Obama Takes Aim at Credit Card Companies

The White House supports legislation to crack down on credit card rates, fees, and practices

April 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print

As part of a larger push on consumer finance issues and under mounting pressure from cash-strapped Americans, President Obama called in executives from 13 credit card companies to deliver a stern message: Crack down on the kinds of practices that the Federal Reserve has called "unfair" and "deceptive."

"People are finding themselves starting off with a low rate, and the next thing that you know, their interest rate has doubled," Obama said after today's meeting. "There have to be strong and reliable protections for consumers."

Credit card companies are coming under growing fire for engaging in practices like "universal default," in which consumers who are late in payments to one creditor find their interest rates raised by another. Critics also cite "two-cycle billing," which occurs when consumers who pay the full balance of their card one month but not the next find interest being charged on both months of debt. Government officials and lawmakers complain that actions taken by credit card companies are not transparent enough or announced with enough advance warning.

The House Financial Services Committee yesterday approved a bill sponsored by Democratic Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York to ban the most egregious practices. It would impose limits on fees, prohibit companies from charging customers for paying over the phone or the Internet, and require that companies notify cardholders of increased rates at least 45 days in advance. Some of those changes have already been approved by the Federal Reserve, which changed its regulations in December, but the bill both goes further and, lawmakers say, is necessary to codify the regulations into law.

Obama said today that he supports legislation to crack down on the practices. He also unveiled a number of principles he wants to see reflected in the bill, including that all credit card company forms and statements "have to be written in plain language and be in plain sight—no more fine print" and that each firm offer at least one "plain vanilla, easy-to-understand" card as a basic default for consumers.

During his campaign, Obama proposed a "credit card bill of rights" to clean up many of the industry's activities. At least publicly, though, the issue has—unsurprisingly—taken a back seat to other economic efforts, like bailing out banks and auto companies. Although some of the credit card companies have received more than $120 billion in bailout funds, officials are emphasizing that the practices need to be addressed whether the banks are propped up by the government or not.

The House bill would go into effect either a year after enactment or on July 1, 2010, whichever comes first, although one provision—the requirement to give 45 days' notice of changes—will be enforceable 90 days after the bill is signed. The Federal Reserve regulations take effect July 1, 2010.

Tags:
credit cards,
credit,
Obama administration,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (27)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I have just expecienced my limit being reduced with Bank of America. I had a $22,000 credit limit. Over 2 years time I have put $11,500 on my card due to income difficulties (I'm sorry I have to buy my dog's medicine even when I can't afford it). They said I can't use my card to "supplement my income" and because of a foreclosure 2 years ago they lowered my limit to $300 over what I have already spent and told me AFTERWARDS. I understand the foreclosure would cause me problems (even though it was because my husband left me) but for goodness sakes look at my perfect payment record before and after that. What happened to your credit number being important. Mine is still over 700 and they don't care. I found it very ironic when I called to question the letter I'd received he answered with "thank you for making ontime payments since 2003." Guess it doesn't really matter.

Angela of MO 9:33PM June 17, 2010

I have been with WAMU since 2005 and am now with Chase since they took over. I have always been in good standing with both banks (actually with all financial institutions that I have dealt with). Due to my unemployment and my son's funeral, I started charging to my credit cards. When one of my credit card's promotional 0% interest offer was over and was starting to charge me 10% interest, I still owed a bit over $2000.00 on it. So I used one of Chase's promotional offers for 0% interest for 10 months. There was to be a one-time transfer charge for the transaction. However, they were charging not only that, but also convenience check charges every month as well as promotional summary charges (twice). When I called Chase I was told that the check I had used was for 14.24% interest. Now why would I or anyone on this planet transfer depth from a 10% interest card to a 14.24% interest card? That would be the stupidest thing to do. Obviously, Chase lured me, as their customer, into believing that if I use one of those 0% interest checks to transfer depths from another credit card company over to them, I will get a 0% interest rate for 10 months. Is there anything we, the consumers, can do? Do we have any rights at all? I still have some of the promotional letters they had sent me later in my possession, but the one of which I had used the convenience check is gone. What can I do? I feel depressed and tricked, like I fell victim to a scam artist. I never thought something like this could ever happen.

Simone of TX 5:39PM December 14, 2009

Credit Card offers at CreditCard-Terminal.com.

Search credit cards and reviews about the best low interest rates.

compare rates

http://creditcard-terminal.com

find the lowest rates through http://creditcard-terminal.com

c

RedDwedeOpeda of AL 7:09PM November 02, 2009

Photo Galleries

Wildfires

Erratic wildfires move through the western states.

advertisement

Latest Video