Obama Signals Higher Church-State Barrier for Faith-Based Office

February 5, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)
President Barack Obama speaks during the National Prayer Breakfast at the Washington Hilton in Washington, DC.

President Barack Obama speaks during the National Prayer Breakfast at the Washington Hilton.

In launching his White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships today, President Barack Obama signaled that he would erect a higher barrier between church and state than George W. Bush did with his faith-based office. But Obama postponed a decision on the most contentious issue surrounding the office: whether to allow religious groups to hire on the basis of religion for federally funded positions, as Bush did.

"He's leaving all the substantive options and directions open" on the question of faith-based hiring, says Ira Lupu, a George Washington University Law School professor who specializes in church-state issues. "He's saying, 'Let's see what the lawyers tell me.' "

Obama's executive order establishing the office, which he signed after addressing this morning's National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, creates a mechanism for the office to consult with the White House legal counsel and the Justice Department to sort through complex legal issues like faith-based hiring.

While giving hope to religious organizations like World Vision, which has said it will back out of faith-based initiatives if forced to alter its hiring practices, Obama's delay on a hiring decision upset church-state separation watchdogs and liberal religious groups.

"President Obama needs to make good on his campaign promise that tax dollars aren't used to unconstitutionally discriminate on the basis of religion," said Kathryn Kolbert, president of People for the American Way.

She added: "It's disappointing that today President Obama has missed an opportunity to put it into practice immediately.

World Vision disagreed. "The president is taking a very practical and responsible approach to the whole issue of faith-based initiatives, including religious hiring rights issues," Joe Mettimano, the group's vice president for advocacy, said in an interview.

Until Obama formally reverses the Bush policy exempting faith-based organizations from following nondiscrimination rules with federal funds, such groups can continue to use faith-based hiring, legal experts said.

The newly named director of the Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships Office, Joshua DuBois, said that it was impossible to give a timeline for resolving the hiring issue and that resolution might come on a case-by-case basis, rather than in a sweeping policy directive.

"This is an area of unclear policy and practice, but we can now begin seeking the advice of government and outside actors and see what groups are doing on the ground," said DuBois, who had previously served as religious outreach director of Obama's presidential campaign. "The previous administration made decisions without understanding the state of law and practice."

On the campaign trail last year, Obama vowed to reverse the Bush hiring policy. "As someone who used to teach constitutional law, I believe deeply in the separation of church and state," Obama said last July in a speech that pledged to expand Bush's office of faith-based initiatives. "If you get a federal grant, you can't use that grant money to proselytize to the people you help, and you can't discriminate against them—or against the people you hire—on the basis of their religion."

Supporters of that position, including the political left, secular groups, and some religious minorities, said they still hope that Obama reverses the Bush policy on hiring. "They ran into the reality that this is a complex issue that pits moral principals against one another," said Rabbi David Saperstein of the Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism, who has advised the administration on faith issues and supports reversing the Bush policy. "They want to get it right, and they are trying to walk a tightrope."

The decision to seek legal review of faith-based hiring before deciding on the matter mirrors a recommendation from a Brookings Institution report on faith-based initiatives issues last year, which the Obama administration has used as a road map for navigating legal, political and operational issues of faith based initiatives. The Brookings report advises against allowing religious organizations to engage in federally funded faith-based hiring. One of its principal authors, Wake Forest Divinity School professor Melissa Rogers, sits on a White House advisory committee on faith-based initiatives, which also was announced today.

Tags:
religion,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I'm a Christian and operated an after school program with a government grant. I am in favor of NEVER establishing a state religion-what a hideous beast that would be-neither serving the people nor serving God. History should show us that human beings are not to be trusted with that much power (imagine the pope of the USA!), because we are too inherently selfish to handle it.

On the other hand, to force a religious organization to hire someone who does not share their beliefs is to do harm to that organization. Respect people's beliefs-viva la difference!!! I respect atheists and Muslims and Hindus. They have the right to evangelize for their position. Christians should have that right as well. Let the believers speak and let the people choose. The fact is, no one can be forced to believe or not believe anything.

It would be wrong to force an Islamic group to hire a pig farmer. That would be repugnant to them. It would be wrong to force Catholics to hire a Satan worshipper. Yet faith-based groups do much good in the community and with far less money than government programs do. To help them deliver services in the community without forcing them to abandon their beliefs just makes sense.

Jeanine of FL 11:50AM February 07, 2009

I have repeatedly stated and will continue to state until someone answers my question "What did Barak Obama and Oprah Winfrey know about the forklift that was dropped on cousin Mark Selden's head, and almost killed him, at work in Chicago, IL, on March 4, 2007 (Coincidentally the very same morning that many of the Solomon family left the Chicago area to travel to Kansas City, MO area). He was then sent to 70 Witchwood Lane Lindenhirst, IL (Coincidentally of course)! What did they also know about Aunt Bertha Selden's sudden and unexpected death on TUESDAY, March 4, 2008, when she was nowhere near death and the Chicago hospital called the family and asked what they should do with her body? I can assure you I WILL NOT STOP ASKING THESE QUESTIONS UNTIL I GET ANSWERS! If I or any of my family members had ever been a part of such absolute inexcusable murderous corruption I would expect that I would be looked upon as shameful beyond words. Those people that do not play the game by the rules are disqualified! What are the answers to these questions? I would like to have immediate answers!

Deborah Solomon

Independence,MO

Deborah Solomon of MO 11:28PM February 06, 2009

what about those tax deductable donations to churches? should that be ended? and what about tax exemption for churches? that too should go.

vexact 9:46PM February 06, 2009

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

advertisement

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.