he is president. Reagan likes the name—"Rawhide"—so much that he asked it to be retained. Nancy Reagan's code name: "Rainbow." (Feb. 23, 1981)
  • Now that Ronald Reagan has made two major televised speeches on his economic plan, he intends to maintain a low profile while his aides do the "hard sell." The president's advisers fear he is becoming overexposed in the news media. (March 2, 1981).

Follow Paul and Nikki on Twitter.

Check out more of the new Washington Whispers.

Tags:
Nancy Reagan,
Barack Obama,
Ronald Reagan

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It is definitely evident that history repeats itself.

If Obama took heed of that, America would not be going into economic downfall.

Reagan, as Stan (above) mentioned, started with low votes, but because of his work ethic and persistency to get the job done, the poll numbers skyrocketed.

Obama on the other hand, although he has a few great ideas, has led this country into a crisis.

Erika of NY 8:27AM February 28, 2011

It is definitely evident that history repeats itself.

If Obama took heed of that, America would not be going into economic downfall.

Reagan, as Stan (above) mentioned, started with low votes, but because of his work ethic and persistency to get the job done, the poll numbers skyrocketed.

Obama on the other hand, although he has a few great ideas, has led this country into a crisis.

Erika of NY 8:27AM February 28, 2011

Why would we compare you to Jesus?

BetterThanYou of NJ 11:49AM April 05, 2010

Subscribe Today

Want Your Whispers First?

Get the original Washington Whispers in an all new digital form. Check out U.S. News Weekly today.

advertisement

Washington Whispers

Website Collects Humorous Deleted Tweets

'Politwoops' aims to make politicians more transparent

Twitter and Facebook

Whispers on the Web

Friend Paul on Facebook.

Follow Paul on Twitter.

Latest Video

Bobbles Poll

Bobbles Poll: Who's Fault For Congressional Gridlock?

House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have been fighting for a year on virtually every big congressional initiative and 2012 should be a repeat. Which leader is to blame for the gridlock in Washington?

View Results