Congress Sends Obama a Bill to Boost Community Service

The House passed legislation that will dramatically increase the size of AmeriCorps

April 8, 2009 RSS Feed Print
Volunteers with YouthBuild Americorps build a house on the National Mall in Washington.

Volunteers with YouthBuild Americorps build a house on the National Mall in Washington.

There may not be much agreement in Congress about President Obama's plans for the budget, Detroit's struggling car companies, or, well, much of the rest of the economy. But last week, a bipartisan group of lawmakers found common ground on at least one issue close to Obama's heart: the importance of community service.

In one of the most sweeping overhauls of the country's national service programs since the 1960s, the House passed a bill that will dramatically increase the size and scope of AmeriCorps, the government's largest volunteer organization and the domestic equivalent of the Peace Corps. The $5.7 billion legislation, called the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act after one of its primary sponsors, will triple the size of the service program, originally proposed by President John F. Kennedy. It will increase the number of federally subsidized opportunities for volunteering each year from 75,000 to 250,000, while also expanding the program's mission by creating several new "service corps" devoted to clean energy and health care.

For Obama, whose early work as a community organizer inspired him to make national service "a cause of my presidency," as he put it during the campaign, the bill's passage offers a rare moment to celebrate after a difficult first few months in office. "This is legislation that will usher in a new era of service in America," Obama, who may sign the bill as early as this week, said after the House approved the legislation. "I call on all Americans to stand up and do what they can to serve their communities, shape our history, and enrich both their own lives and the lives of others across this country."

The bill's passage was accompanied by some grumbling from conservatives, including Sen. Jim DeMint, a Republican from South Carolina who denounced it as an example of "the federal government reaching further into the world of civil society." But for the most part, the effort to boost volunteerism brought a temporary truce to Capitol Hill. After the Senate approved the bill 78 to 20 last month, Sen. Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican who cosponsored the legislation, crossed the aisle to embrace Ted Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat for whom the bill was named. "Volunteer service is a keystone of our country's traditions, and it is becoming increasingly important in these troubled economic times that we help our neighbors," Hatch said.

In spite of the soaring rhetoric, lawmakers aren't asking Americans to serve for nothing. Would-be volunteers interested in programs ranging from tutoring disadvantaged kids to building affordable housing will also be offered an array of new educational incentives. Those include an increase in the college stipend to $5,350 for a year of service and a $1,000 education award for older participants who volunteer for at least 350 hours, which can be passed on to their children or grandchildren.

Many of the bill's supporters, of course, are still trying to appeal to a higher calling. "History has shown that in times of crisis, Americans turn to service and volunteering for healing, for rebuilding, and for hope," said George Miller, a Democratic congressman from California. "This legislation is just what we need, at this pivotal moment, to get our nation back on track."

With the country facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, that may be easier said than done.

Tags:
community,
House of Representatives,
Obama administration,
Barack Obama,
Congress

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Dear Editor,

Community service is unpaid work which benefits a community, but something has gone amuck with our nation’s volunteerism. There has been a lack of people who want to volunteer, so our nation got concerned and decided to set in. Their solution to the problem was rewarding those who do volunteer with things such as scholarships and cash awards. When the number of people volunteering only increased slightly the word volunteer was taken out of the picture and graduation requirement took its place. Community service is meant to be a way of helping because it was thought to be the right thing to do, a way of getting satisfaction for making something better, or just a random act of kindness. This thought process has been turned into “what do I get out of it?” thinking.

President Obama passed the Edward M. Kennedy Serve American Act early this April. “It will increase the number of federally subsidized opportunities for volunteering each year from 75,000 to 250,000, while also expanding the program's mission by creating several new "service corps" devoted to clean energy and health care.” The problem isn’t the lack of organizations; it’s the lack of motivation. There are several organizations that are trying to help better people’s lives and they just aren’t known. An example is Habitat for Humanity, people get together and build a home for those who might not have one or are in danger of loosing it. The issue is the lack of knowledge of how one can help their community, or people elsewhere, not the lack of organizations. An organization that is in need of assistance isn’t too difficult to find. By adding more organizations it puts a harsher strain on the currently existing ones.

The idea of doing something to get something in return is beginning to take over and the government is aiding it. Volunteering your time, hands and/or mind should be a selfless act and there shouldn’t be a reward or money given out, if that were the case would that not be called work? What is the difference between working for a pay check and working to get a grant of money? There are grants, and rewards for those people who meet certain requirement and work a certain number of hours, mostly 350 hours. You could work at a job for 350 hours and get the same amount of money that you would volunteering. The government is giving those who volunteer for these organizations; why not just give the money straight to the organization, the people who need it most.

Schools are beginning to require their students to volunteer for a certain number of hours in order to graduate. This is a restriction, these students aren’t helping because they want to it is because they have to. By being forced to volunteer brings the idea of it being a chore and not doing something because it is for the good of their community. This thinking process is going to discourage children from volunteering their help in the future. When searching for the definition of “community service” most dictionaries will give 2 possible definitions, one of which is “Similar work preformed by law offend to serve a sentence in lieu of or in addition to jail time.” These children are not convicted criminals so why are they being treated like ones?

The second and most popular definition of “community service” is “unpaid work which benefits the community”. This isn’t happening anymore. Community service is just another chore that people don’t want to do anymore, it is not the lack of organizations. Community service needs its own help.

Kayla of CA 1:38PM October 28, 2009

cEwnFE

Tmcdeeui of OK 1:22AM July 14, 2009

The House version that passed, but isn't in the final version approved by the senate also. I'm sure they'll add amendments later. READ THE FINE PRINT PEOPLE

SEC. 125. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES AND INELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.

`(a) Prohibited Activities- A participant in an approved national service position under this subtitle may not engage in the following activities:

`(1) Attempting to influence legislation.

`(2) Organizing or engaging in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes.

`(3) Assisting, promoting, or deterring union organizing.

`(4) Impairing existing contracts for services or collective bargaining agreements.

`(5) Engaging in partisan political activities, or other activities designed to influence the outcome of an election to any public office.

`(6) Participating in, or endorsing, events or activities that are likely to include advocacy for or against political parties, political platforms, political candidates, proposed legislation, or elected officials.

`(7) Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of religious proselytization.

Jodi of OH 9:54PM April 09, 2009

advertisement

Latest Video