• Comment (2)

Resentment lingers in Pa. after Santorum's loss

April 6, 2012 RSS Feed Print

By MARC LEVY, Associated Press

GETTYSBURG, Pa. (AP) — Rick Santorum is as unpopular in Pennsylvania today as he was six years ago when home-state voters kicked him out of the Senate in a rout. That sour public perception may doom his fading chances of sticking around in the GOP presidential race, along with other hurdles that dot his path to a possible, and needed, victory in the April 24 primary.

He failed to heal a rift with fiscal conservatives who had lost confidence in him or reassure party leaders that he could temper his hardline positions on social issues that repel the moderate and independent voters who are crucial to success in statewide elections in this diverse state. Even some who know Santorum say he isn't the best candidate.

The former senator also faces a nearly insurmountable hurdle to stop Mitt Romney, who emerged as the nominee-in-waiting after his sweep of contests this week in Wisconsin, Maryland and Washington, D.C.

None of that seems to be deterring Santorum.

"People in Pennsylvania know me," he said this week while campaigning at a Pittsburgh-area diner. "We've got a strong base of support here, and we're going to work very, very hard."

That Pennsylvanians know Santorum may be part of the problem.

He spoke at the state's largest annual gathering of conservatives several weeks ago, yet won a straw vote with less than half the vote. His support in the state also has slipped, according to surveys that highlight his apparent likeability problem.

Santorum is as unpopular now as he was at the time of his defeat. A February poll by Muhlenberg College showed that nearly half the registered voters surveyed viewed him unfavorably. Just 39 percent saw him favorably.

A March 28 poll by Franklin & Marshall College showed Santorum with 30 percent support to Romney's 28 percent among registered Republicans, a significant drop from the 29-point advantage Santorum enjoyed in February.

Santorum's image has suffered under a barrage of negative advertising by the better-funded Romney and his allies. Santorum lately also is battling the perception that Romney will be the nominee. He has complained, at times bitterly, about being badly outspent by Romney in states where he has lost to the former Massachusetts governor.

In 2006, with Democrat Bob Casey comfortably ahead, Santorum met with apprehensive conservative activists who wanted him to explain his enthusiastic support for moderate Republican Sen. Arlen Specter over rising conservative star Pat Toomey in the primary election two years earlier. The activists also sought Santorum's rationale for supporting targeted federal spending, or earmarks, and other fiscal positions they deemed irresponsible.

Santorum, who was his usual combative self and came across as anything but apologetic, argued that his positions should be balanced against everything he'd done throughout his 16 years in the House and Senate.

"The implication was clear that, 'You guys have no choice. There is no other conservative in Pennsylvania, no other viable conservative,'" said Bob Guzzardi, a real estate investor and conservative activist from suburban Philadelphia who said he confronted Santorum at the meeting.

Said Ryan Shafik, a Harrisburg-based Republican campaign strategist: "It basically turned into a hostile meeting and Santorum never acknowledged wrongdoing. ... After that meeting, most of those people came away not helping him. They're not going to go door to door for him after the way he treated them."

Santorum has said he endorsed Specter because Specter agreed to support conservatives nominated to the Supreme Court by President George W. Bush. Specter has said he never made — and never would have made — such a promise.

The sour feelings toward Santorum are also evident in his lack of endorsements from the state GOP establishment. Toomey, who won Specter's seat in 2010, Gov. Tom Corbett, Lt. Gov. Jim Cawley and state party chairman Rob Gleason all are publicly uncommitted. Former Govs. Tom Ridge and Mark Schweiker, four congressmen and GOP national committeeman Bob Asher, are backing Romney.

Even some who know Santorum well say he isn't the best candidate for the times.

"It's fairly clear Mitt Romney is a much better candidate than Rick Santorum to attract swing voters in a year like this," said former Rep. Phil English, a Romney supporter who campaigned with Santorum in 2006.

Tags:
Associated Press,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Come on Rick.....you can't let Romney beat you if we are to have a brokered convention. At first, I saw you as nothing more than a right-wing panderer and a first class jerk. Now, you have become useful by helping in the cause to deny Romney from reaching the magic number. The other idiot (Gingrich) was useful in the beginning but now should consider getting out of the race since he is no longer helping the cause. I'm starting to regret having said all of those truthful things about Santorum being a lover of BIG Government and the bastard stepchild of Mike "Huckleberry". Well, I take it all back! Rick Santorum is one of the greatest human beings ever to walk the face of the earth. I wouldn't be surprised if he can walk on water too! Now go out and vote for Rick like your life depended on it. We need Rick to close the door on Mitt Romney, and to open the door for Ron Paul to crush Mitt and his establishment backers at the convention in Tampa.

Did I mention that neither Rick Santorum nor Mitt Romney can beat Obama? I guess that leaves only Ron Paul who can. Be a team player and cast your protest vote against Mitt by voting for the remarkable Rick Santorum. Or, if you feel kind of stupid doing that, why don't you really make your vote count by voting for Ron Paul (the only candidate who can beat Obama). You will feel good about yourself, and you will be on the winning team!

Ron Paul 2012!!

Bob Vondruska of CA 12:40PM April 06, 2012

"He (Santorum) has complained, at times bitterly, about being badly outspent by Romney . . ."

The reason this line of attack fails is because, if the situation were reversed and Santorum had the financial clout and organization, he, too, would be doing the exact same thing Romney is doing.

Of all the candidates in the field, Romney came to the table prepared to run for president. He laid out a national organization, lined up the endorsements, found the money, got on the ballot in all the states, etc.

What exactly were Santorum or Gingrich doing for the past 4 years to prepare for this moment? Apparently nothing.

Conseqeuntly, hissy fits thrown by Santorum and Gingrich ring hollow. These candidates entered the race totally unprepared. They brought their B games when they needed to bring an A game. They didn't get on ballots, they touted they were operating on a shoe string budget out of the back of a car, etc.

The only reason they have lasted as long as they have is because of the superpacs. In fact, if I were a superpac I think the first question I would have asked is: "Why should I support you wheyn you've none nothing to prepare for the race?"

If Santorum knew he was running for president, presummably his entire life, then he only has himself to blame for his total failure to prepare for the race. And he somehow wants Americans to believe that he is prepared to be "President" when he can't even prepare for the nomination to run as candidate for president?

Unbelievable. He must think everyone is stupid, ignorant, or both.

david of ID 10:19AM April 06, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos