Obama Caught Up in the Washington Blame Game

The rancorous atmosphere in Washington has spread to healthcare town hall meetings

August 27, 2009 RSS Feed Print

No matter how much politicians say they want to get along, a dominant feature of the political landscape in Washington is still the blame game. And it will intensify next month when congressional Democrats and Republicans return from their summer break to do battle on healthcare, the economy, climate change, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The rancorous atmosphere is already spreading. Throughout August, all sides have been trying to point the finger at their opponents for the recession, the federal deficit, and the seemingly endless obstacles on Capitol Hill to healthcare legislation, which is President Obama's top domestic priority.

[See photos of anger at town hall meetings.]

Everyone seems to feel aggrieved, generating a toxic brew of distrust. Even the normally dispassionate Obama turned personal in a speech in Grand Junction, Colo., . "I just lost my grandmother last year," the president said. "I know what it's like to watch somebody you love, who's aging, deteriorate and have to struggle with that." (Obama's 86-year-old grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, died after a long illness on November 2, two days before he won the presidential election.) Obama disputed the idea spread by opponents "that somehow I ran for public office or members of Congress are in this so they can go around pulling the plug on Grandma. When you start making arguments like that, that's simply dishonest—especially when I hear the argument coming from members of Congress in the other party who, turns out, sponsored similar provisions." 

Deepening Obama's problem are increasing anger and frustration among his party's liberals over signals from the administration that it may not be as solidly committed to a public insurance option as the left had thought. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters last week that a government-run healthcare option would "keep insurance companies honest and increase competition." And leaders of the 83-member Congressional Progressive Caucus sent a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius arguing that "to take the public option off the table would be a grave error." Some liberals are threatening to withhold support for any health insurance bill that doesn't include that option. 

On the other side, Republicans are upset that Obama keeps blaming his predecessor, George W. Bush, for the nation's woes. Obama says that when he took over in January, the economy was already in the ditch. But a key GOP strategist says perceptions are changing. The strategist, who advises many congressional Republicans, says Obama's job approval has declined recently because Americans, more and more, believe that the nation's major problems, from the recession and unemployment to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, can no longer be blamed on Bush. "Obama is increasingly being held accountable," says the strategist. 

Attempting to exploit that trend, Republican leaders have been blasting Obama and Democrats in Congress for making things worse. Most pointedly, they accuse them of running the economy deeper into a hole with vast spending programs, initiating a stimulus package that hasn't ended the recession and hasn't lowered the unemployment rate, and creating trillions of dollars in new debt.

In a recent memo to Republican activists, House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio urged party members to adopt "a culture of entrepreneurial insurgency" to spread doubts about Obama on the healthcare overhaul, the economy, and other issues. The Republican National Committee jumped into the fray with its own advertising campaign making similar points.

Some argue that the partisans on both sides are off base. Americans favor a middle ground, says Rutgers political scientist Ross Baker. The way to succeed in revamping healthcare is "incremental," Baker says. "There won't be a total restructuring of healthcare. Things don't happen that way."

There is a real danger here for the Washington establishment. If voters conclude that it's business as usual—gridlock, created for partisan purposes, and a refusal or inability to do the public's business—they will turn against those in office. That could cause the defeat of significant numbers of incumbents in the midterm elections next year, fuel the rise of a third party or an independent candidate for president, and add to the cynicism about Washington's ability to get things done.

In sum, playing the blame game is playing with fire.

Tags:
The Presidency,
healthcare,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (32)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Thats a lie i don't blame Obama for the recession. i do blame Bush, for stealing the presidentcy foe eight years. both Busch i mean Bush and Mccain said that the country was sound[that means that the country is doing fine]which was a lie.this happened before Obama got in.and look at how the republicans are acting now.shear hatred on top of evil.now i see why we are in so many wars. all of these stall tactic are to make sure Obama fails.just like they said. If the REPUBLICANS shut up and sit down and stop standing in the way of progress . Things can get done.but they are standing in the way.and don't want to see progress.they want to see failure from this president.and a lot of the media are with the republicans works. What kind of place is this???[HELL]seems like it to me.Also Bush is getting away with murder of mass distruction.thats right take our minds off this to republicans.they also put Palin in there, than all the banks got ripped off.I guess Obama did that too.

Victoria Tilghman of PA 7:45PM September 22, 2009

With a racist socialist in the White House, liberal media taking every chance to demonize anyone who doesn't agree with their god in the White House, unemployment steadily increasing, high taxes and full government take-over in the horizon and now the Swine Flu apademic there just seems to be nothing bad news. Thank you leftist liberal morons. The only thing you had nothing to do with was the swine flue, but by one single action of voting, you have helped take the US down to the bottom of the barrel. And if that isn't bad enough, when someone speaks against your false god, you play the race card. Anyone with 1/2 a brain knows that your Obama has a Christmas card list of racists who he calls friends and those same friends also would love to see the US fail because of their terrorist ties. Next election, do America a favor and STAY HOME.

Angry American of VA 7:26AM September 16, 2009

The main question for you is, is a reform necessary. Looking from outside, I would say yes.

Why, because you should have the same problems as we do: aging people and increasing costs. So we are changing our system to adapt and I believe you have to change it too. I think a universal system is better, maybe not for everyone, but for the country as a whole.

We have a universal healthcare (Germany) that covers the minimum healthcare for everyone. If you want to have expensive, fancy treatments it is also possible but you have to pay out of your own pocket, or have an additional private insurance. To me that seems the right way.

As a sidenote: "Universal health care is implemented in all industrialized countries, with the exception of the United States." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_health_care#cite_note-1

This suggests that a universal healthcare system is better. Or that everyone elso is doing it wrong.

DB 8:07AM September 13, 2009

advertisement

Latest Video