Pecora Hearings a Model for Financial Crisis Investigation

Congress could learn from Pecora's 1930s investigation of the stock market crash

September 29, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

Now, 75 years later, the country is mired in another financial crisis, one that includes similar outcries over bankers' bonuses and sales of risky products. With it comes the new congressional commission. Its framework is far different from the investigation that Pecora oversaw. The Pecora hearings were held by a Senate committee, meaning that, technically, they weren't a commission; the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is an independent panel appointed by Congress, an approach that began with the Continental Congress and picked up steam in the post-World War II era. Commission members and chairs are typically appointed by Congress, sometimes in conjunction with the president, and the number of members usually ranges between five and 15. Many observers believe the commission could have a sweeping effect similar to that of the Pecora hearings. Much of that will depend on the panel's leadership: chairman Phil Angelides, California's Democratic state treasurer from 1999 to 2007, and executive director Thomas Greene, a lawyer in the California attorney general's office.

Pecora, who gained such prominence that the probe is now referred to as the "Pecora hearings," was the perfect man for the job. He had a nearly photographic memory, allowing him to recall every word of testimony; a sharp intellect (he graduated from the New York public school system at age 13); and a tireless work ethic. And, having emigrated from Sicily to an Irish neighborhood in New York at the age of 5, he had developed the kind of outsider's resolve that made him impervious to intimidation.

In his 12 years as assistant district attorney of New York County, Pecora oversaw more than 1,000 cases and boasted an 80 percent conviction rate. One investigation led to the closing of more than 150 "bucket shop" operators, or fraudulent brokerage houses, in New York City. "What he didn't have was the experience going after the lords of finance and the people that everyone was deferential to," says Donald Ritchie, an associate Senate historian who wrote about the hearings for the book Congress Investigates, 1792-1974: A Documented History. "So he essentially took on the lords of finance the same way he did the petty criminals."

In those days, the nation's top bankers were as unknowable and untouchable as their arcane business practices. But Pecora didn't seem fazed by the financiers he questioned, including banking scion J. P. "Jack" Morgan Jr., making the first public appearance by a Morgan in 20 years. At one point, after several minutes of Morgan ducking queries, Pecora cut him off. "Are you an attorney?" he asked. Morgan said he was not. "I thought you were, because you answer questions the way lawyers are reputed to answer them," Pecora said. "That is a compliment that I supposed I would never be good enough to get," Morgan replied. "That is not a compliment," Pecora said crisply. "It is said that lawyers make the worst witnesses."

It was Pecora's methodical, prosecutorial style that was a particularly effective tool. That persistence wasn't always appreciated, even by the senators. As Pecora hammered Morgan about his income taxes, Sen. Carter Glass, a patrician Virginia Democrat known to be "bored by senatorial exhibitionism," complained that the counsel was "badgering" the banker. But that badgering led to the revelation that Morgan had not paid a dime of income taxes in 1930, 1931, or 1932.

More crucially, Pecora's persistence led to insights into private banking without which the groundbreaking regulations of the 1930s could not have been passed. The public learned how the so-called House of Morgan, the most powerful bank in the country, doled out financial privileges as a way to wield influence, including the fact that more than 60 other prominent bankers had outstanding loans with the bank. And they learned that the Chase Securities Corp. helped finance eight stock pools, which were made up of investors whose purchases together could artificially boost the price of a stock.

Tags:
stock market

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Historically, the for-profit capitalist system creates Booms & Busts, all planned long before they hit victims & wreck our lives. When presidents, their appointees & judges attack "socialism," it's proof they're setting up the next Bust. When anything is subsidized by taxes, it's a socialistic project. Our military is 100 % socialist. It's in "public ownership." When you see the phrase "privatization," that means investors bought assets created by taxpayers. In a way, California's Land Grant Colleges, created & staffed with taxes, were privatized when Gov. Reagan automatically became a regent. He & other regents who prefer church schools, imposed tuition. His banker pals made student loans. Fewer people went to college. He took tax-created assets of taxpayers & diverted them to private use. The current Bust made me lose 80% of the value of stocks I own. The Enron mess, caused by insiders, made employees lose money they need for retirement. Some will be forced to use welfare -meaning taxpayers subsidize the Enron criminal acts. Don't be scared into fearing public ownership Socialism.

auradawn veirs of CA 5:50PM October 08, 2009

about the smallest lady and the richest man is a parable for why you will only get meaningful reforms of anything by stunt and by accident.

The "traditional" investigators are always in somebody's pocket if they are appointed by Republicans---and sometimes even if appointed by Democrats. (That's why they get appointed.)

You're only lucky you even have Obama's folks willing to ask any questions at all at this time. Bush's wouldn't have and Huckabee's, Romney's or Palin's won't---if you go down that path.

As for the guy below who thinks it's all the fault of Acorn? Well, he's from Texas----that explains his position.

Muser of NM 1:59PM September 30, 2009

When looking for the answers tothe emltdown, I hope they will investigate members of Congress (i.e. arney Frank, Chris Dodd, nancy Polosie) who reported that Fannie may and Freddie Mac were doing just fine as Senator McCain and others pointed out the handwriting on the wall.

Entitlement programs should not be measured successful for the amount of money they hand out. There should be a follow up (3-5 years?) to see how many peole they actually helped get out of poverty. Results count!

When you loan money to people who can'a afford to pay it back, your in trouble. When you loan 100% of value, the people are tennants/renters, not homeowners. Nothing wrong with being a renter and you can walk away from it at the end of the lease no problem.

It may be interesting to investigate how groups like ACORN shamed lending institution and Federal officials into bending the rules to let unqualified applicants get loans.it's water under the bridge, but let's not let emotions cloud business decissions when handing out other peoples' money.

rlcardo55 of TX 1:28PM September 30, 2009

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

advertisement

Quizzes

The D-Day Invasion

Test your knowledge of the invasion of Europe on June 6, 1944.

The Kennedy Family

How much do you know about this political dynasty?

First Ladies

Test your knowledge of presidential spouses.

Presidential Pets

Get to know the furry (and scaly) members of the first family.

FDR's New Deal

How much do you know about the economic stimulus of the 1930s?

Air Force One

Test your knowledge of the president's private plane.

advertisement