Dems Optimistic Stimulus Bill Will Pass in Senate, but Warn Margin May Be Thin

Democratic senators predict victory but are lowering expectations on how many GOP votes they will win

January 30, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

After the House passed an $819 billion stimulus package this week without a single Republican vote, Democratic senators said today that they're hopeful that the bill could have more bipartisan support on their side of the Capitol.

That's particularly crucial because the Senate, unlike the House, can't pass the bill without a handful of Republicans crossing the aisle. To avoid a Republican filibuster, Senate Democrats need 59 votes. (The number is one vote less than the usual 60 because of the vacancy from Minnesota's still-contested Senate race). Currently, there are 56 Democratic Senate seats.

While Senate Democrats lobby for GOP support, however, they also seem to be lowering expectations. New York Sen. Charles Schumer said today that the bill's passage, not a truly bipartisan vote, should be the priority. "The important number here is not the number of Republican votes. The important issue is the number of jobs the bill creates," Schumer said. "And getting the 60 votes we need is the key question, not whether we get 70 or 80." President Obama said at one point that he hoped to see 80 votes for the stimulus.

To even get those 60 votes, however, Democrats are planning to try to sweeten the bill with some amendments palatable to the GOP. And if some Republicans think that not enough spending is weighted toward infrastructure, Schumer says, he'll offer an amendment to expand funding for mass transit similar to the $3 billion expansion in the House bill. Senators Patty Murray and Dianne Feinstein are also planning infrastructure-related amendments, he says.

Even so, Democrats seem determined that Republicans won't prevail on what they are pushing for the hardest—a reweighting of the stimulus package toward tax cuts rather than spending.

Some Republicans want "a repeat of last spring's stimulus, which was not particularly effective," says Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed. "That's just staying the course, and we have to change course dramatically."

The Senate will start debate on the bill on Monday. 

Tags:
House of Representatives,
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Alone Contact,remain will confidence encourage battle generation terrible demand attach suggestion everything metal visitor drink pupil lady equal touch product route yes nevertheless win book discuss dog warm decide rural another activity compare well seriously eat hill potential chairman see pub dark neither require aware educational use permanent of consider direct today reject paper could bone home speed lip second appear rapidly faith before usually enemy request spot right expensive strategy spring rise description deal south ancient down supply enable party wine route society drop inside module friend until milk

italien hotel of 5:07PM April 30, 2010

How can you vote on anything, sign anything, without reading what you have been TOLD to sign or vote on?

HELLO........this is being rammed down the throats of everyone.

This is not Nazi Germany, and hopefully our Senators and Congress can READ!

patti of WA 2:43PM February 13, 2009

As a nation we got ourselves into this mess by not wisely managing our finances. The government, no matter how lavishly it spends, can not right the wrongs of our financial institutions by promoting more bad habits. The average American saves less then 3 percent of their income, the federal government is proposing to spend more money on one bill than the entire cost of the Iraq war to date, showing its complete lack of concern for fiscal responsibility. If I owe you money and the fed gives you money, how does that help me pay you back? If the administration were truly concerned with stimulating the economy and not growing the role of government in my daily dealings they would consult financial successes instead of aging congressmen and women who know nothing about the real world and how our wallets work. Ask the ceo's of Mcdonalds, Walmart, or even Donald Trump what they think about this huge barrel of pork that our elected employees in government are trying to railroad through the senate. Simply doing nothing IS better than recklessly spending our grandchildrens chance for financial prosperity. Where do these people think this money will come from? More debt from China perhaps? or maybe we can just print more money until a gallon of milk costs us a wheelbarrow full of cash. Let us not forget also that the TVA and public works of FDR's aministration did not get us out of the great depression, WWII did. How it can be concieved as wise to dump loads of borrowed cash into a broken economy is lost on me. (and a lot of far more educated economic analysts) The answer to this "crisis" is to let the market take care of itself. Survival of the fittest. The weak poorly managed companies, i.e. fanny and freddy and old goldman sachs, can fall. Smaller more well managed companies can assume those "toxic assetts" and make loans to responsible people who can, one house at a time, fix this mess. The attack media has portrayed the debt collector as the omnipotent bad guy, what would be expected if bills are not payed? When it is all said and done, what would your grandpa do? the men and women of our greatest generation had it figured out, a trillion borrowed dollars to prop up a broken system is unforgiveable. A wise plan to address a serious cultural spending problem is probably way beyond a governments capacity, even still now is the time to consider the important phrase "a penny saved is a penny earned."

michael adams of OH 6:42PM February 07, 2009

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

advertisement

10 Not So 'Recession-Proof' Industries

These industries long though to be safe from economic downturn have proven themselves to be anything but.

Do you think the stimulus bill contains too much pork?

View Results

advertisement