Stimulus Debate Moves to Senate After Passing in House With No GOP Support

January 29, 2009 RSS Feed Print

The House passed the $819 billion stimulus bill yesterday, but the weeks of attempts to get bipartisan support behind the package failed. Not a single Republican voted in favor.

The bill passed by a vote of 244 to 188, with 11 Democrats crossing the aisle to oppose the bill. The GOP's firm opposition comes as a disappointment for the new administration, which had emphasized the importance of bipartisanship in the process. President Obama himself held a closed-door meeting with Republican legislators on Tuesday to try to win their backing.

In a statement, however, Obama said he was "grateful" for the House passage. "There are many numbers in this plan," his statement said. "But of all these numbers, there is one that matters most to me: This recovery plan will save or create more than 3 million new jobs over the next few years."

There may be more bipartisan support for the bill in the Senate, however, where the Senate Finance Committee added $70 billion to the tax cuts portion of the package. And some Republicans who voted against the bill in the House have said they may support it if some of their worries about the amount of spending in the bill are addressed.

The House stimulus bill includes $275 billion in tax cuts and nearly $545 billion in spending. During the debate, $3 billion was added to the bill for mass transit. Another amendment that was added expanded the bill's whistleblower protections, which had applied to only state and local whistleblowers in the original version, to include federal employees.

The bill will be debated in the Senate next week.

Tags:
House of Representatives,
Senate,
Congress,
economic stimulus,
politics,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

People are suffering, people are losing jobs and homes, families are struggling to put food on the table, and children are having to do without because of the state of this economy. Thanks to those who contributed to it.

This is not the time for people to prove how much they can control the English language and show how wonderful they can think, eventhough they are the same people that watched the country as it was dragged to the slaughter house.

People are suffering!! For some reason it is hard for these GOPS to understand that when the government spends on infrastructure, it will create jobs... what is so hard about it???

I do not know how much tax cut would stimulate me to go and buy anything. I would rather I have to option to find a better job than to be stucked where I am and be unhappy because there are no jobs.

This is a sad situation and these people debating and blocking this procedure -- do not have a clue what the ordinary man is going through. I just hope the have the country at heart not their only selfish ambition which have brought us here in the first place.

swrousy of NC 1:33PM February 07, 2009

Really where were these GOP know alls when the country was spending billions of dollars on a useless war??? where were they when this country was being led into the slaughter house by the Bush administration??? where were they???--wonderful watch dogs as they seem to be portraying themselves!!!! My only advise to them is to SHUT the ****** UP and let somebody fix the mess that was created under their watch.

SWROUSY of NC 1:20PM February 07, 2009

Stop Spending? Cut payroll taxes? I hate to see the company you run, Leigh. Yes, this situatuion is something none of us have seen before but we can learn a lot form the steps FDR took. It is time for conservatives to stop hating FDR and recognize that if he failed in any way it was that he did not spend enough and did not act fast enough. The country we have today is built on the projects that FDR strong armed into the system. Unfortunately so many of the projects we have from that time are crumbling due to lack of funding and corruption.

Reagan gave us "trickle down economics." It worked well as an elegantly worded scam to flood the wealthy with easy access to wealth while charming the poor into thinking their representatives cared about their needs. Now let's appreciate what a smart government can do for the masses once again. I, for one, do not know how to build a highway and doubt it will get done if the government lets us keep our own money (or shall I say China's money).

And also let's not hear any more complaints about the $50,000,000 for the arts. FDR created the WPA which had an arts and murals division. Some of Americas most celebrated artists were able to survive the depression working on those projects. The amount proposed for the arts is a small amount, and a culture without the arts is no culture I want to be a part of.

Harold Porcher of NJ 1:44PM January 30, 2009

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

advertisement

10 Not So 'Recession-Proof' Industries

These industries long though to be safe from economic downturn have proven themselves to be anything but.

Do you think the stimulus bill contains too much pork?

View Results

advertisement