Democrats, Obama Go on the Attack

Fresh off a victory on healthcare, the party hopes to rebound in the polls

April 1, 2010 RSS Feed Print

The midterm elections this November are shaping up as the most acrimonious in years. One indication has been the rising level of threats and vandalism against members of Congress who supported the new healthcare law, which has stirred passions across the country.

The Democrats and the White House have been rejuvenated by enactment of the massive bill, which President Obama signed last week. This changed the political landscape, at least for the moment, by showing that the Democratic majority in Congress could get things done by working with the administration. The newly combative Democrats' goal between now and November, party strategists say, will be to attack Republicans not only for opposing the bill but for seeking to roll back key benefits in the new law. The theory is that it's unpopular to take away benefits once they are given, and the Democrats will portray the Republicans as cantankerous and stingy obstructionists who want to do just that.

White House counselor David Axelrod says the debate will now shift from seemingly endless bickering over congressional tactics. This was terrain on which Democrats were always at a disadvantage because the legislative process is so messy and often incomprehensible to outsiders. The White House and the Democrats will underscore what the law will do for everyday Americans. "As people become familiar with it, it will sell itself," Axelrod says.

Not that the measure's supporters are holding back. Tim Kaine, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, has been traveling the country arguing that the new law will make a number of popular changes immediately, such as giving seniors a discount on prescription drugs, providing tax breaks to small businesses, allowing parents to keep their children on their insurance policies until they turn 26, and forbidding insurance companies from denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions.

" 'Bring back pre-existing conditions' is one helluva bumper sticker," Kaine told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution during a fundraising trip to Georgia. ". . . I think all the Republican candidates should be asked, 'Do they want to be nonstop shills for the insurance industry rather than help people solve their healthcare needs?' " Kaine added: "All the boogeyman arguments the other guys created were fiction, and the American public will see that." The DNC is making these points in television and radio ads in more than two dozen key congressional districts.

Meanwhile, the GOP also is on the offensive, branding the new law as a vast and costly federal intrusion into healthcare. GOP strategists say that there are plenty of elements voters oppose and that Republicans will use these to attack Democratic incumbents who voted for the plan. Among the unpopular provisions: requiring most Americans to have a minimum level of health insurance or pay a fine. Sixty-two percent of voters say they are less likely to support a legislator who backed that provision than one who did not, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey.

On a separate track, a number of state attorneys general, led by Republicans, pledge to file lawsuits to have the law declared unconstitutional. They argue that key provisions are the province of the states, not Washington, and are zero­ing in on the requirement that every American who can afford it must take out health insurance.

Some polls indicate that there has been a slight upswing in public support for the measure since its passage drew such massive publicity. Gallup, for example, found that 49 percent of Americans thought passage was "a good thing," while 40 percent thought it was "a bad thing" and 11 percent didn't know. This is a reversal from the findings of most polls before the bill was approved, when a plurality opposed the plan. The poll also found that 15 percent said they were enthusiastic about the bill's passage, 35 percent were pleased, 23 percent disappointed, and 19 percent angry. "Passage of healthcare reform was a clear political victory for President Obama and his allies in Congress," a spokesman for Gallup says. "While it also pleases most of his Democratic base nationwide, it is met with greater ambivalence among independents and with considerable antipathy among Republicans."

Clearly, the country remains deeply split about overhauling healthcare, and selling the final product won't be easy.

Tags:
Obama administration,
democratic party,
Barack Obama,
The Presidency

Reader Comments Read all comments (61)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ."

Really? How come my comments have disappeared? Drivel is not a swear word.

Austerlitz was another one of Napoleon's battles. I'm just clarifying in case you are mistaking it for Auschwitz and thought I was making some sort of Nazi reference.

I'm just trying to figure out why my comments keep disappearing. They were no more partisan or insulting than several others that are still up.

roQQboTTom of TX 6:45PM April 11, 2010

The Democrats use to be for the people, there is a solution:term limits!

President-6years 1term

Congress-5years 1term

Senate-5years 1term

The morons would get the people's work done then, they wouldn't have to worry about reelection!

Randall Ivey of NC 5:40AM April 10, 2010

Any one who believes that this health care bill is a good thing is either stupid, self interested, or just plain ignorant. Just think back to anytime that you had to deal with the federal government for anything. If you called them, you probably ended up on hold for a long wait, then your call gets dropped, it is always preceded by some prerecorded and lengthy legal disclaimer. When you think you got to the right person, you're told to contact someone else, and the hand off loop goes on and on. If you ever get an answer to your inquiry, the next person you talk to will give you a different answer.Well this is just a simple example that anyone can check out to verify.This administration is out of touch with what the people have demanded, but being the elitist that they are , they think we're all ignorant and they know what's best for you no matter what the cost, or what you think or want them to do on your behalf. Now think of the layer upon layer of these types of people ( many of whom barely speak English properly) swho will be added to one of the largest most inefficient organizations in the country, and will now be empowered to cut you off at the ankles.To make matters worse, you will pay their salaries. If you think that all the goodies promised are coming your way think again. I asked to get my kids on my insurance, just to take advantage of the candy they are tossing out and guess what, military members or vets on tricare insurance don' t qualify. Well if we can't get the benefit, than who else should? Besides, that provision be there anyway.From age 21 on, they're no kids, they're adolescents. It's smoke and mirrors mandated by the government that doesn't even know what is in the bill because it's so large , complicated and filled with "there will be a committee formed to decide...." Go Figure!

Dave of FL 11:49AM April 06, 2010

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video