• Comment (2)

White House threatens to veto GOP business tax cut

April 17, 2012 RSS Feed Print

By ALAN FRAM, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House threatened Tuesday to veto an effort by House Republicans to cut taxes for millions of smaller businesses, calling it an unproductive giveaway to many of the country's most profitable companies.

The warning was issued two days before the GOP-run House is expected to approve the legislation, which Republicans say would kindle job creation. Even without President Barack Obama in the way, passage was expected to be little more than an election-year political statement because the measure is all but sure to die in the Democratic-led Senate.

The veto threat came on the last day for taxpayers to send their income tax returns to the Internal Revenue Service without requesting an extension.

That deadline has prompted both parties to use the week to push legislation telegraphing their tax priorities to voters focused on an economy that is not providing enough jobs. On Monday, Senate Republicans swatted down a Democratic "Buffett rule" bill backed by Obama that would impose a 30 percent tax on the incomes of the wealthiest Americans.

The House legislation, sponsored by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., would provide a 20 percent tax deduction to most businesses with fewer than 500 employees. That would cover 99.9 percent of U.S. companies, according to Census Bureau data for 2007, the most recent year available.

"We're not saying that this is the panacea for everything," Cantor told reporters, saying the GOP thinks the best answer would be a wide-scale overhaul of the tax code that would include lower rates. "But since the other side will not join us in an honest tax reform discussion, we believe that right now it is urgent that we help our job creators."

In effect, Cantor's legislation would let companies reduce the bottom-line income on their tax returns by 20 percent before determining their tax liability. The tax break would last for one year at a cost to the Treasury of $46 billion.

In a written statement, the White House said Obama's top advisers would urge him to veto the bill if it reached his desk.

The bill "is not focused on cutting taxes for small businesses, but instead would provide tax cuts to the most fortunate. Under the bill's definition of income, many of the 'small businesses' that would receive the largest breaks are law partners, consultants and other wealthy individuals and corporations with the largest profits."

Nearly half, or 49 percent, of the tax breaks in the House measure would go to companies with income exceeding $1 million, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, which analyzes tax legislation. Companies and people earning that much money account for just 503,000 of the roughly 165 million individual and corporate taxpayers in the country, or about one-third of one percent of them, according to statistics from the center.

Obama has proposed creating a 10 percent tax credit — an amount that would be subtracted from a firm's tax liability — for companies that increase their payrolls this year. That measure has an $18 billion price tag.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Tags:
United States,
Associated Press,
business

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Paris Hilton (registered small business) does not need a tax cut. Neither do the others multi-millionaire businesses and individuals. Huge companies split off smaller parts of themselves and register that part as a small business...it's legal, but totally fraudulent as to what it purports to represent. It's a typical GOP ploy to make sure that "them that's got, GETS MORE" and "them that don't got, DON'T GET" GOP is so transparent on whose backside they want to kiss, and it isn't the American people, who they just want to kiss-off.

Donna Crane of AZ 3:47AM April 19, 2012

The President is on target here. People don't start businesses or add an employee based on tax liability. That's just an excuse to make more profit, and I don't blame them for trying it on, but the social fabric needs the income. We can't really afford the $18 billion for businesses that can jolly well take care of their own profit while using public roads and services, but we can afford it much more than the $48 billion cost of Rep. Cantor's proposal.

Cynthia of CA 9:39AM April 18, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos