They're like the kid in the back of the classroom with his hand raised, whom the teacher never gets to call on because the other students are shouting for attention. Education activists thought that the 2008 presidential campaign would be their opportunity to make progress on the multitude of troubles besieging the nation's schools: low test scores, high dropout rates, teen violence, skyrocketing college costs. Then along came the tumbling economy, climbing gas prices, continued problems in Iraq, and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
"Education is a big issue, but I don't hear much about it, because everyone is going after the 'gotcha' of the day," says former Secretary of State Colin Powell, founder of America's Promise, which is working to draw attention to high school dropout rates. The organization recently released a study that found that the graduation rate in 17 of the nation's largest cities is less than 50 percent, a discouraging statistic in the face of increased global competition. "We need to be educating our youngsters to compete with China, India, eastern Europe, Russia, and Latin America," Powell says.
How each of the presidential candidates would attempt to improve the American school system is difficult to ascertain, given the limited dialogue on education thus far on the campaign trail. Still, there is little question that the next president will play a major role in the future of such pivotal education policies as the No Child Left Behind Act and the push for college affordability. Education experts who have examined the candidates' platforms have been able to reach a few conclusions. Presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain, who has been particularly reticent on the topic, most likely would support traditional Republican policies such as school vouchers, merit pay for teachers, and the No Child Left Behind law. While there are notable policy differences in how Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama would pursue their goals for American education, experts say the two Democratic candidates have largely similar ideas about which reforms the nation's schools ought to pursue.
Losing step. Frustration over how education has been crowded out of the presidential debate is barely contained among the nation's leading education experts. Each week seems to bring more evidence of how the United States is losing step with the rest of the developed world when it comes to educating children. Seventy percent of eighth graders are not proficient in reading, over a million high schoolers drop out each year, and nearly one third of college freshmen must take remedial math or English courses.
Recent polls suggest that the electorate would like to hear more about education—especially women, Hispanics, and young voters. Ultimately, the economy could be the catalyst that thrusts education into the campaign dialogue, experts say. After all, tomorrow's CEOs, scientists, and inventors are sitting in America's classrooms today. There already is evidence that the need for improvement is urgent: Two thirds of all new U.S. jobs require advanced training, and many U.S. companies insist they can't find enough skilled employees to fill openings without hiring foreign workers. For example, while there are nearly 100,000 new jobs annually in computer science, there has been a dramatic decline in tech graduates. As a result, the United States provides 65,000 temporary work visas each year to help make up the shortfall.
The connection between schooling and the economy is a theme echoed throughout the circles of those who seek to make education a bigger part of the campaign. "We face a future in which good jobs may not be ours if we don't fare better in educating our children," says former Colorado Gov. Roy Romer, chairman of Strong American Schools, a nonprofit funded in part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. He is charged with the tough task of encouraging the presidential contenders to elevate education in their campaign agendas. Adds Romer: "We're not where a great nation ought to be."