Program to Kill Weeds in Wyoming's Grand Teton

February 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print

In the "Your Tax Dollars at Work" category, we have a potential $500,000 weed program for Wyoming's Grand Teton National Park. An Interior Department contract solicitation seeks landscapers who can inventory then kill weeds along some 250 miles or roads. There's no question the weeds are noxious. Anyone who's touched thistle knows that. But aren't national parks supposed to be natural? And it's not just at Teton. The government also wants them gone in Custer, S.D., home to the Black Hills National Forest.

Here's the synopsis for the contract:

The Department of Interior, National Park Service, Grand Teton National Park, are seeking interested sources that can provide all labor, supervision, equipment, supplies, services, permits, licensing, and transportation to accomplish weed treatment and weed inventory services. Specifically sources will need to be able to provide treating noxious weeds, providing treatment data and conducting weed infestation inventory. A significant portion of weed treatment will occur along road corridors within Grand Teton National Park (GTNP) located in Western Wyoming. All Wyoming state listed weeds a long with Berteroa incana, Hoary alyssum, Cardaria draba, Whitetop, Carex feta, Greensheath sedge, Carduus nutans, Musk thistle, Centaurea maculosa, Spotted knapweed, Centaurea repens, Russian knapweed, Chondrilla juncea, Rush skeletonweed, Chrysanthemum leucanthemum, Oxeye daisy, Cirsium arvense, Canada thistle, Cirsium vulgare, Bull thistle, Convolvulus arvensis, Field Bindweed, Cynoglossum officinale, Houndstongue, Elaeagnus augustifolia, Russian olive, Euphorbia esula, Leafy spurge, Hieracium aurantiacum, Orange hawkweed, Hieracium fendleri, Yellow hawkweed, Hyoscyamus niger, Black Henbane, Hypericum perforatum, St. Johnswort, Isatis tinctoria, Dyers woad, Lepidium latifolium, Perennial pepperweed, Linaria genistifolia, Dalmation toadflax, Linaria vulgaris, Yellow toadflax, Potentilla recta, Sulfur cinquefoil, Tamarix ramosissima, Salt Cedar, Tanacetum vulgare, Common tansy, Verbascum thapsus, Common mullein, are to be treated chemically and/or mechanically on approximately 275 miles of road shoulder. Area to be inspected and treated if needed extends 30 feet from the edge of bare roadway. Treatment in old hayfield areas and areas of limited accessibility may also occur. Equipment being used for the requirements under this contract shall be cleaned prior to entering the park and cleaning may be required between sites. Supply of water may or may not be available in the local area of work, if not; the contractor will be required to furnish water. Services provided are to be performed during the base year of June 1, 2009, through May 31, 2010, and with the possibility of four option years ending no later than June 1, 2014. Work shall commence when target plants are actively growing and weather conditions make them most susceptible to herbicide effects as per the manufacturers' recommendations. Individual task orders will identify specific start work and completion dates. However work will generally begin on or around June 1st of each year. The NAICS code for this procurement is 115310, with a size standard of $7M.

Corrected on 2/11/09: An earlier version of this article incorrectly listed the price for the weeding program. The program will actually cost less than $100,000 per year for five years.

Tags:
Wyoming

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I live in Grand Teton National Park. Noxious weeds are spreading throughout this beautiful Park. This is a very serious matter not some off the wall joke. In fact noxious weeds are a huge problem all along the Rocky Mountains.

Up until the late 1950’s much of the parkland was privately held and farmed or ranched. Today the remnants of these agricultural activities as well as any area previously turned, such as road right a ways, are easy targets for noxious weeds.

Seven million bucks is a bargain when one considers the loss of a National Park.

Bob Falligant of WY 7:05PM February 10, 2009

There is a gross error in this article online today, February 10, regarding a contract for weed eradication in Grand Teton National Park. Paul Bedard erroneously claims that the project is for $7 million. In truth, the $7 million is simply a threshold for determining a small business size that would be eligible to bid-- as a small business -- for the contract. The project is no where near this large amount. In fact, the project is anticipated to be less than $100,000 a year for five years -- a far cry from the erroneous pronouncement made by Paul Bedard. He has unfortunately misconstrued the NAICS code for this procurement announcement. Once again, the $7 million is ONLY an NAICS code or designation for determining an eligible business operator that might qualify.

Jackie Skaggs of WY 7:04PM February 10, 2009

Paul,

Please do some basic research on the biological and economical costs that non-native plants pose for native plants and animals in a national park like Grand Teton. Elimination of exotic plants (weeds) is a significant problem and one recognized as essential to preserving natural systems in any area -- not just in a national park. To imply that this is a frivilous project is disingenuous and shows a lack of research on your part to present the complete picture. As noxious (non-native species) of weeds gain a foot hold, they quickly and significantly reduce the natural forage for the very wildlife that the park is mandated to protect. This problem includes such species as tamarisk in southwestern regions, spotted knapweed for vast areas across the West, as well as kudzu in the South. The Kelly hayfields are riff with plants that elk, bison, deer, moose and pronghorn antelop avoid because these weeds an not palatable. Exotic weeds have no natural regulation, and therefore spread quickly and prolifically, eventually choking out the very forage that wildlife depend upon. Rather than present half the story, why don't you do some background research on noxious weeds and then explain to your readers how they adversely impact natural areas, causing economic damage to both states and national park units. This is information that is easily and widely found in news stories and biological reports.

Jackie Skaggs of WY 3:43PM February 10, 2009

Subscribe Today

Want Your Whispers First?

Get the original Washington Whispers in an all new digital form. Check out U.S. News Weekly today.

advertisement

Washington Whispers

Website Collects Humorous Deleted Tweets

'Politwoops' aims to make politicians more transparent

Twitter and Facebook

Whispers on the Web

Friend Paul on Facebook.

Follow Paul on Twitter.

Latest Video

Bobbles Poll

Bobbles Poll: Who's Fault For Congressional Gridlock?

House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have been fighting for a year on virtually every big congressional initiative and 2012 should be a repeat. Which leader is to blame for the gridlock in Washington?

View Results