Obama's Dilemma Over Terrorism Detainees

The new president finds it's not easy to change how America handles terrorism suspects

March 25, 2009 RSS Feed Print

One of the central themes of Barack Obama's campaign for president was outrage over alleged Bush administration abuses in the fight against terrorism. But as president, Obama is finding himself in the awkward position of quietly endorsing some of his predecessor's legal arguments when it comes to detainees and their treatment.

To be sure, Obama has changed the tone, banning controversial interrogation techniques, pledging to close the Guantánamo Bay detention center, and banishing the phrase "war on terrorism." Last week, he halted use of the term "enemy combatants" to describe those held at Guantánamo Bay. But navigating the legal issues surrounding detainees is proving to be a political high-wire act. On one side are Republicans like former Vice President Dick Cheney, who went on television to say that Obama's terrorism policies are making America more vulnerable. At the same time, Obama is taking flak from the left for a decision to have his Justice Department continue the Bush policy of trying to shield from prosecution government officials involved in detainee treatment.

Making matters more awkward is the leak of a long-secret report by the Red Cross, which provides the latest assertion that some suspected terrorist detainees were tortured by U.S. personnel while in captivity. The report concluded that what the Bush administration dubbed "enhanced interrogation techniques," including waterboarding, "constituted torture," while other practices "constituted cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment."

The Justice Department's controversial legal opinions revolve around a series of lawsuits brought by former U.S. detainees over their treatment while in U.S. custody. Under Obama, the U.S. government is continuing to argue—as it did during the Bush years—that U.S. officials acting in good faith in the past should not be held legally liable for their actions. In response to a lawsuit by four former Guantánamo Bay detainees, Justice Department lawyers asserted this month that prosecuting military or government officials could cause them to make future decisions based on the fear of litigation rather than appropriate policy.

The Obama administration's stance has disappointed some of the president's supporters, along with human-rights advocates. "The Bush administration used circumlocution to avoid what can no longer be ignored," says Eric Lewis, a lawyer representing the four men. "Quite clearly, waterboarding is torture, and now the Red Cross report shows that other techniques, used in combination, are also torture."

Inquiries into past detainee practices could still be pursued in Congress, where several members are pushing for a so-called truth commission on Bush's counterterrorism activities. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has opened a yearlong probe of its own to examine CIA interrogations.

If the United States is unwilling to pursue the issue, others appear eager. This week, when former President Bush flew to Canada to deliver a speech, a group of Canadians urged their government to arrest Bush for ordering torture. The effort failed.

Tags:
Guantánamo Bay,
American Red Cross,
Department of Justice,
Obama administration,
Bush administration,
national security terrorism and the military,
terrorism,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If the media would give a complete honest factual accounting of the character and actions of many (not all) of those confined at GITMO, the rest of America as well as the world would know what the young members of military who supervise these detainees know: Most of them are killers who make Hannibal Lechter a appear a debutant. They want to kill or rape and kill ALL Americans, not be cause they are republicans, or support George Bush, but just because they are Americans. They jump at EVERY opportunity to assault the guards, physically, verbally or by spitting, throwing urine, feces or whatever. It is a sobering experience that has nothing to do with the treatment they received while in custody. They are ruthless killers with the only goal of destroying Americans and then the rest of any culture that does not complete fit their ideas, if such a culture can exist. The young servicemembers who make up the security staff at GITMO are the real victims of abuse and must be honored and commended for what they endure day in and day out.

J. Songin of NY 6:35PM March 26, 2009

These terrorists were caught in the battlefield trying to kill American soldiers and responsible for killing a CIA agent. Now detained without trial. Option #1 - ship them to a U.S. Ally with a mutual aid military treaty and leave them to rot in jail there, and Option #2 - those terrorists who claim innocence may volunteer for truth serum, with iris scan, voice stress analysis and conventional lie detector. If they pass all the tests, they may be set free. Now, setting all these hateful detainees free without conditions - or even setting them free to be "reconditioned" is a joke. Don't you think after years of jail, they'd be even more hateful and want to kill more Americans? Many who have been released have rejoined al Queda or other jihadist groups or are providing such groups with various types of support. Now why would we want to release these violent anarchists? And why should we? In the olden days of warfare, it would have been conventional to line them all up and shoot them... and the innocents would be collateral.

Tony Lee of CA 3:58PM March 26, 2009

Just "Take No Prisoners"

RA of WA of WA 2:23PM March 26, 2009

advertisement

Latest Video