EPA's Lisa Jackson Is at the Center of Obama's Climate Change Policy

The EPA administrator has moved quickly to undo Bush's environmental legacy

March 31, 2009 RSS Feed Print

TOP ENVIRONMENT PLAYER

Since taking over the Environmental Protection Agency, Administrator Lisa Jackson has moved quickly to reconsider several controversial Bush-era environmental decisions, signaling that the agency under her direction will play a very different role from that under recent predecessors.

Nowhere is this change in direction more apparent than in a handful of recent, potentially far-reaching maneuvers related to climate change policy. In January, Jackson directed EPA officials to reconsider California's languishing request to impose stricter greenhouse gas emissions limits on motor vehicles. (The Bush administration denied it in 2007.) More recently, she instructed the agency to review Bush policies that, if changed, could lead to federal regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from coal plants and utilities.

Because these reviews clearly have the White House's backing, Jackson's first few months in office suggest that she will play a critical role in carrying out the administration's climate change policy, even as the details and timing of a carbon dioxide regulation plan remain undecided. Though noting that laws "leave room for policymakers to make policy judgments," she also has pledged "to administer with science as my guide." Jackson comes to the EPA with significant regulatory experience, having served for more than 15 years at the EPA before becoming New Jersey's chief environmental regulator in 2006.

Tags:
EPA,
global warming,
Lisa Jackson,
Obama administration,
energy policy and climate change,
Bush administration,
environment

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

i am up for u!

Jackie Tusing 8:50AM December 20, 2009

I need Your vote:) Please 6 stars! http://konkurs.felgi.pl/zdjecie/Volvo-850-z-ARCASTING-SHARK_545

VOLVO FAN of ID 9:06AM December 10, 2009

If the government was serious about energy it would set up an infrastructure fund that would loan money to build the infrastructure necessary to convert our energy needs to hydrogen and nuclear. Natural gas is the stepping stone to hydrogen, and nuclear will be a long term technology leading to fusion. As I said; if the government was serious it would make the investment. Money is not the issue. It's the energy companies mixed with the politicians who want to drag out the process. Make the investment and keep pumping money back into the program as the private companies payback the government on the investment and we can have what we want in less than 50 years. I will be gone by then but my grandchildren will reap the reward.

Hugh Winter of WA 7:03PM December 08, 2009

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

advertisement

Do you believe that global warming is happening?

View Results

Washington Whispers

Chamber of Commerce Vows to Spend Big in 2012

U.S. Chamber of Commerce says it will continue ad buys, social media strategy to win in 2012

advertisement