What's Happening to the American Family : Interview with Dr. Margaret Mead, Noted Anthropologist

May 16, 2008 RSS Feed Print

This story originally appeared in the May 20, 1963, issue of U.S.News & World Report.

Are today's young parents equal to their job?

Americans are marrying younger now, often starting families before they finish school. What is the effect on the children, on parents and grandparents? Is the  modern husband too tied down to household chores to make the best of himself? And how about working mothers?

In this exclusive interview a prominent expert on the family, Dr. Margaret Mead, discusses the changed patten of American home life.

At New York City

Q  Dr. Mead, what is happening to family life in America?

A  No society that has survived has ever been quite like ours today. Ours is made up largely of isolated families. The children are totally dependent on their fathers and mothers, with no other relatives to fall back on, or neighbors, or anybody. Yet we are coming to think that the only form of possible life is this kind of "nuclear" family. That could be dangerous.

Q  "Nuclear" family? What's that?

It is father and mother and several young children—just what you can pack in a station wagon. No children past their middle teens—any others are expected to be away in college, or working. They should, in the popular conception, be out of the house.

Q  Is this a true picture of today's family?

A  This is the popular notion of what the American family should be like. It is what we see in advertisements, what we see on television. So, when people say, "We've got a small family," or, "We've got a big family," they are comparing their family with this image.

And when they say, "We've got an unusual family," they mean "Grandmother lives with us," or something of that sort.

Q  What do you think this type of family life is doing to people?

To begin with, we are forcing everybody to get married. Not only is this the picture of the family everybody is supposed to have sometime, but it's getting to be the family that everybody is supposed to have very early. So the girls are very uncomfortable if they're not married very young. And the boys are beginning to be uncomfortable if they're not married quite young—the average age of marriage for boys has sunk from 27 to 23, for example.

Q  Anything wrong with that?

Well, nobody is going to be interested in doing anything except having children. And you can't run a society if everybody's main interest in life is domestic—if nobody wants to be a Senator or a Governor or a President; if nobody wants to be the inventor, the lonely thinker. The average American man today is more interested in being a father than he is in his career or his job.

Q  Why do you say that?

Most of our young professional people these days have several children before they ever get their final degree.

Twenty years ago, law students talked to other law students about law. Medical students talked to other medical students about medicine. Theological students talked about theology. Now these students are home giving the baby its bottle, or helping with the housework—and they want to be.

Q  Is that necessarily harmful?

It is not harmful for men to help in the home. It is harmful if they sacrifice everything else for it: if they won't accept advancement, if they won't move somewhere else, if they won't take a job that means that they're going to be away from home, if they won't go overseas—if they won't go anywhere or do anything because they are so trapped by the care of a lot of children.

Q  Well, do you think that is the trend nowadays?

A  The American father today is so busy being a father he hasn't time to do his own work.

Q  What about mothers?

A  Today's American mother is one of the hardest-worked women in history.

Q  Why? Doing what?

Tags:
family,
parenting,
relationships

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There is a standard that many live by in which they MUST have a double income to keep up, but if they get a cheaper car, get their shop on less often, get out of the bar or at someone's soiree every weekend, and get rid of other nonessential WANTS then they would realize that a family can be very healthy and happy on one income; and it doesn't have to be that large of an income and they don't have to get rid of everything. This article was from 1963, but if this woman knew where the American Family was headed she may have put more stress on strengthening the nuclear family. It is my experience that the nuclear family looks strong on the outside, but is not very stable behind the closed doors.

Tina of MS 9:51PM May 27, 2011

It seems to me that the female "to do list" has just gotten longer. We are expected to be everything we were before: center of the family unit, manager of the daily home life,wife and lover to a husband, and primary loving caretaker of the children...PLUS we now should hold down a meaningful job that contributes to the economic well-being of the family. Is this progress?

Family units crumble because there is a distinct lack of commitment and shared responsibility for success. Parents are quick to blame outside influences for negative aspects in their children's character, yet fail to provide effective role models through their own behavior. The importance of a solid family unit grounded by unconditional love and genuine involvement cannot be underestimated when viewing the success or failure (trends) of future generations

Life Traveler of FL 4:19PM January 19, 2011

I understand that Dr. Mead's ideas don't work well in our society at the present time but she was writing in 1963. Now that women are dominating universities and the professional arena, can anyone see how this idea of women's liberation has negatively affected men's lives? Maybe I just know a lot of lazy guys but it seems like a trend now that men have given up all their responsibilities and are leaving it up to the women (their girlfriends and moms) to take care of everything. It just seems that the more women progress, the more men regress.

Not wanting to blame it all on the guys, today's society is far too demanding. It's ridiculous that people have to hold 2 jobs to support a family. Those that are actually in need of assistance are too proud to ask for it and the other people are getting handouts like crazy (I'm sorry, I know this is a completely different topic).

Moving on, the main thing is looking in our history and recognizing the trend. As our society becomes more and more individualistic the families become more isolated which lands the responsibility on fewer people. How realistic is it for a single mother to raise a family successfully while working to put food on the table? All I can hope is that I learned from my parents' mistakes to not repeat them for the next generation.

Overachieving young adult female. of GA 11:01AM August 31, 2009

advertisement

Latest Video