By EILEEN SULLIVAN and LOLITA C. BALDOR, Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — The nearly 20 often-rambling emails that an Army psychiatrist sent to Yemeni terror leader Anwar al-Awlaki painted a confusing picture.
In some, he was a believer intent on supporting terrorists and intrigued with the idea of U.S. soldiers killing comrades in the name of Islam. In others, he was a man looking for help finding an appropriate wife.
In the end, they weren't enough for the FBI to identify Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan as a terrorist threat or, as it would turn out, as a man who now stands accused of the 2009 shooting spree at Fort Hood that killed 13. More than two dozen were wounded.
The emails attracted the attention of FBI and anti-terrorism task force agents in December 2008 and eventually prompted them to dig up Hasan's personnel records and evaluation reports.
But gaps in the bureau's systems, poor training, antiquated technologies and an underlying fear that approaching Hasan would reveal the ongoing investigation into al-Awlaki prevented the FBI from pursuing the matter much further.
An independent review released Thursday by the FBI lays out a series of gaffes the bureau made as agents evaluated Hasan's correspondence with al-Awlaki and ultimately decided the Army major was not a terror threat. The report, by former FBI Director William Webster, concludes that FBI personnel made mistakes in their handling of intelligence information but that no one person was responsible.
"We do not find, and do not believe, that anyone is solely responsible for mistakes in handling the information," Webster wrote to FBI Director Robert Mueller in a letter with the report. "We do not believe it would be fair to hold these dedicated personnel, who work in a context of constant threats and limited resources, responsible for the tragedy that occurred months later at Fort Hood."
Much was already known about the series of oversights and missteps the government made leading to the terror attack at the Fort Hood Army post, but the report revealed new details.
The report describes the back-and-forth that went on between agents in Washington and task force members reviewing the emails in San Diego.
The FBI in San Diego had been investigating al-Awlaki, a former San Diego resident, for his possible connections to the 9/11 hijackers. When agents saw emails between Hasan and al-Awlaki, they asked the FBI's Washington office to talk to Hasan's bosses.
The Washington office said no.
The agents in Washington told Webster's investigators that an interview might have jeopardized the FBI's probe of Hasan by revealing that the bureau had access to his emails with al-Awalaki.
And, the report said, the FBI agents believed that an interview and contact with Hasan's chain-of-command might jeopardize Hasan's military career
The FBI ultimately concluded that Hasan's communications were in keeping with his research at the time, and as a result, no formal investigation of Hasan was opened. Hasan was writing a research paper about the effects of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Webster's report says that al-Awlaki deserved scrutiny by the FBI in Washington beyond a simple records check and said it was a mistake not to have interviewed Hasan.
The emails began in December 2008,and the last one was sent in June 2009. His first one laid out a question: What would al-Awlaki think of Muslims who have joined the military and "have even killed or tried to kill" other U.S. soldiers?
Other emails laid out a defense of Hamas, while a series of others pressed al-Awlaki to make it easier for people to donate money to his website.
In one, he mentions a survey about the U.S. trying to undermine Islam, and in another, he talks about a speaker he heard that defended suicide bombers.
Another note added a "PS": "I'm looking for a wife that is willing to strive with me to please Allah," Hasan wrote. "I will strongly consider a recommendation coming from you."