McCain Likely to Make ACORN an Issue Until Election Day

The Republican has tried to tie Obama and Democrats to the third-party registration group

October 17, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (41)
An investigator enters the ACORN office in Las Vegas. A Nevada secretary of state's office spokesman said that investigators are looking for evidence of voter fraud at the office.

An investigator enters the ACORN office in Las Vegas.

The U.S. Supreme Court today blocked a lower court order that would have required Ohio election officials to accelerate efforts to root out invalid voter registrations before the November 4 election—a move that critics of the order said could have jeopardized the voting rights of an estimated 200,000 potential new voters.

But the decision is not likely to quiet the Republican-led crusade to identify potentially fraudulent registrations—particularly in battleground states like Ohio, where a conservative organization has filed a racketeering suit against the left-leaning voter registration group ACORN, and Sen. George Voinovich has asked for swift investigations of any fraud allegations.

GOP nominee John McCain and running mate Sarah Palin in recent days have made potential registration irregularities and ACORN the centerpiece of an effort to characterize Democrats as potential future election stealers. In this week's presidential debate, McCain said that ACORN, which has registered 1.3 million new voters this presidential election cycle, could be "destroying the fabric of democracy."

ACORN, which Democratic nominee Barack Obama has worked with in the past and whose affiliate he paid about $800,000 for a get-out-the-vote effort, is one of many third-party organizations that hire people to sign up new voters. It and other groups are required to turn in to election officials all registration cards their workers collect—even the ones that they have flagged as potentially fraudulent. Election officials further cull the list for irregularities. As a result, election experts say, it's rare that noneligible people actually end up voting.

(The New York Times reported earlier this year that despite a five-year Justice Department "crackdown" on voter fraud, only 120 people had been charged and 86 convicted. Most of those charged were Democrats, the newspaper found, and their wrongdoing usually amounted to mistakenly filling out registration forms or misunderstanding eligibility rules.)

Democrats, voting rights groups, and even Republicans like Florida Gov. Charlie Crist have characterized McCain's comments and the latest GOP effort to trumpet registration irregularities as overblown. The American Civil Liberties Union labeled the effort in Ohio to purge lists of new registrants whose names don't match up with government driver's license and Social Security lists as "political maneuvering" intended to intimidate legally registered voters.

ACORN, says one national election official, has "simply become the poster child for all that is problematic with third-party registration." In Washington state two years ago, seven temporary ACORN workers were charged with voter fraud for filling out and submitting more than 1,800 fake cards during a voter registration drive in 2006. No fraudulent votes were cast, however, because election workers discovered the problem before names were added to the rolls. Convicted workers served jail time.

ACORN was required to sign a settlement that mandated increased oversight. "They were put on a short leash," says David Ammons, spokesman for Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed, who had characterized the ACORN workers' actions as the greatest election-related fraud the state had ever seen. "ACORN agreed to pay prosecution costs, to cease and desist questionable behavior, and to have their work reviewed by their own counsel and election authorities," Ammons says. "They were and are under a microscope." He says that ACORN is a "modest presence" in the state this year, and that "no report of any problem has reached our ears."

Election officials have to balance their efforts to root out the potential for fraud with what many experts say is a larger issue: voter intimidation and attempts at suppression. The battle lies in what's excessive and what's reasonable—and that, one election official said, "depends on who you talk to. Who is responsible so voters aren't hurt, participation is protected as is the integrity of the process?" There is increasing agreement across party lines that third-party voter registration groups need better training and oversight for their workers, who often have to meet minimum registration thresholds to get paid. Some state officials have even mulled outright bans on such groups.

But it's clear that at least until Election Day, ACORN will remain a Republican target. McCain issued a statement after the Supreme Court ruling that accused Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner of engaging in "efforts to minimize the level of fairness and transparency in this election." And just this morning, New Mexico Republicans said they "believe 28 people voted fraudulently" in a statehouse primary race in June. New Mexico, like Ohio, is one of the states still in play in the presidential election.

Tags:
Acorn,
2008 presidential election,
John McCain,
fraud,
elections,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (41)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"ACORN caused this bailout problem, not Bush, they intimidated lenders with threats of civil action to get the lenders to make risky loans."

Are you serious? If so, I can only conclude that you are utterly dim.....

Your statement is completely false and without one shred of proof. You must have absolutely no understanding of the financial meltdown that occurred. No one, I repeat, NO ONE harassed banks into making risking loans. Furthermore, CRA loans had nothing to do with the sub-prime crisis. CRA loans were made to qualifying low income individuals using conforming lending practices. You obviously know nothing about lending practices either. Sub-prime loans were what precipitated the current crisis. Banks made them with with reckless abandon to anyone that applied for them. Banks are the experts in the transaction, not the borrowers. They chose not to underwrite those loans by conventional standards because it allowed them to make piles and piles of profit. Greed caused this crisis and it is pathetic of you and the rest of your far right creed to attempt to smear the poor!

Next time you post, use some facts first. Perhaps you could ask an adult to explain what they are too. While you're at it, ask an adult to explain economics to you too. You seem to know as much about it as McBush does!

JB of MI 10:09PM October 20, 2008

Time Magazine doesn't have comments for the articles there. I used to subscribe to US N&WR. The magazine seemed more objective then. It was one of the few objective news sources that didn't bash Ronald Reagan.

David Crittenden of CA 12:41AM October 20, 2008

It is one sided like the main stream media

Perhaps the webmasters and spinsters here should read up on journalism ethics

David Crittenden of CA 12:22AM October 20, 2008

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos