DeMint, McCain Oppose 'Cash for Clunkers' Push

The Obama administration is hoping the Senate approves more funding for the program

August 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print

With the federal "cash for clunkers" program running out of gas, the Senate is expected to vote this week on a $2 billion boost that could prevent the government from pulling the plug on the popular program as early as tomorrow.

The program, which gives consumers up to $4,500 in credit for trading in their old cars for more fuel-efficient ones, has already exhausted its current $1 billion funding and needs Senate approval to continue, Transportation Secretary Ray Lahood said in a recent C-Span interview.

"We're going to work very hard with the Senate on this," LaHood said. "Our commitment is to make sure that car buyers and dealers are reimbursed."

Last Friday, the House approved in a 316-to-109 vote the additional $2 billion in funding, and the Senate is expected to vote on the bill before it goes on its August recess.

But some Republican senators plan to block the Senate from extending the program this week.

"This is crazy to try to rush this thing through again while they're trying to rush through healthcare," said Sen. Jim DeMint, a South Carolina Republican. "We've got to slow this thing down."

DeMint says he opposes the program because it's "helping auto dealers while there are thousands of other small businesses that aren't getting help."

Among the program's dissenters is Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, who is expected to lead a filibuster against the bill to give the program more money. McCain's spokeswoman said last week that the senator opposed the program from the start because of the cost to taxpayers.

Monthly auto sales reports expected to be released today will show how effective the program has been in fueling the auto industry. Ford said sales jumped 2.3 percent in July, its first monthly increase since November 2007.

Tags:
Senate

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Destroying useful vehicles is sinful. Some of the clunkers are all a lot people can afford. And encouraging people to purchase new cars at the behest of the UAW and incur debt in a time of uncertainty is ridiculous. What happens if the purchaser loses his or her job, then is the government make their payment?

Jane Rowland of AZ 3:54PM August 04, 2009

The Government could have regulated it to Chrysler, Ford and G.M. Why are we allowing the monies to go to Foreign Sales? We should be helping the USA !! I traded in a Ford that was getting 14 mpg for a GM that gets 22 to 29 mpg.....

Mike A. of FL 12:28PM August 04, 2009

trade your 18 mpg suv for 20 mpg suv get $3500

trade a 20mpg for a 30 mpg get $ 000000000 Z E R O

Jim of NY 1:54AM August 04, 2009

advertisement

Latest Video