Latest Obama Target: Credit Card Companies and Their Lending Rules

April 27, 2009 RSS Feed Print

On top of job losses, foreclosures, and mounting debt, many Americans are feeling dismayed by the one tool that they thought would allow them to keep spending: their credit cards.

As the economy slides, consumers are finding some nasty surprises on their credit card bills, from lower credit limits to higher fees for late payments. One bank even added a $10 monthly fee to a no-fee credit card (but has since backed off due to public pressure). The changes can also hit those who pay their bills fully and on time. Some customers who take on new debts, for instance, can be hit with lower credit ratings, which can trigger higher interest rates.

Facing growing public anger, government officials are taking their concerns public. Last week, the House Financial Services Committee approved a bill that would restrict practices that sponsor Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York calls "unfair, deceptive, anticompetitive," and "just plain bad for consumers." The Obama administration, which is planning a broad push on consumer finance issues, called in executives from 14 credit card companies last Thursday to press them to clamp down on the practices. The White House also unveiled its own list of proposals for the bill, including "no more fine print" in forms sent to cardholders and more-stringent industry oversight.

The credit card industry sees itself primarily as a scapegoat of the financial crisis. As unemployment climbs, issuers say, more people are failing to pay on time, hurting their credit ratings and triggering higher interest rates. "Interest is always covering losses," says Nessa Feddis, vice president of the American Banking Association, the industry's trade association. "You can't lend out $10 to 10 people, get $90 back, and then have money to lend to other people." Financial firms also worry that some of the proposed restrictions could limit the volume of lending.

Legislators, not to mention their constituents, aren't convinced. When the Federal Reserve took up the issue in December, it received more than 60,000 comments on its proposed changes in regulations. The result was a crackdown on practices like "two-cycle billing," in which a cardholder who pays the entire account balance one month but not the next gets charged interest on the average of both months of debt. The regulations take effect in July 2010.

While the rules are a good start, says Maloney, the government needs to codify them. "Regulation can easily be changed or delayed," she says. "It can be challenged and evaded far more easily than a law." Her bill, which could go to a vote next week, goes further by, for instance, allowing consumers to choose their own lower credit limits. The Senate's companion legislation would be stricter still, banning companies from issuing cards to people under 21.

The debate is as much political as economic. Because some of the companies engaging in the practices have received more than $120 billion in bailout funds, the issue is a potential tripwire for the Obama administration, which is still smarting from the uproar over executive bonuses at the government-bailed-out American International Group. "We need more accountability in the system," Obama said after last week's meeting. Credit card issuers who ignore the rules, he added, "will feel the full weight of the law."

Whether they like it or not, change may be coming to credit cards. And not the kind that plastic is meant to replace.

Tags:
credit cards,
credit,
Obama administration,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Master Card from GM, (HSBC), who I have been with for quite some time, sent a letter, undated. In it stated that my account would, as of 11/19/09, no longer be at a fixed 9.99%, but at a variable, which would be as of 8/31/09, 16.99%. I can agree to keep the card or not. WHY would a company such as this, do this to a customer who has never missed a payment, (which is usually more than is required), with credit scores, (mine above 760 and my wifes above 740)? Not a good business practice would you say? I certainly would like some sort of explaination that would condone such a practice.

If anyone would care to get back to me it would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You.

Thomas W. Devereaux, Jr. of GA 9:02AM October 10, 2009

I feel if the Banks can get an Bail-out and receive Government money...We should be allowed to claim the interest charges when we file our income Taxes .As it was years ago,when we made less money . Todays' some of us have no jobs +no raises+our money is being used to Bail-Out the Banks.......

The Internal Revenue Services has more pity , than the Banks and Credit Cards Companies, which Credit cards holders has made them to the height and level they are in these days.....While some 0f us deceided to live like the Jones...with a little more than we needed. Buying on credit and saving on 401k, due to the Banks do not pay interest on an saving accounts. There is no more saving Banks, only Commerical Banks, which they can pay their CEO's commissions and trips+++++While people have lost on their savings....

Emma Westbrook of FL 6:48PM July 16, 2009

It seems that the admin is finally doing something about credit cards. Unfortunately for me, this comes way too late. I lost my job while at a critical medical crisis and got behind on ONE card. They hit me with a penalty and raised my rate by 10%. The next month, all my cards raised my rates considerably. With the fees and rates piling up, it was as if the companies were begging me to file bankruptcy. I was lucky enough to find an honest debt settlement company that cut my payments in half and will have me out of debt in 2 years (Thanks Rob at DRC 858-483-9600 x104), but it would have been nice to save the agony by being able to work directly with all the cards at once. In fact, that's why I went to Rob at DRC. It seemed the credit card companies were all working in concert against me (they all seemed tipped off by that one missed payment) so I wanted to work w/ a group that bulked me in with thousands of others in my position, which leveled the playing field and brought the card companies into a more negotiable mood.

Sharon H. of CA 12:54PM May 04, 2009

advertisement

Latest Video