Ranking the Politics of Supreme Court Justices

Four of the five most conservative justices since 1937 are on the bench today

May 12, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)
Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

Just how conservative is the Supreme Court, anyway? It's a question that has dogged constitutional scholars for years, as they've tried to parse the opaque language and muddled writings of judges moving through the confirmation process. Today's court, headed by John Roberts with seven justices appointed by Republican presidents, is generally considered more conservative than the Supreme Court of the 1950s, for example, when Earl Warren oversaw its unanimous decision in Brown v. Board of Education. But it's hard to compare the current court—and today's justices—with, say, the Burger court of the 1970s, which, with six Republican-appointed justices, decided Roe v. Wade.

John McCain, for one, doesn't seem to want to take any chances. Last week, he joined a long line of Republican presidential candidates who have pushed for a more conservative court when he promised to make Samuel Alito and John Roberts his "models" for judicial appointments.

But how conservative would a McCain presidency make the court—and how conservative is it already? The answers to these questions may be found in a new paper by Richard Posner, a judge who sits on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and William Landes, a law professor at the University of Chicago, that is now making its way through the academic community. In "Rational Judicial Behavior: A Statistical Study," Posner and Landes use a database that includes the political background and voting records of the past 70 years of Supreme Court justices—who appointed each justice and how the justices decided every case—to come up with a ranking, from most conservative to least conservative, of the 43 justices who have served on the court since 1937.

Their conclusion: Four of the five most conservative justices to serve on the Supreme Court since Franklin Roosevelt, including Roberts and Alito, are currently sitting on the bench today. Justice Anthony Kennedy, another current Republican appointee, is ranked No. 10. (The table has a full list.) Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, the two current justices nominated by Democratic presidents, are among the 15 "least conservative" justices of the past 70 years. Thurgood Marshall, who became the first black Supreme Court justice when he was appointed in 1967, has the most liberal voting record on the list. Clarence Thomas, the second black justice, who was appointed to the court in 1991, is ranked the most conservative.

NUMBER OF CONSERVATIVE VOTES ON U.S. SUPREME COURT, 1937-2006

10 "Most Conservative" Justices

Justice Name Percentage
Conservative
Votes
Thomas .822
Rehnquist .815
Scalia .757
Roberts .753
Alito .740
Burger .735
O'Connor .680
Powell .677
Whittaker .673
Kennedy .647

10 "Least Conservative" Justices

Justice Name Percentage
Conservative
Votes
Marshall .211
Douglas .213
Murphy .241
Rutledge .247
Goldberg .248
Brennan .265
Black .283
Warren .308
Ginsburg .312
Cardozo .333

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These findings may not come as a surprise to political scientists, who have devised a range of techniques over the years for calculating judicial nominees' political ideologies, often based on their records before joining the Supreme Court. But Posner and Landes have taken their research a step further, examining the actual voting records of justices while they were sitting on the bench. To do this, they've relied on a database created by Harold Spaeth, a political scientist at Michigan State University, which codes each vote made on the Supreme Court between 1937 and 2006 as either "liberal," "conservative," "mixed," or "both." If a justice votes in favor of a defendant on a criminal procedure case, that vote is considered "liberal." If the justice votes against the plaintiff in a civil rights case, the vote is considered "conservative."

Tags:
Democratic Party,
John McCain,
Republican Party,
politics,
Supreme Court

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I ,they shall question word of fool who express word whatever to extent ( Anyway ) feel better subject adj. produce e small thing yet every day i can again present opinion explain word Judicial; functions come again anyway liberal yet conservative ANYWAY WHAT WAS QUESTION , not remember if i hear anyway OR WHAT IS DIFFERENT FROM COMING AND GOING " REPLY IF ANY PHRASE SPELLED IS ONE OR TWO YET THREE WAY STOP :. all but shall i know every i can't FINISH unspecified ADVERB CAUSE SPELLING CHOOSE I CANNOT UNLESS SHOW EFFECT LAW CAUSE LAY IT ON ON NAME OF THE LAW CHOOSE ,I,RAY A SAUCEDO ON DOWN UP AROUND ON YOUR FACE IF YOUR SENSE FAIL YOU TO DAY ANYWAY I HAVE A APPOINTMENT WITH SOME COURT THAT COUNTY OF IMPERIAL , MY JUDGMENT CALL IT BELIEF , THEY DO IT ANYWAY AS LONG AS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA SHOW A SUM AS THE JOKER IN BLACK ORDERS JOKERS TOTAL COLLECTION FOLLOW AS HE SHE THEY CALL THE JAIL I SEND YOU OVER FEW MORE SEND BILL TO CLOWNS AT D.C CLAIM XXXX , IS LEGAL WHO CARES WE ABOVE LAW AND ANYWAY THE AMOUNT $$ STARTED AT ZERO BUT COUNT COUNTING ANY MORE SEND MY WAY SATISFIED RAT RODENT WAITING BETRAYS AN RAY TRUCK LIKE A WOMEN DID NOT FIGHT BACK WHY NO MATTER HOW HE SAY IT WE DO , WAIT ANYWAY GOOD SAID PIPING IT AT CAPITAL SNORTING COKE JAIL STATE EARN A FAVORABLE INCOME SO AT CLOSE TO FIVE WE GET PIE TOGO, EASY THEY DON'T COUNT AND WE HOLD HIGH GROUND WHY WE DO COUNTING QUESTION WHAT SEE SIMPLY CALL ME MONEY MAN SAID JUDGE LET CUT PIE WAIT SAUCEDO HAS CASH WARRANT TO GET YOU TO 1 TAKE MONEY 2 JAIL YOU 3 ABSOLUTE CONVICTION SAID ANYWAY YOU CAN'T MAKE A LIVING HER MR SAUCEDO I, SAUCEDO WILL TELL THEY LOOK BLACK COLOR TO GOOD FOR YOU SUPERIOR COURT OF LOW RANK CALIFORNIA , CHANGE ROBE JOKERS EL CENTRO COURT O TOO LOOSE GOOSE I SEE COSTUME TRY GREEN MIGHT YA YOU LOOK BETTER IN GREEN CAUSE ONLY GREATEST CHIEF WEAR ROBE DRESS NO FLOWING GOWN NO SIMPLE THEY WHEN IN MATTER OF LAW THEY PUT ON ROBE , COLOR O YA CALL ME A WOMEN CAUSE I DON'T FIGHT YOU MEN THAT GIVE OUR YET NOT FROM WHAT I SEE YOUR FINAL, CALL ON MATTER YET l , I HAVE MY UNION OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPREME COURT OF LAND THE HIGHEST DEGREE AND ULTIMATE LAW AND WILL SEE, Mr.Cheif JUSTICE ROBERTS , sorry to call on you i know you have , no time yet i when you have spare time , never mine this matter is low rank i take as lady but here i note cause this that i might snap and pardon do to there no stop attacks and no respect for laws anyway they have what car truck money pets the put to sleep and remove me from my home and order me out why cause my money does it matter no i have noting yet god above all shall let them know so say i did not know excuse don't ask me ask god CASE SUBSTITUTION person so yet not all schoolboy would know everything cause lets not forget schoolgirl Anyway yet any is right way as to i hand down yield cause you drive where i hold right way wrong way,

look at CITATION a80421 IMPERIAL COUNTY SHERIFF CORONER MARSHALL , HE ALSO TAKEN MY DRINKSOD

Ramon Saucedo of CA 9:34AM July 27, 2012

If a justice votes in favor of a defendant on a criminal procedure case, that vote is considered "liberal." If the justice votes against the plaintiff in a civil rights case, the vote is considered "conservative."

Uh isn't it possible the the evidence shows that the [alledged] criminal is right, or that the plaintiff is wrong and that, not the justices political leaning is the reason for their vote?

This is completely bogus study!

Sean Wisner of FL 9:39AM April 08, 2012

no mike of md. your solution of what methodology is not sound. It is biased by your personal political leaning. literally in your case. you are projecting your ideology on your own made up conclusion of that methodology.

If a justice votes in favor of a defendant on a criminal procedure case, that vote is considered 'liberal.' If the justice votes against the plaintiff in a civil rights case, the vote is considered 'conservative.'" Could be seen as voting against the criminal or voting for the business as in the civil case. Same way as the Anti Abortion mantle is given versus the Pro choice mantle of their opposition. That 'way' points out the negativity of the stance. It is what we also point out when we are pointing out something. So, you are pointing out your biases and I belive those are right/conservative leaning. Am I wrong?

theywors that of AL 10:24PM December 20, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos