The Clock Is Ticking for the Clinton Campaign

I voted twice for Bill Clinton and have never been sorry. He was one our hardest working presidents and did a fair job.

This is a different election. Hillary is not Bill. The voters have asked:

Can a candidate who can't manage a campaign competently manage our government?

Do we want to be represented in the world by a president who agrees to specific rules, but after the game is over and she has lost fair and square, she would change the rules to try to make herself the winner?

Do we want a president who lies about her experiences to try to make herself appear qualified for the job?

Do we want a president who instead of facing issues and seeking solutions, whines that her failures are someone else's fault? (The biased media, those darn voters who don't like women, those "elitist" voters who are too "aloof" to vote for the candidate of the "blue collar uneducated", etc etc etc ad nauseum).

The voters have considered the qualifications of both candidates and made the right choice. We know that the life-threatening problems created by the Bush administration will not be solved by more of the same old Washington politics.

Chuck of OR 3:58PM June 04, 2008

Yes, Cindy McCain is rich, but McCain has not threatened to steal from the rich, should he become president. He likely will lower taxes, not steal money from the rich. The McCains are enjoying their riches and so should they and anyone else for that matter if they are fortunate enough to be rich. B. Hussein Obama has promised to steal from the rich and apply their money to ill-advised entitlements and welfare programs, in case of the unfortunate event he would become president.

Brits Donossian of CA 3:19PM June 03, 2008

Hold on to your pocketbooks for your dear lives, folks. If B. Hussein Obama becomes president, there will be rampant socialism in the U.S.A. B. Hussein Obama is promising "change" and indeed there will be change, but only a little of it in your pocketbooks. He will steal from the rich through excessive taxation and give to the poor, and whatever might be left will go for additional, ill-conceived entitlements and welfare programs. Meanwhile he is living off his millions he and his wife recently made. Go McCain!

Brits Donossian of CA 1:40PM June 03, 2008

MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF CLINTON DEMOCRATES WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA! HE WILL SURLY LOOSE IN GENERAL ELECTION, THANK THE BIASED CHEATING DNC WHO STOLE VOTES TO SUPPORT OBAMA!!!!

THEY PURPOSLY TOOK DELEGATES FAILRY WON BY SENATOR CLINTION AND GAVE THEM TO OBAMA!!!!

VOTE THEM OUT NEXT ELECTION!!!!

DNC Committee awarded to Senator Obama not only the delegates won by Uncommitted, but also delegates won by Senator Clinton. This decision violates the bedrock principles of our democracy and our Party.

SUPPORTERS URGE SENATOR CLINTON TO RUN AS INDEPENDENT

In general is Obama has used Poor Judgment REPEATEDLY! Obama proved Rev Wright was correct!!! Politically correct, that is. The fact that it is "painful" and took 20 years suggests he agrees with these racists "under the covers". He resigned not necessarily because he wants to but because it is the only course open to him. Imagine if the roles were reversed and John McCain had attended a white separatist church for twenty years. Would his resignation after two decades cure the concern that he had lived some sort of weird double life, cavorting with racists but talking about equal opportunity in his public life? He’d have been forced out of the presidential race by now. So the question remains: was Obama the least observant church congegrant on the planet (racism and anti-Semitism at Trinity? No!) Or a hypocrite.

WE DO NOT ACCEPT OBAMAS POLITICAL DAMAGE APOLOGY!!!

SHOCKING what Obamas really think of white folks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI77cU3jsFs

http://www.dontvoteobama.net

Kathy Kennedy of SC 7:59AM June 03, 2008