• Comment (5)

Obama and Romney on Energy, Environmental Issues

April 17, 2012 RSS Feed Print

WASHINGTON (AP) — A look at where President Barack Obama and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney stand on energy and environmental issues:

OBAMA: Ordered temporary moratorium on deep-water drilling after the massive BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico but has pushed for more oil and gas drilling overall. Approved drilling plan in Arctic Ocean opposed by environmentalists. Now proposes that Congress give oil market regulators more power to control price manipulation by speculators and stiffer fines for doing so.

Achieved historic increases in fuel economy standards for automobiles that will save money at the pump while raising the cost of new vehicles. Achieved first-ever regulations on heat-trapping gases blamed for global warming and on toxic mercury pollution from power plants. Spent heavily on green energy and has embraced nuclear power as a clean source.

[Read: THE RACE: Obama, Romney Nixing Fed Campaign Funds.]

Failed to persuade a Democratic Congress to pass limits he promised on carbon emissions. Shelved plan to toughen health standards on lung-damaging smog. Rejected Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada because of environmental concerns but supports fast-track approval of a segment of it. Proposes ending subsidies to oil industry but has failed to persuade Congress to do so.

ROMNEY: Supports opening the Atlantic and Pacific outer continental shelves to drilling, as well as Western lands, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and offshore Alaska; and supports exploitation of shale oil deposits. Wants to reduce obstacles to coal, natural gas and nuclear energy development, and accelerate drilling permits in areas where exploration has already been approved for developers with good safety records.

[Read: Obama Sticks Up for Ann Romney.]

Says green power has yet to become viable and the causes of climate change are unknown. Proposes to remove carbon dioxide from list of pollutants controlled by Clean Air Act and amend clean water and air laws to ensure the cost of complying with regulations is balanced against environmental benefit. Says cap and trade would "rocket energy prices."

Blames high gas prices on Obama's decisions to limit oil drilling in environmentally sensitive areas and on overzealous regulation.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Tags:
Associated Press,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Oil is expensive and getting more expensive. I have heard many people say that there is plenty of oil left. Well, that is correct if you are willing to pay the price. The recent developments in fracking are not really recent, that technology has been around since the 70s. The thing is, the price of oil and gas produced by traditional methods was low and so fracking didn't make economic sense. It does now, since the price is up, but if the price does stay up, then it becomes a money loser. So the fact that the oil and gas companies are fracking is confirmation by them that the price is up and will stay up. The same analysis is true for tar sands, off shore drilling and ice cap drilling. They are more expensive recovery techniques and now it's profitable to do them. This will continue to go on, but the oil won't be $80, or $100, or even $120 perbarrel, it will be $200 or $300. Until it's too high and other energy sources become permanently viable. And here in lies the real reason the GOP doesn't like alternatives. We're getting close. In fact, wind is already competitive, solar getting close, hydro-electric (including hydroelectric as wind and solar storage) very viable and biofuels on the verge of viable. So they want to kill all investment in these and fund fossil energy.

brotherkenny of PA 3:20PM April 19, 2012

I am an engineer, having worked on a score of nukes, two score of fossil fueled power plants and decades assessing advanced technologies, e.g. superconductors, ultracapacitors, nanotechnology etc. It is crystal clear to me that American's energy policy, basically do nothing worthwhile, for generations has ground to a halt. Our infrastructure is junk status. This election will tell the tale. Either we built things that work, or the grid will collapse, or our economy will collapse. All green energies (wind, solar electric, etc.) cost too much for base loaded supply. The much touted smart grid is a nice term that allows some bureaucrat to remotely shut off your AC in August because America will lack power plants. It and all political correct energy schemes are hideously expensive, far beyond what people can pay.

The driving force for our defacto energy policy is currently the danger of climate change. IMHO, it is a speculative danger, which, if real, is centuries away. The danger that our grid will decay, or collapse, is yesterday, or years or decades away.

We must make a choice in November. I will vote against Obama.

R. L. Hails Sr. P. E. of MD 11:44AM April 19, 2012

Ron Paul supporters are working on all fronts for the influence to re-Americanize the government.

AmericansElect will field a candidate on the November ballot and patriots who register [any registered voter from any political party or independent can easily become an online delegate in voting for the nominee] ... those in AmericansElect - dot com - have Ron Paul Leading in the first process of qualifying ... in a couple of weeks caucus voting starts and all people who are registered voters are invited to participate. Join the Ron Paul Revolution online. Livin' it.

Third ballot line and/or fourth for Dr. Paul is added incentive for superdelegate support at the Republican convention, and the top goal is to run as Republican nominee. Ron Paul for America.

Also, there is a lot of nice sentiment in the Libertarian Party to draft Dr. Paul as the candidate. Gary Johnson is Libertarian now and actively seeking the nomination. Every one can dream of a presidential ticket with both Ron Paul and Gary Johnson on it, America hasn't seen such a powerhouse for Liberty in the many decades of my lifetime.. that's for sure.

Ron Paul for President, Republican, Independent, Libertarian, AmericansElect the right man for All the People.

John of NY 10:45PM April 17, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos