• Comment (1)

SPIN METER: GOP claims about Obama puzzle enviros

March 23, 2012 RSS Feed Print

By BETH FOUHY and DINA CAPPIELLO, Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) — Mitt Romney says President Barack Obama blocked construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline as a gift to environmentalists. Newt Gingrich calls Obama "President Algae" for supporting research on biofuels. And Rick Santorum says Obama's environmental views constitute a "phony theology" that prioritizes the earth over people.

The leading Republican presidential hopefuls have cast Obama as environmental extremist whose policies have put him out of touch with the needs of ordinary Americans. It's a characterization that may resonate with GOP primary voters, but it has surprised environmental activists, many of whom say they are let down by Obama's record on their issues.

"The environmental movement has been at odds with Barack Obama for much of his three years in the White House," said Bill McKibben, founder of the environmental group 350.org. "The president is very much in the center — far too much in the center for many environmentalists."

As a candidate, Obama's pledge to limit the gases that contribute to global warming and embrace cleaner forms of energy pleased many environmental activists. But nearing the end of his first term, Obama's record on the environment is mixed — and many of his decisions have irked the very activists who Republicans suggest have broad sway over administration policies.

"Absolutely, he has been a disappointment," said Frank O'Donnell, president of the environmental group Clean Air Watch. "When Obama was elected, I think public health and environmental advocates thought a number of unresolved problems would be dealt in short order. And we learned that environmental protection did not prove to be a first-tier activity for the White House."

Some Obama actions have cheered environmentalists. He successfully ushered in historic increases in fuel economy standards for automobiles as well as the first-ever regulations on heat-trapping gases blamed for global warming and on toxic mercury pollution from power plants. He has invested heavily in cleaner forms of energy; the U.S. produces more energy from alternative sources such as wind, solar and biofuels now than it has at any point in history.

But Obama failed to persuade a Democratic Congress to pass promised legislation limiting carbon emissions. He abandoned the legislative effort entirely after Republicans gained control of the House in the 2010 elections.

And in a move that deeply angered environmentalists, the president in September scrubbed a plan to set a stricter health standard on lung-damaging smog, sticking with one set by his GOP predecessor George W. Bush that scientists say is too weak.

For the GOP presidential candidates, it all amounts to a zealous pursuit of policies that have slowed the nation's economic recovery.

In his appeal to evangelical voters, Santorum has framed Obama's environmentalism as "phony theology" — a belief espoused by many Christian conservatives that environmental activism places nature above man and promotes veneration of the earth instead of God.

Recently, Santorum, Romney and Gingrich have cast the rising cost of gasoline, currently averaging about $3.88 a gallon, as a consequence of Obama's decisions to limit oil drilling in environmentally sensitive areas. However, U.S. oil production is unrelated to gasoline prices, given that oil is a global commodity, and factors that influence gasoline prices are generally beyond the control of a president or a nation.

In Louisiana on Wednesday, Santorum blamed Obama's "radical energy policy" for slowing oil production on federal lands and off the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

"The underlying reason is because he believes in man-made global warming," Santorum said of Obama. The former Pennsylvania senator has dismissed climate change as "political science" despite a broad consensus among climate scientists that human activity has contributed to a warming of the earth.

Gingrich has made the price of gasoline the central tenet of his sputtering candidacy, insisting he will bring gas prices down to $2.50 a gallon if elected.

"This is a very anti-fossil fuels administration. The left wing environmental movement hates oil," Gingrich said recently at a campaign stop in Alabama.

Romney has called on Obama to fire his "gas hike trio" — Romney's term for Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Environmental Protection Agency chief Lisa Jackson.

Tags:
Associated Press,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Courts will be a great line of defense for the environment, if given teeth. When someone in the local community is polluting.. then with sympathetic courts, the polluter has to pay damages To the one or ones harmed by the pollution. Clean air and clean water should be our First priority.

Even if a neighbor has a high emmisions car, he should have a penalty before those who have to breath the dirtied air. If a commercial polluter is in the commumity, it can go to court. The court doesn't close down anyone, they "make whole" the victims of the pollution. No one will pollute when it's cheaper to opt for cleaner energy and cleaner systems of industry.

In cities or towns where traffic is congested and the air unhealthy nearby the roads, those opting for hybrids or electric cars ought to be the only ones not targeted by local litigation of citizens. You can still drive a gas guzzler, but those it harms will be collecting something from you. Justice is done, And people will be Choosing for cleaner cars.

Courts are Designed to compensate those wronged by others, and clean air and clean water are worth the effort.

CO2 emmisions are a tougher issue. Essentially, no one Knows if they are harmful.. many scientists think they can lead to global warming. Plants grow lush with high CO2 content in the air.. so plant life on earth does well with the increased CO2.. yet, the global warming issue is troubling.

The science is more clear about floroclorocarbon (the air conditioning and aerosol spray pollutants which deplete the ozone layer) and it makes sense to ban them.

Odd that if global warming Is occuring and it Does lead to an ice age after a few centuries, that will be self correcting.. world population will decline and therefore CO2 increases in the atmosphere decline. Pollution just isn't the right Word for CO2 increase, because the air isn't "dirty" in any way from it. No one thinks that there will never be another ice age, but do we want to Hurry it's approach and ARE we hurrying it along? This discussion will go on for a long time.

John of NY 6:47AM March 23, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos