With New Afghanistan Plan, Obama Makes the War His Own

The new strategy calls for extra troops and civilians, but it also reveals limits on America's role

March 30, 2009 RSS Feed Print

President Obama may have inherited the war in Afghanistan, but when the White House rolled out its plan on Friday for the way forward there, he effectively made the seven-year-old conflict his own.

Up until now, the president has been working around the margins. He has hired a South Asia czar and other advisers and has signed off on 17,000 more combat troops to arrive to volatile southern Afghanistan by summer's end. Planning for the latter move began before the election.

The major elements of the new White House strategy include bench-marks for progress and a surge of civilians, among them U.S. diplomats and agricultural experts. This initiative comes after months of warnings that the U.S. military cannot win the war by itself. "Going forward," Obama said on Friday, "we will not blindly stay the course."

Obama also announced he will send another contingent of U.S. troops. Some 4,000 military trainers will mentor Afghan soldiers and police to do their jobs in an increasingly violent land, where U.S. casualties have been steadily increasing.

Behind the scenes, defense officials warn that the new benchmarks, which the administration is still developing, must include stepped-up efforts to counter the pervasive corruption within the Afghan government. To say that Kabul is losing credibility among Afghans is an understatement, some add: Their own government is also humiliating and enraging them.

The White House plan boosts aid to Pakistan as well, but it tacitly underscores the limits of U.S. power there. Ending safe havens in Pakistan is widely seen as pivotal to tamp down violence in Afghanistan. The CIA continues to conduct Predator drone strikes, though debate rages about whether the al Qaeda operatives killed in these attacks are worth the fury caused by civilian casualties. Beyond that, America's options in Pakistan seem uncomfortably narrow.

Tags:
Pakistan,
Obama administration,
Barack Obama,
Afghanistan,
military,
al Qaeda,
CIA,
national security terrorism and the military,
military strategy,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
foreign policy

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Direction!!!! Did it ever have any 'direction'. Anyone and everyone involved in the process of this invasion should have known that winning in this country was bound to fail. This is an extremely tribal country and has never been pacified by anyone....not even the largest army in the world led by Alexander the Great succeeded and this was an army that had conquered everywhere it fought and finally had to give up and leave. What makes the US think that they can succeed where the best had failed.

Book: 'The Afghan Campaign' by Steven Pressfield

This should have been REQUIRED READING by those who inflicted this war upon not only the people of Afghanistan but on the troops themselves.

Fran Greenfield 12:41PM April 16, 2009

I think this war has lost direction. The basis of invading Iraq Afghanistan was that of greed. Obama has got to reverse that greed and offer something else that he himself does not have and worse enough does not know it. The viet war was defined and ultimate goals were clear. However none was achieved. Now, Afghanistan

Baluwa 4:27AM April 15, 2009

If and when things bog down there, I bet cream puff will harp on the "I inherited this ..." just as he has on everything else since inauguration for the position that he campaigned for three years!!

Ken of WI 11:49AM April 01, 2009

Photo Galleries

Wildfires

Erratic wildfires move through the western states.

advertisement

Latest Video