Iraq's Parliament Sets U.S. Troop Pullout Deadline

U.S.-Iraq accord lets troops stay for now, but says they must be out by the end of 2011

November 28, 2008 RSS Feed Print

While Americans celebrated Thanksgiving yesterday, the Iraq government rejoiced over its own "historic day," in Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's words, with Parliament ratifying a security agreement to have U.S. troops leave by the end of 2011.

The pact, which passed 149 to 35, grants the United States legal basis to remain in the country. The United Nations mandate authorizing the American presence expires on December 31. Iraq's presidency council still must agree to the pact for it to become law, but this is expected to occur in the next several days.

By setting a deadline for American withdrawal, the agreement represented a victory for the Iraqi government. It also was a victory in another way: It showed that the government could overcome fractious political and ethnic issues to agree on a compromise. Issues that had stalled the agreement included how oil revenues would be divided and what would happen to the city of Kirkuk. Earlier this week, some lawmakers argued that the pact didn't protect Iraq's oil wealth against being seized to resolve legal claims against Saddam Hussein's government.

The vote on the pact itself had been delayed at the last minute in an attempt to satisfy Iraq's biggest Sunni party. The Iraqi Islamic Party had wanted a nationwide referendum on the issue, the abolition of a criminal court trying Saddam Hussein's former government officials, and the lifting of restrictions on appointing former Baathists to government jobs.

Many Iraqis also opposed the pact, particularly out of anger that the United States would be allowed to stay for another three years. Nearly 10,000 of them, mostly Shiites, protested the agreement in Baghdad last week.

In the agreement that passed, many, if not all, of the various groups' issues were addressed. One law included requires a referendum on the pact in July 2009. Other Sunni demands that were recognized included enforcing an amnesty law for detainees held in Iraq, and for a better balance among religious sects in the security forces.

Other aspects of the pact curb American power, particularly to conduct operations, detain Iraqis, and search homes. The agreement also gives Iraqi officials oversight over U.S. forces.

The question now, of course, is whether Iraq is ready for the U.S. military to begin its withdrawal.

  • Read more about Iraq.
Tags:
military,
national security terrorism and the military,
Iraq,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
military strategy

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

i am getting ready to go on my first deployment to iraq as you are probley reading this.. do i want to go over their to a war that i do not agree with??? NO i do not, BUT that is something that i have to do, something that i said i would do for this country.. all of the sons and daughters that lost their lives to this war knew that threat when they enlisted in the service. i do feel that a pull out of iraq should happen, i do feel that it is money wasted.. that money could help our own struggling economy. but until that day comes when my commander in chief tells me to come home i will do the duty that myself and so many brave soliders, airman, marines, and saliors have done before me and with me, and that is do whatever it takes to provide safety to the US, its people, and everyone serving beside me...

adkins of OH 10:42PM November 30, 2008

The idea to bring everyone home and ignore what can and likely will happen is foolish and short-sighted. In the long run it will cost more both in blood and dollars because we will end up having to go back. Do it right the first time!

Scott of MN 9:30PM November 28, 2008

We need to get out of Iraq, but quick. We cannot afford to be spending $10-12 billion a month anymore. As over-burdened and hard-working taxpayers (those of us who are lucky to still have a job) must demand the immediate withdrawal of troops. I don't give a damn what McCain or the other Republicans say. Their only interest in staying in the war is financial, it would be real interesting to see who really benefits from our being in this ill-advised and costly war. We will never know the true cost of Iraq since Bush has never been open about the billions of dollars we have spent on Iraq, billions of dollars that have gone to the Bush/Cheney buddies like Halliburton and Blackwater. There has never been any transparency, on the contrary, much of the expenses have been hidden from the taxpayer. The Iraqi's don't want us and the Americans don't want to sacrifice the lives of their sons and daughters in this bloody war. I'll bet the sons of McCain or Palin are not sent to the front where they can risk their lives, they are given a safe job behind the sons of many American families. Only those who benefit financially from this war will want to continue, the decent, hard-working and christian families of America want us out asap.

Ann of IA 2:25PM November 28, 2008

advertisement

Latest Video