Gates Wants to Send More U.S. Troops to Afghanistan, but How Many?

December 11, 2008 RSS Feed Print

KANDAHAR, AFGHANISTAN—On what was originally planned as his farewell tour, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates gave some indication en route to Afghanistan this week of how difficult he believes it will be to come up with the right balance of troops in the war-torn country.

Gen. David McKiernan, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, has been vocal about his desire to nearly double the number of U.S. troops on the ground, from 32,000 to somewhere between 55,000 and 60,000. McKiernan and others have been worried that current troop levels might not be not sufficient to defeat a multipronged insurgency.

As he headed to Kandahar to meet with McKiernan, Gates told reporters that the Pentagon was "going to try and get" two additional brigade combat teams, or some 7,000 to 10,000 troops, to Afghanistan "by summertime." Plans for additional brigades, he said, are yet to be determined.

These comments come on the heels of remarks by Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. troops in the Middle East and Central Asia, that he had "already made recommendations" to nearly double the number of U.S. forces currently in Afghanistan.

"The consensus has emerged that more troops are needed to provide security" there, Gates said during a town hall meeting with troops Thursday.

But he sounded a repeated note of caution about what has been widely called a "surge" for Afghanistan. In Iraq, there is a "considerable interest," he noted, in keeping "as much of our strength there as we can" through the provincial elections, scheduled to take place throughout Iraq early next year. The Pentagon is still figuring out how it will adjust troop deployments on the heels of the newly signed Status of Forces Agreement, or SOFA, he added, which requires U.S. forces to be out of all populated areas by June.

Gates also cautioned against an overreliance on foreign troops in Afghanistan, a country where the history of outside military forces, he added, often has "not been a happy one." He noted that the Soviets "couldn't win in Afghanistan with 120,000 troops, and they clearly didn't care about civilian casualties." Gates said that he would "like to put a lot more stress" on accelerating the growth of the Afghan Army and putting the Afghans "out front." It is "their country, their fight, their future."

Getting the basics right is key, Gates added, and there is one point in particular with which the Pentagon continues to grapple: "Figuring out how many foreign troops is too many in terms of being successful, and I think that still is an unanswered question—and may well be for some period of time."

Tags:
David Petraeus,
David McKiernan,
military,
national security terrorism and the military,
Afghanistan,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Iraq,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
military strategy

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Have you ever noticed that wherever we go, war follows? The reason for 9-11 to begin with is our lopsided involvement in the middleast {blind alegenge to Israel}. If we want peace {which we really don't}, we have to first stop shooting at them. Everytime we kill an Arab, we create more terrorists. There isn't a one of you that couldn't be a terrorist under the right circumstances, say kill your family for example. What we really need to do is end all aid to all countries and all military involvement. Our tax money should stay at home and maybe after about 10 years of minding our oun business it will be safe to travel and we will get some respect back.

Dane of ND 4:12PM June 05, 2010

this is a good artical!!!!

grant of MN 11:48AM February 10, 2010

War is not about the promotion of indeceny, immodesty, sexuality,homosexuality, abortion, swearing. It is about violent people who live in violent countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq. These people who live in these countries have no respect for human life what so ever. They especially have no respect for Americans or any one person that is white in color. I have been to Afghanistan and I have seen albino Afghans. If they would be captured by the Taliban, they would be killed because of their color. It is not that person that is at fault. It is not their fault they were born that way. Does anyone that will read my comment know why that albino would be killed? How about I help you all out on this one. Its because the Taliban thinks that their mother was raped by a Russian. The Taliban hates Russia as much as they hate America. The war is based on the lack of respect for the white race any and all aspects. Please feel free to reply to my comments.

Del Holland of MO 10:31PM January 26, 2010

advertisement

Latest Video