• Comment (8)

Romney charges Santorum compromised his principles

February 23, 2012 RSS Feed Print

By BETH FOUHY and KASIE HUNT, Associated Press

PHOENIX (AP) — Mitt Romney took new aim at Rick Santorum's image as a devoted conservative Thursday, accusing his rival of compromising his own principles by repeatedly voting for legislation he didn't believe in.

Romney noted that during Wednesday night's heated GOP debate the former senator said he had voted for President George W. Bush's No Child Left Behind education bill because "sometimes you take one for the team."

"I wonder which team he was taking it for?" Romney asked during a speech to an Association of Builders and Contractors meeting in Phoenix. "My team is the American people, not the insiders in Washington."

During the debate, Santorum was forced to defend several votes on issues such as a right-to-work measure that clashed with his conservative philosophy. He explained at length why he backed bills that included targeted spending called "earmarks," saying it was better to have Congress decide where to send the money than to let executive branch departments have complete authority.

"I don't know that I've ever seen a politician explain in so many ways why he voted against his principles," Romney said Thursday.

Romney and Santorum are powering into a crucial stretch of Republican primaries and caucuses over the next 13 days.

Later Thursday, Romney was turning his focus to tea partyers in Michigan, his birthplace, where cash-strapped Santorum is waging an unexpectedly strong challenge. Romney's been put on the defensive in the auto-building state over his opposition to the government's bailout of car makers.

Romney took a pounding on the auto issue in the debate, and President Barack Obama's re-election campaign piled on Thursday. Obama released a TV ad in Michigan accusing Romney and the other GOP candidates of turning their backs on an industry that supports more than 1 million workers in the state by opposing the bailout.

A tea party rally Thursday night in Milford, Mich., will give Romney another chance to explain why he opposed the rescue of GM and Chrysler amid the economic crisis but supported bailouts for banks.

Santorum, flourishing in the polls, trails in the money chase and is concentrating on beefing up his campaign treasury in hopes of an upset in Michigan's primary on Tuesday. That would cap a rebound that began two weeks ago when Santorum won caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado and a nonbinding primary in Missouri.

The 20th debate of the nomination race offered the GOP hopefuls their final face-to-face outing on a national stage before contests that may well winnow the four-man field.

The debate was staged in Arizona, which also votes Tuesday and where Romney is so confident of victory he hasn't aired any television ads.

After the Arizona and Michigan primaries come Washington's caucuses four days later. Then 10 states cast ballots on Super Tuesday, March 6.

Polls show Santorum leading the field nationally and in several states. Romney and rivals Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich used the televised debate to challenge Santorum, who repeatedly found himself in the hot seat over his record on spending, home-state projects known as earmarks and support for a federal education law.

Romney criticized Santorum for support of spending programs when he represented Pennsylvania in Congress, where he served both in the House and Senate. Romney said Santorum voted five times to raise the government's ability to borrow, supported retention of a law that favors construction unions and supported increased spending for Planned Parenthood. He said federal spending rose 78 percent overall while Santorum was in Congress.

Santorum retorted that government spending declined as a percentage of the economy when he was in the Senate, and he noted that when Romney was asked last year if he would support a pending debt-limit increase, "he said yes."

The former Massachusetts governor also went after Santorum on earmarks, the specialized spending bills directed to a particular state or program.

"You voted for the Bridge to Nowhere," Romney said to Santorum, referring to an infamous bridge proposal in Alaska that would have been built with millions in federal funds. "I would put a ban on earmarks."

Paul went further, calling Santorum a "fake" conservative. Gingrich dismissed the argument over earmarks as "silly" but said his years as House speaker made him best equipped to bring reform to such Washington practices.

Santorum, for his part, said he had differentiated between "good earmarks and bad earmarks" and supported only those that funded defense and other needed projects.

He also noted that Romney had sought earmarks to fund the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics. And he blamed Romney anew for championing a health care law in Massachusetts that became the prototype for Obama's health care law, which is detested by conservatives.

"It would be a difficult task for someone who had the model for Obamacare — the biggest issue in this race — to be the nominee of our party," Santorum said.

In rebuttal, Romney said Santorum actually bore responsibility for passage of the health care law that Obama won from a Democratic-controlled Congress in 2010, even though he wasn't in office at the time. Romney said that in a primary battle in 2004, Santorum had supported then-Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who later switched parties and voted for the law Obama wanted.

Santorum also took his lumps from the audience, which booed when he said he had voted for the No Child Left Behind education law even though he had opposed it.

"Look, politics is a team sport, folks," he said of the measure backed by Republican President George W. Bush and other GOP lawmakers.

Santorum's rise in the race has left Paul and Gingrich as outsiders looking for a way in.

Paul has yet to win any primaries or caucuses. He is airing an ad in Michigan, though, challenging Santorum's claim of taking a conservative line against federal spending.

Gingrich, the former Georgia congressman, is pinning his hopes for a comeback on that state on March 6. He was campaigning in Washington state on Thursday and Friday.

___

Fouhy reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Connie Cass in Washington also contributed to this report.

___

Follow Fouhy on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bfouhy

Follow Kasie Hunt: http://www.twitter.com/kasie

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Tags:
Associated Press,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

For a Mormon Bishop Mitt Romney is nothing but a bad liar. Rotten to the core.

Charlotte of NM 3:58PM April 07, 2012

You don't replace a Saul Alinsky radical (Obama) with a Gordon Gekko wannabe (Romney).

They should either take this to the convention, or be prepared for those of us who will leave the "president section" of their November ballots blank.

CaptainCliche of AZ 4:08PM April 05, 2012

Obama and Romney are almost exactly alike in Political Policy and agenda.. only their Party affiliation and their race separates them.

How does one defend forced mandated substandard inferior State Socialized Medicine that bankrupts the residents, citizens, and Independent businesses and companies in the Free Market Capitalist Free Enterprise system of a State, let alone the Nation, but then turns around and argues that he must repeal Obamacare, the very same thing he implemented and refuses to refute and repeal in his own State called Romneycare.. And the people actually buy this BS horse manure..

It's no wonder why Obama was elected in the first place. How easily the people are fooled.. They want to replace one radical progressive liberal, with a moderate progressive liberal.. Well, that makes sense.. No it doesn't..

Just because someone is deemed electable by the media and the GOP RINO establishment, does mean they are the best person to lead our Nation. Thus also why Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan have done a great disservice to the Tea Party Constitutional Reagan Conservatives, and Conservatism itself.

In other words, how and where do we get to a point that abandoning our Principles for political electable convenience, is best for the Nation..  It is NOT, and is why we stand by the US Constitution, and NOT by the politicians, as Freedom and Liberty are forever, not these fraudulent politically electable politicians.

Romney is no Ronald Reagan, and never will be, period.

Both Obama and Romney are the antithesis of President Ronald Reagan.

I, and millions of other true Tea Party Reagan Conservatives will never support, let alone vote for Romney, period, whether in the Primary, or the General election. Abandoning our values and principles for political electable convenience is not what I will do.

Sonny D. of AK 8:45PM March 31, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos