America's New Energy Dependency: China's Metals

A clean-energy economy needs rare-earth metals to succeed. China has a near monopoly

July 1, 2009 RSS Feed Print

In 2007, a standoff unfolded between China and several American companies, including W.R. Grace, a major supplier of oil refining products. China was threatening to withhold supplies that keep refiners in business.

A worried State Department intervened. By then, W.R. Grace had only a three-month supply of the special metals it needs for its refining products. Because the metals come almost exclusively from China, if the government had not acted, sources say, oil refineries could have been forced to shut down, possibly triggering shortages across the country.

The metals W.R. Grace needed belong to a group known as "rare earths." They are the backbone of the Information Age and, potentially, the clean energy future. They are in iPods, Blackberrys, and plasma TVs. They are powerful and compact; they are exceedingly efficient. In many cases, there are no substitutes. On the periodic table, they have their own section, 17 metals in all, reflecting their unique atomic structure.

Fifty years ago, the world's economy was built on steel, aluminum, and iron. Today, rare-earth metals are reshaping it. But they are not easy to acquire, not anymore. In the 1970s and 1980s, the United States was the world's leading producer. Today, China provides nearly 97 percent of the world's supply. It has a near monopoly, and it is cutting exports.

Dominance. The strategic implications of this growing imbalance are vast, particularly for defense and energy. Wind turbines and electric cars have become clean energy symbols, but they are merely final products, the visible results of a supply chain that spans international borders and, for the most part, is largely overlooked by policymakers. At the bottom of this chain, at its most basic level, are rare-earth metals mined from the Earth's crust and made into magnets or other parts, then put into motors or batteries.

China's dominance in this arena, and its displacement of American leadership, are not accidental. In 1992, Deng Xiaoping, then the country's most powerful politician, outlined a plan. "The Middle East has oil; we have rare earths," he said. "We must develop these rare earths." Today this phrase is emblazoned, like a campaign slogan, across the roof of at least one Chinese factory.

Deng's call to arms has been carried out nearly flawlessly. China dominates the world market and in recent months has taken control of mines in Brazil and Australia, thereby eliminating potential competitors. It is poised to do with rare earths what the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries has done with oil: make the world dependent. In 2002, China exported about 60,000 tons of rare-earth metals. In 2008, it exported about 45,000 tons. In 2009, based upon preliminary estimates, that will drop into the 30,000s.

The slide will most likely continue, with potentially serious implications for President Obama's energy goals. In 2008, an Australian analyst named Dudley Kingsnorth released a report in which he calculated that China's rare-earth supplies could become off limits to the world as early as 2012. The severity of Kingsnorth's projection has been questioned by some, and the global recession has probably pushed the date back a few years. But the general trend holds. Resource production is limited, and China's internal demand is soaring, fueled by consumers and new energy ambitions. Within five years, China wants to be the world's leading manufacturer of wind turbines and electric batteries.

Global demand for rare-earth metals, meanwhile, is expected to grow at least 10 percent annually. If no new mines open, the scenarios are daunting. At best, if China continues exporting, global prices seem sure to rise. At worst, the West could be shut off altogether, left scrambling to find new sources of these metals for turbines, batteries, and other parts. "The very basic question is 'Are we going to trade dependence on Mideast oil for Chinese rare earths?' " says Jeff Green, a lobbyist who specializes in metals. "I think the answer is 'Probably.' "

Tags:
China

Reader Comments Read all comments (24)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Wr Grace tried to lease some of this property many years ago when the produced the rare earth metals. This area, Rhone Polnic a French company was going to recovery the rare earth metals. This area has had extensive drilling and many reports on the heavy mineral suit and gold that is in this 30 mile by 40 mile deposit. I would think that a deposit of this size would be one of the largest in the world., and would worry China very much. The technology is already known how to produce the rare earth metals from this deposit. Most of the area contains enough gold to pay for mining and milling and show a profit.

Orvie Zimmerman of CO 11:29PM July 17, 2009

We recently did a study on the world distribution of Rare Earths deposits and found that Australia has substantial quantities of mine grade rare earth deposits.

In fact Australian listed ASX companies control almost as much rare earths as China...

There are three Australian compnaies that have large Australian deposits and one very small by market cap company ASX:Code: GGG that owns the very large Greenland deposit (that may not be able to be mined due to political concerns)

To get an understanding of these issues please vist: http://www.australianrareearths.com/current-issues.html

<img src=http://www.australianrareearths.com/images/rees-update1.gif> if the image doesn't show cut and past this http://www.australianrareearths.com/images/rees-update1.gif

Sparty 10:31PM July 08, 2009

I have seen some other articles on this topic lately. I find it to be of concern, but I also think it may be a bit of a "tempest in a teapot". Economic and political forces may make it impossible for China to cut off supplies of critical materials to the rest of the world. Even if the costs of some of these materials increase 10X, many users may be largely indifferent because they use only small amounts.

There are a number of steps that can be taken to ameliorate the situation:

1) Stockpile - Western governments (including Japan) can stockpile years' of strategic supplies of these materials as a hedge against China shutting them off. This makes at least as much sense as a strategic petroleum reserve.

2) Exploration and mining: the fact that it currently takes 8-12 years to open a mine doesn't mean that the process can't be expedited

3) RECYCLING: One big difference between rare earth metals and oil/coal/natural gas is that we don't burn metals up. Not much discussed, but possible shortages might be another rationale for developed countries to STOP shipping their electronic junk to 3rd world hell-holes and work on processes to recover more of the metals here at home - for the US better for the global environment and American jobs.

4) Alternatives: with some time, creativity and ENERGY, substitutes can be found for most anything. It just may be that the results will be bulkier, heavier, less efficient, etc.

Let's think of how to solve the problem, not just wring our collective hands.

Rare Metal Man 1:04AM July 08, 2009

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video