• Comment (1)

Challengers outraise GOP incumbents in 1st quarter

May 3, 2012 RSS Feed Print

By HENRY C. JACKSON, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic challengers raised more money than Republican incumbents in 20 competitive House races from California to Virginia during the first three months of the year, and President Barack Obama's party has the upper-hand in eight other districts where congressmen are retiring.

The early look at fundraising, laid out in reports filed with the Federal Election Commission, suggests momentum at this point may be on the Democrats' side as the party tries to wrest control of the House from the GOP.

Even so, the amounts candidates themselves have raised so far provide only a slice of the broader campaign finance picture.

Washington-based campaign committees that work to elect House Republicans and Democrats are sitting on stockpiles of cash they'll spend on the most competitive races, another area where Obama's party at this point has an edge. Outside groups aligned with both parties also are expected to spend millions of dollars to influence the outcome of several dozen competitive races.

Money matters, this year especially.

Candidates and parties alike will need hefty sums to pay for TV commercials and get-out-the-vote efforts that usually are more expensive in a presidential election year.

Democrats were quick to brag about their candidates' hauls.

"Nobody wants to make a bad investment," said Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which works to elect House Democrats.

Republicans just as swiftly downplayed the numbers.

"Our Republican members have more money in the bank and are well-positioned for victory in November," said Andrea Bozek, a spokeswoman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, the campaign arm for House Republicans.

Indeed, while Democratic candidates generally have raised the most money this year, GOP incumbents have more money in the bank than their Democratic rivals in 16 races where Democrats took in more money than Republicans in the first quarter. In some cases, Democrats' hauls are also inflated by self-donations that may or may not continue going forward.

And while the DCCC has brought in $83.6 million to the NRCC's $73.7 million, Democrats have burned through money more quickly. The DCCC had $22.8 million on hand compared to $27.1 million for the NRCC when the fundraising quarter ended in March.

Republicans control the House, 242-190 with three vacancies that were Democratically held seats. Democrats would need a net gain of 25 — plus hold on the three vacant seats — to retake control. That push is complicated by once-a-decade redrawing of congressional district boundaries. The process has made several longtime Democrats more vulnerable and made more Republican the seats of some GOP incumbents that Democrats might otherwise have targeted.

Nevertheless, Israel insisted the House is "within range" of a Democratic takeover but pointedly stopped short of claiming Democrats will take the majority.

House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican, last week suggested that Democrats could well take back the House.

"I would say that there is a 2-in-3 chance that we win control of the House again, but there's a 1-in-3 chance that we could lose," Boehner recently told Fox News. "We've got a big challenge, and we've got work to do."

It's a concession he hadn't made before, but it could have been intended in part to fire up the party's grass-roots backers and deep-pocketed donors.

At first glance, it seems Democrats will have the cash to make it a fight.

Democratic challengers brought in more than Republican incumbents in competitive districts in California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Virginia during the first quarter of the year.

Democrats also took in more than Republicans in eight seats — four they hold, four held by the GOP — that are open because of retirements. That includes races in Arizona, California, Florida, North Dakota, Illinois, Indiana, Texas and Washington.

In some of those districts, Democrats have already turned the first-quarter fundraising into an overall advantage.

In Florida's 10th District, former Orlando Police Chief Val Demings raised $331,598 compared to $148,033 for her opponent, Rep. Daniel Webster. She had $482,251 cash on hand at the end of March compared to $390,621 for Webster.

Tags:
Associated Press,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I wish that Democrats would not lower themselves by accepting huge amounts of money from corporate sources, but I do understand why they feel they must, in order to compete with Republicans, who have had, for several years, donations of huge corporate campaign money for selected candidates. Personally, I constantly worry about the future of my children and grandchildren, living in a country run by corporate power, in cooperation with the financially elite of our country. I worry about the continuing loss of our Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) power in protecting us from environmental hazards, as corporations continue to push push for less regulation of hazardous materials.

I wish American citizens would let it be known, to their Senators and Representatives, that championing corporations to become corporate "citizens," and allowing unlimited donations to political candidates of the corporations' choice, is, actually, destroying democracy. Human citizens are not included in these policies legislated with the full cooperation of corporations and politicians making many state legislative decisions.

http://www.thinkglobalgreen.org/COAL.html

http://www.prwatch.org/news/2012/04/11473/alec%E2%80%99s-vision-pre-empting-epa-coal-ash-regs-passes-house

If West Virginia wants to be the leader in water, land and air pollutants, that is their choice. Unfortunately, those who want clean water, land, and air will, nevertheless, breathe West Virginia's pollutant coal "bombs" because a state cannot contain these pollutants within the state--the pollutants do spread over state lines. So we suffer for West Virginia's allegiance to corporate citizen interest rather than the health of human citizens. In addition, too much pressure is being put on the government to continue their efforts to implement the Clean Water Act.

http://www.examiner.com/article/epa-fails-to-defend-clean-water-act-allows-appointment-of-industry-insiders

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Electric_Power

We also must keep abreast of the EPA's action and inaction on behalf of its human citizens if we want to live on this planet!

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/04/14/epa-colluded-coverup-decades-monsanto-poisoning-118281/

ann keenan of MI 6:37PM May 03, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos