Obama Boosts Fuel Economy Standards Despite Detroit's Woes

The increase, the first in more than 25 years, comes as carmakers struggle with the recession

March 27, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Walking a tightrope between keeping its environmental pledges and trying to help struggling U.S. automakers, the Obama administration announced today the first increase in fuel economy standards for cars in more than 25 years. But to the dismay of environmentalists, the new standard doesn't go as far as a proposal that the Bush administration offered in 2008 but quickly abandoned.

The move increases fuel economy standards for light vehicles in 2011 to 27.3 miles per gallon, or 8 percent over the 2010-model-year requirement. New cars will have to meet a standard of 30.2 miles per gallon. The standards will save 887 million gallons of fuel and reduce carbon emissions by 8.3 million metric tons, according to the Department of Transportation.

That's a key first step toward Congress's mandate that automakers by 2020 reach 35 miles per gallon—a 40 percent increase over the current average of 25 miles per gallon. Rep. Edward Markey, who chairs a subcommittee on energy and the environment, said in a statement that the administration's announcement represents a "historic first step."

The Bush administration had made some attempts to rule on the matter with a proposal slightly more ambitious than the one announced today. In April 2008, the government proposed to raise fuel economy standards to 27.8 miles per gallon in 2011. By 2015, it said, it would bring the U.S. average to about 31.6 miles per gallon, a 25 percent increase over current models.

In relation to the Bush administration's record on climate change and its refusal to take the steps to curb emissions that were urged by the Environmental Protection Agency, the proposal seemed ambitious. But, with an estimated price tag to the auto industry of almost $50 billion, the plan was abandoned as the auto industry began to crumble.

The Obama administration has had to carefully balance the needs of Detroit automakers, and the effects of their potential failure on the economy in Michigan and elsewhere, against its pledge to fight climate change. Obama promised during his campaign to support a 4 percent annual increase in efficiency standards, and as officials work now to hammer out a set of efficiency rules applicable through 2015, environmentalists want to make sure that the increase will materialize.

Meanwhile, the next big test will come in May, when it's thought that the administration will make a decision on whether to allow California and 13 other states to enact laws to reduce carbon emissions. Those laws would cut new-vehicle emissions by 30 percent by 2016. In one of his first moves in office, Obama issued a directive ordering the EPA to re-examine the Bush administration's rejection of the states' bid—a worrying sign for automakers.

Read "Environmental Groups Hope Obama Will Rebuild EPA After Bush Years."

Tags:
EPA,
fuel efficiency,
environment,
Obama administration,
Detroit,
energy,
Barack Obama,
car manufacturers

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I understand that we all need to conserve our fuels, ok? But the auto makers already make fuel efficent vehicles for Europe but are not allowed for U.S. sales:(

These U.S. made vehicles for European countries are also safer, being equipped with the European required, double crossed, safety belts that include the standard lap belt. These safety belts are safer and reduces the amount of injury without creating injuries, unlike the U.S. single strap across the shoulder, with lap belt design. The single strap with lap belt design actually creates more injury with broke necks and broken clavical bones. With the double strap with lap, making an X across the driver's and passenger's upper torso, securing the entire upper torso of a person without braking bones. Like the NASCAR safety belts:)

The only reason that I found that the U.S. automakers do not sell these vehicles made for Europe, in the U.S., is because of the lenses. Europe requires an AMBER Colored tail light rather than the RED Colored tail light.

As far as the U.S. automakers being given money? They were given a LOAN...NOT A BAILOUT! The banks and other companies got the BAILOUT money.

lindilu ashbury of NH 12:50PM March 28, 2009

568 Billion WAS the deficit under GWB after 911,Katrina and IKE.

1.9 TRILLION now after 2 months of Obama.

As I stated, we need to wean our dependance on foriegn oil but not by slapping the auto makers with one hand and handing over OUR money with the other.

Chris Petty of GA 10:08PM March 27, 2009

The longest journey begins with that first step. Americans must simply change their consumption habits and what better time for change than when a nation is in a deep economic crisis. Now is the time to increase fuel economy on cars. Down with gas guzzlers regardless of the price of fuel. Up with the economy cars and the electric autos. Government spending on the weatherising of homes should follow soon.Bit by bit the implementation of the Obama energy strategy will contribute to attaining the goal of energy independence.

Dr. Dhanayshar Mahabir 8:48PM March 27, 2009

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

advertisement

Do you believe that global warming is happening?

View Results

Washington Whispers

Duggar Mom Mad at Susan G. Komen

Michelle Duggar upset Susan G. Komen Foundation continues to support Planned Parenthood.

advertisement