Evangelicals Say Palin's Daughter Won't Be an Issue

A panel of evangelical leaders debates the Christian vote

September 1, 2008 RSS Feed Print

ST. PAUL—Less than two hours after expected Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and her husband announced that their unmarried 17-year-old daughter is pregnant, evangelical leaders told U.S. News that they don't believe the revelation will harm the GOP ticket within the conservative faith community.

"I don't think it [hurts] at all," said Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, who hailed Palin's nomination.

The media's breathless reaction is proof that "you just don't get it," Land said during a U.S. News lunch roundtable here that also included Jim Wallis, president and executive director of Sojourners; Randy Brinson, founder of Redeem the Vote; and Chuck Donovan, executive vice president for the Family Research Council.

"We need to take the Juno option," Wallis said, referring to last year's popular movie about a pregnant teenager who gives her baby up for adoption. Said Donovan: "It doesn't matter if it's a conservative, liberal, or an apolitical family—these things happen."

Donovan and Land both referred to the national efforts by evangelicals to encourage women and girls to do what Bristol Palin, now five months pregnant, has done and keep the child. "Pro-life people don't see a baby as a punishment," Land said.

Only Brinson suggested that there will be some in the evangelical community who will be disappointed by the news about Palin's daughter, even though, he said, "Sarah Palin is the one running for office."

Though the pregnancy news and that of her husband's 1986 drunken driving arrest distracted from Palin's continued roll-out today, her nomination has energized the Republican's Christian conservative base, and in particular women, Land said. "It has awakened the sisterhood," he said.

But on other issues, the evangelical community's continuing evolution—and its growing pains—were evident during the 1 ½ hour roundtable. With Wallis on the left end of the evangelical spectrum, Land and Donovan on the right, and Brinson somewhere in the middle, the men debated everything from the Democrats' abortion platform language (a step forward, said Wallis; a move to the left said Donovan) to whether Democratic nominee Barack Obama can make inroads with their communities.

Brinson suggested that the Republican three-legged coalition of economic, security, and social conservatives "doesn't exist anymore," and what has emerged is something far more complex.

"Christians are not single-issue voters," said Wallis, who was among those who worked with Democrats to add to their party's platform language that supports efforts to reduce abortion while still endorsing its legal availability. Evangelicals, particularly younger ones, have expanded their political agendas beyond abortion and same-sex marriage to issues including worldwide poverty, war, and climate change. And Obama is drawing interest from a number of young evangelical voters, Brinson said, as well as those who have been pressed by the troubled economy, the mortgage crisis, gas prices, and education concerns.

Wallis and Brinson suggested that the erosion in evangelical support for Republicans, crucial to President George Bush's 2004 win, was evident in the 2006 elections and could continue this presidential year. "A lot of evangelicals are embarrassed they voted for Bush," Wallis said.

Responded Land: "More are not."

When asked if there's anything he likes about Obama, Land said, "I like the fact that he's an African American. I like the fact that he's married to his first wife. I like the fact that he's comfortable talking about his faith."

Wallis suggested that Obama's candidacy should make happy those who value family—he has a "real family, a real marriage," one in which "kids count."

Land said that Obama is not the lighting rod that Hillary Clinton would have been, and predicted that if former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani had won the GOP nomination, half of the evangelicals that went to the polls would have picked Obama.

Bottom line, Obama could very well make inroads with the evolving evangelical community, which will still likely throw its overwhelming support to expected GOP nominee John McCain and Palin. But the transformation will continue, and this is one constituency that no side is taking for granted.

Tags:
voters,
presidential election 2008,
teen pregnancy,
evangelicals,
Sarah Palin

Reader Comments Read all comments (56)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The only aspect of the column that bothered me was the mention of "Climate Change" due to human activity. The whole theory rests upon lousy science and totally fails to explain historical climate changes. Does anyone remember reading about the ice age that carved out the great lakes and other bodies of water; the very warm climate that dominated the height of the Roman civilization or the "mini-ice age that helped Rome fall; or the warm period that followed when the Vikings settled in Greenland and refered to northern Maine and Nova Scotia as vineland; followed by yet another period of cold that set Europe back into the medievil period; followed by the Renaisance warm period that spawned the greatest explosion of thought and dreams of the essential freedom of man; which was followed by another cold period which provided the impetous for the American and French revolutions? None of these events were in anyway caused or exacerbated by the action of mankiind.

It was the comments of Shera of GA, Russ of MT, and Joe of Texas which prompted mr to write. First, the human failings, errors, and yes sins of Sarah's familly are not hers. Second, Have any of you tried to accomplish anything with a teenager? I was a fairly good kid until I got to be about 16 or 17. Things went rapidly downhill from that point. Third, what would you have had the daughter do, marry someone she didn't love just because their union had produced life? That is a lousy basis for a marriage. Finnally where is your love for people inspite of their failings? Jesus forgave many many sinners on their mere confession of sin and pledge not to do it again. I think that you may all need a spiritual house cleaning. . .

Tom of LA 10:22PM September 29, 2008

Evangelicals say, "No problem." Hmmm....and yet the Bible says at 1 Corinthians 6:9 that fornicators will not enter into the kingdom of the heavens. Yes, humans are imperfect, however, the verses go on to show this would be those practicing this. Hmmm....and yet it must have been done more than once since they have been together for a time. Still not married, still "practicing" this? Palin has made personal decisions that reflect her decision making. The daughter was younger than 17 when doing this, Palin has no control over her own household but wants to run all of ours???

Shera of GA 11:35AM September 07, 2008

It's amazing that if "we" Christians said anything about your little sin problem we would be "judging" you. But I guess it's probably to late for that. You see in the gospel of John chapter 3 it says that as an unbeleiver you stand condemned already. Don't say another word. Unless you want to repent. Jesus is listening to you too. And he will forgive, if you have a sincere heart. But if it all hate and frustration and hiding, he knows...Sorry you see us as such hypocritical people. I've been married for 14 years, never had sex before or during marriage with anyone else. You had better take your own plight serious. You and I can point the finger all we want. God will have the last word when we move on from this earth, no matter who comes into office.

Russ of MT 12:16PM September 05, 2008

advertisement

Latest Video