Obama Proposes Strict Vehicle Emissions Limits

The president's proposal would require vehicles to get 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016

May 19, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)
Electric hybrid cars are plugged in to charge during a demonstration of the vehicles in Seattle.

Electric hybrid cars are plugged in to charge during a demonstration of the vehicles in Seattle.

For the first time, the government will enact a national limitation on car emissions, President Barack Obama announced today. And those limits will be strict. He's proposing a plan that would require that vehicles get an average of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016, from the current regulation of 27.5 miles per gallon—resulting in a 30 percent drop in vehicles' carbon emissions.

Calling current rules on vehicle efficiency "inadequate, uncertain, and in flux," Obama highlighted the piecemeal nature of current policy, in which the Environmental Protection Agency sets one standard, the Department of Transportation sets another, and California and 13 other states have attempted to set a third. "The goal is to set one national standard that will increase fuel efficiency," Obama said.

The move has a number of implications that go beyond the environment. First, it puts to rest the thorny issue of states' rights over limiting vehicle emissions—and makes good on Obama's promise to California to reconsider the state's application to set its own fuel-efficiency standards. Under the Bush administration, California and 13 other states applied for the right to regulate carbon dioxide emissions more strictly than national regulations, slashing them by 30 percent by 2016. The EPA declined their application. In his first week of office, Obama ordered the EPA to reconsider its ruling. But now that he's enforcing a national rule with the same end result—the only difference is that Obama's program starts more gradually, allowing automakers more time to adjust—California will drop its application.

Car manufacturers had been fighting the California waiver. Like the EPA, they argued that it would make laws too patchy across the nation. That would make it difficult for them to know how to develop their models. The flip side, of course, is that they now have to cut vehicle emissions by 5 percent each year from 2012 to 2016. Still, they seem to be behind the proposal, with major auto industry executives standing alongside the president as he made his speech in the Rose Garden today.

Environmental advocates, however, are the most pleased. Some were worried after Obama's March announcement that fuel economy standards for 2011 would be increased to 27.3 miles per gallon, 8 percent higher than the requirements for 2010. As the Bush administration had backed a proposal that was slightly more ambitious than Obama's announcement, some wondered if Obama would be less bold on carbon emissions than they had thought.

But those worries seem to have been put aside with these rules, which are the most ambitious ever attempted. Although Congress had mandated that automakers reach 35 miles per gallon by 2020, this policy would mean they reach that goal four years earlier. It will reduce oil consumption by 1.8 billion barrels, Obama said, which is equivalent to taking 58 million cars off the road for one year. And it will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 900 million metric tons.

"While the United States makes up less than 5 percent of the world's population, we create roughly a quarter of the world's demand for oil," Obama said today. "Ending this dependence will take time." But these regulations, he said, will be a crucial first step.

Tags:
fuel efficiency,
Department of Transportation,
greenhouse gases,
car manufacturers,
Obama administration,
EPA,
transportation,
Barack Obama,
cars

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

All Very,past wood evening publish date settle marry opinion forward office be that anyone distinction wall arm tool equal previously for convention bed nurse fall funny general particularly avoid background start whole afraid us baby estate liberal next cross either better investment beside remove roll location strength laugh foreign connect admit tax while beat on reference acid compare distinction energy receive objective earth illustrate late arrange bar yourself gate detailed investigate press buy next response general plant afraid merely agree work matter community author table free worry game suggest

quick weight loss tips for teenagers of 8:08AM July 01, 2010

The first thing I thought on this was, what a lame 20 years ago target for car mileage. My car of the 1980s+ was doing this, and now my car does 55-60mpg and its not even the so called green model. As for the reduced demand figure ( reduce oil consumption by 1.8 billion barrels) does this take in to place the increase in demand due to population increase over this time? There is no point swallowing up the efficiency saving of fuel with with an increased number of cars on the road.

anon 12:11PM May 24, 2009

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos