California Ruling in Episcopal Church Dispute Deals Setback to Breakaway Parishes Nationwide

A court blocked parishes from holding onto property after spliting from the main church

January 8, 2009 RSS Feed Print

A California Supreme Court decision this week that blocked three breakaway Episcopal Church parishes from holding onto their church buildings and property marks the latest in a string of legal victories for the national church and casts doubt on the efforts of other parishes to keep church grounds as they secede from the Episcopal Church over what they see as its liberal drift on matters like the ordination of gay clergy.

The Episcopal Church, with 2.1 million members, hopes the California ruling also sets a precedent for the property rights of the national denomination as several whole dioceses that have left the church attempt to keep their buildings and property. The ruling's implications for legal fights at the diocesan level are less clear.

"If the court had ruled against the national church, it could have given legal support for the development of the so-called new province," Trinity College religion scholar Frank Kirkpatrick says, referring to a coalition of four U.S. Episcopal dioceses and dozens more parishes that recently announced plans to start a rival denomination.

Until now, the Episcopal Church has served as the sole North American province of the Anglican Communion, the world's third-largest Christian body, which is led by the archbishop of Canterbury.

In accepting the Episcopal Church's argument for maintaining ownership of its property, says Kirkpatrick, author of The Episcopal Church in Crisis, the decision is likely to deter other breakaway parishes from suing for their property. "It's very costly to go to court," he says, "and if the trend is not to recognize the authority of the local congregation, what's the point?"

Experts on the Episcopal Church said the ruling would be a likely bellwether for similar legal skirmishes over property between the national church and local parishes in half a dozen other states. That's what the Episcopal Church is hoping for. "The California Supreme Court's decision was precedent-setting," said John R. Shiner, chancellor for the Episcopal diocese of Los Angeles and the church's lead counsel in the California litigation. "It clarified to a large degree what the rules will be going forward and will the basis for clarification elsewhere."

In the unanimous California decision, handed down Monday, the court ruled that "although the deeds to the property have long been in the name of the local church, that church agreed from the beginning of its existence to be part of the greater church and to be bound by its governing documents. These governing documents make clear that church property is held in trust for the general church. . . ."

In the United States, courts have ruled in recent years on roughly a dozen property dispute cases between the Episcopal Church and breakaway parishes, and the decisions have almost always been in favor of the mother church. The major exception has been in Virginia, where an unusual Civil War-era statute on "divided" property has helped nine breakaway Episcopal parishes in their legal fight to keep their property. That case appears to be headed to the state Supreme Court.

According to the Episcopal Church, 83 parishes have voted to leave the church, out of a total of about 7,100 parishes. Some of those breakaway churches have aligned themselves with conservative Anglican bishops in Africa and elsewhere in the so-called Global South, where Anglicanism is experiencing rapid growth. In the United States, the Episcopal Church is losing members.

In the face of the California ruling, breakaway churches have vowed to continue working to launch an alternative Anglican denomination in North America, even if it means losing church property. "Parishes are not choosing to leave the Episcopal Church because of their estimation of the possibility of maintaining ownership of property but because of significant theological disagreements," a spokesman for Bishop Robert Duncan, the leader of the conservative breakaway dioceses and parishes, said in an interview on Tuesday. "This decision doesn't begin to change that."

Indeed, Episcopal Church experts said that even as the legal wrangling over property subsides, the rifts within the U.S. church—which ordained its first openly gay bishop in 2003—and between the U.S. church and the provinces of the Anglican Communion in the more culturally conservative Global South would continue to widen. "The Anglican communion globally is undergoing profound change," says the Rev. Ian T. Douglas, professor of mission and world Christianity at Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, Mass. "What has historically been a monocultural church in the West is becoming a global phenomenon which embraces many races and cultures like never before."

Though that growing diversification is often seen through the lens of church growth in Global South regions like Africa, Douglas says that it is also evident in expanding roles for gays and women in the U.S. Episcopal Church.

Tags:
Christianity,
California,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Off Tea,collection direction metal open afternoon overall sexual table day space sorry definition himself user citizen woman conduct advice leading direct studio staff few which bedroom economy obviously life leg economy rapidly go leg on admit land range listen able off duty accept former strong understand leader generate look dog species version centre open programme blow quarter careful deep control fee contain ring prison ignore force cos module various which road they interest chairman love right investigate possibly line interview down commit blood she

hotels in riezlern of 10:42AM April 20, 2010

The Community of Christ is doing the same thing in regards to the original name of the RLDS church. They have sued true members holding to and practicing the original doctrines because we call ourselves by the name we always have...RLDS. They have decided to abandon both the truth and the name of the church by calling themselves Community of Christ, but are angry that those who will not flow the perversions of the gospel would dare to continue the truth by the name we have always had. The church of "peace" is suing people they claim as their own members. Quite peaceful, huh?

Holly of MO 8:36AM January 18, 2010

Hmm. Now the Scriptures on which the Church is founded strictly forbid taking fellow-Christians before the secular courts, which fact any believer is, I think, sure to notice on their first reading of the New Testament which is hardly a long or hard-to-read volume. A Christian leader, then should certainly know better than to sue a church for their properties. Do we need to examine how the words "Christian," and, "leader" apply here? One wonders.

As for the court, they seem to have overlooked the fact that the diocese is established as the basic unit of the Church. The province (in this case, the Episcopal Church in the USA) is a gathering of the dioceses for mutual comfort and support in ministry. So, legally, can the "plaintiff" be more than an interested observer?

Applying the same logic to civil law, a woman could build a business but, if she leaves her cheating, abusive, husband, he gets all her assets on grounds that they had been in his (her married) name!

Robert of MS 2:43PM January 11, 2009

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

advertisement

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.