Why Many Iraqi Refugees Who Want to Settle in Detroit Are Being Sent Elsewhere

Reader Comments

Back to article

If you read the article, Al, then you understand these are mostly Catholic Iraqis coming to Detroit. You write that unemployed Muslims make mayhem, but I would argue that unemployed anythings make mayhem.

I live in Detroit and I welcome any Iraqi refugee. They've had a positive impact to my region culturally and economically. They don't "make mayhem" as you suggest. It's great to have so many ethnic enclaves in this city. Dearborn has a huge Arab population, Hamtramck Polish population, and it allows for some great opportunities that we otherwise wouldn't have. If we need the FBI to set up shop in the D, it will be to watch our corrupt politicians and inner-city violence, NOT to watch our Arab population.

DC of MI 1:36PM February 12, 2009

Unless the FBI is going to build a regional headquarters in the greater Detroit area to keep tabs on this situation, continued influx of Iraqis should be discontinued. I thought the SURGE was a success! Unemployed Muslims make mayhem.

al of NM 3:09PM December 28, 2008

Bishop's fear for Iraqi Christians

The Bishop of Norwich, the Right Rev. Graham James: speaking out on plight of Iraqi Christians

SHAUN LOWTHORPE

23 December 2008 06:00

The Bishop of Norwich last night launched a thinly veiled attack on the government's pursuit of war in Iraq claiming it had led to the persecution of fellow Christians in that country.

Wading into a potential clash with ministers, the Rt Rev Graham James said an overwhelmingly secular mindset at the heart of government, and a poor understanding of faith in other parts of the world had fuelled a policy which had left hundreds of thousands of Iraqi Christians in greater danger than ever before.

For centuries Christian groups have been tolerated in Iraq and even Saddam Hussein's former deputy Tariq Aziz was a Christian.

But since the fall of Saddam, five years ago, more than two-thirds of Christians, around 300,000 people, have either fled the country or faced persecution or torture because Iraqis wrongly believe they are linked to western governments.

On the eve of Christmas, Bishop Graham said both Britain and America were guilty of a “religious illiteracy” which had led to a lack of understanding about the fallout from the occupation, adding that it was tragic that two western powers with a strong Christian tradition may have almost eclipsed one of the longest surviving churches in the world.

And they had failed to do more to protect Christians and other minority groups.

“The consequences of the war have been terrible for the Christian community in Iraq, there's an irony about this,” he said. “There have been examples of hostages being taken and churches being looted and burned. The thing that people do not always recognise about Iraq is that it has one of the oldest Christian churches in the world that's been there since before Mohammed was born. These churches have always been recognised by the majority muslin population.

“There is this mindset which tends to see religion as something of private significance to people,” he added. “I don't think that the majority of the advisors to the British and American government had any idea of what the consequences would be. That suggests to me that religion and its place in the world isn't taken seriously enough.”

It is the second time in the last week where a senior Church of England cleric has been critical of government policies. Last week the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams clashed with Gordon Brown after stating that the government's plan to stave off the recession by boosting spending and borrowing were like “an addict returning to the drug”.

Bishop Graham said he decided to speak out because he was disappointed that the Prime Minister had failed to mention the plight of Christians in Iraq when he set out a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq last week. He said the issue had also largely been ignored by the media.

Last week he also raised the issue during a speech in the House of Lords when, in addition, he pressed ministers for assurances that measures would be in place to help returning servicemen cope with the psychological effects of the war.

“It would seem very strange to me if a Christian bishop did not speak out on behalf of Christians in other parts of the world where they are suffering,” Bishop Graham added. “While nothing much to do with the western church one of the by-products of the war is to be treated with suspicion.

“A significant minority of the Iraqi population were Christian. There's been at least two-thirds that have either left or been marginalised and in some circumstances killed.”

Bishop Graham said he had contact with one of the churches, St Georges in Baghdad, where he had learned of the persecution faced by Christians. One of the worst acts saw the murder of the Archbishop of the Chaldean Church in March.

of 3:50AM December 28, 2008

We live in an ever more globalized world today. Anything we do can have a consequence on the other side of the world. The Iraqi war is a great example. The United States was blindly submitted to the lies of the individuals with power over our communication networks. We collectively sat in ignorance as our military forces were commanded to violate the lives of innocent people in Iraq. Hence, it is our obligation to take responsibility for our actions and provide the refugees with the love they deserve.

Henrik of MN 4:45PM December 25, 2008

It's noble of the USA to be the ''hostest-with-the-mostest'' and the first ones to help, like after natural disasters but recent wars have brought a flood of Koreans and other south east Asians into this country some grateful for our help and others thinking we owed them a new life.

A short course of past history would point out to them that if they stayed in their own counrty and offered to help their country could be like Germany,Italy,Japan,Korea all GNP leaders of the world. WOW ,good old Uncle Sam or is uncle-sucker !

Right on Bad Bob.

of CA 5:26PM December 24, 2008

They should move them to another city and back to their own country. Let them fight for their freedom like we did, not come over here and get everything handed to them by our stupid government. Our men and women go over there to fight for their freedom and what to they do to thank them, nothing, accept come over here and turn our country into what their's is now, crap.

BadBob of MI 9:43PM December 23, 2008

Well maybe we shouldn't have invaded their country, eh?

You don't want them here? Maybe we should have elected Gore instead of the clown that's about to leave.

Bob of AR 9:18PM December 23, 2008

"...their benefits may not transfer with them." Exactly who the Hell is paying for these benefits, how much are they, and how do foreigners qualify to receive benefits when Americans are hurting?

Americans need to hit the streets with lots of rope looking for politicians with which to decorate lamp posts.

An Old Conservative Gone Radical of AZ 4:04PM December 23, 2008

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

Photo Galleries

Wildfires

Erratic wildfires move through the western states.

advertisement

Latest Video