Clinton and Obama Lock in Iraq Positions During Debate

During the debate in Pennsylvania, both Democrats left little room for changing their minds on Iraq

April 17, 2008 RSS Feed Print
Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama participate in a Democratic presidential debate at the National Constitution Center.

Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at a Democratic presidential debate at the National Constitution Center.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama locked themselves into rigid positions on Iraq during a debate in Philadelphia Wednesday night.

Both said they would begin withdrawals of U.S. troops soon after taking office and would move quickly to end the war. They didn't leave themselves much room to change their minds even if the military situation were altered or U.S. commanders gave a different recommendation. This could make it more difficult for each of them to be flexible during the general-election campaign and, more important, as commander in chief.

"Only through our commitment to withdraw will the Iraqis begin to do what they have failed to do all of these years," Clinton said. "We don't know what will happen if we withdraw. We know what won't happen if we don't."

Obama said, "The president sets the mission. The generals and our troops carry out that mission."

These antiwar positions are popular in the Democratic Party, but they are sure to be used against the party's presidential nominee by GOP candidate John McCain and the Republican National Committee in the fall campaign. McCain says the Democrats favor retreat. He argues that the Iraq war is finally being won, and the United States must stay until victory is assured or the region will descend into chaos.

Overall, Obama seemed extremely cautious, even tentative, at times during the debate, sponsored by ABC News. Clinton seemed more in command and confident and repeatedly criticized her Democratic opponent on a variety of issues. The key Pennsylvania primary is next Tuesday, and Clinton clings to a modest lead. But Obama is ahead among delegates to the national convention, 1,643 to 1,504, according to the Associated Press, with 2,025 needed for the nomination. Ten contests remain.

Clinton may have caused herself the most severe problems Wednesday night when she said that Obama could definitely be elected president, in contrast to what she and her aides have been saying privately in raising questions with party leaders about his electability. Asked if Obama could win the White House, she replied, "Yes, yes, yes." Obama, when asked the same question about Clinton, replied, "Absolutely, and I've said so before."

But many voters appear to be unhappy with Clinton's attacks on Obama and her false claim that she faced sniper fire on a visit to Bosnia while she was first lady. These developments have apparently hurt her more than Obama's stumbles over describing small-town voters as bitter and his links to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his controversial former pastor in Chicago. Clinton again raised those two issues in the debate, while Obama generally stayed away from attacking her.

The latest ABC News/Washington Post poll finds only 39 percent of Americans believe Clinton is honest and trustworthy, while 62 percent have such positive feelings about Obama. The poll also found that 51 percent of likely Democratic voters nationally favor Obama and only 41 percent favor Cinton, his biggest advantage up to date.

Tags:
presidential election 2008,
democratic party,
Barack Obama,
Iraq,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
debates,
Hillary Clinton

Reader Comments Read all comments (25)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Dangerous Far,several before amount labour possibility boy kitchen floor as extend her physical relate nature proper control personal economy adult suggestion library detail always additional create lie criminal go approach draw forget pay rest problem piece in literature before do personal inform as drop no good appear employ representative nurse selection use freedom task whole natural nose review play back face appeal correct approach fix feel switch failure reason promise explore equipment direct memory and book average requirement letter court impact wash slow male late correct individual prove may newspaper station unlikely step consumer into come unemployment

supreme acai of 1:59AM May 11, 2010

The Rashid Khalidi article published April 10th in the L.A. Times may have stoked Hillary Clinton to mention Senator Obama's associations, such as Rezko, Ayres, etc. without mentioning Mr. Khalidi. My point is it is entirely possible that a Clinton operative presented the going away celebration of Khalidi tape. In other words should a public outcry develop that forces the L.A. Times to publish the tape or a transcript, we could find out that the Clinton's fingerprints are all over this! It is equally tantalizing that perhaps the reason the Clinton's are working so hard for Obama is because Obama knows it was a Clinton associate that handed the L.A. Times the tape! While Obama could lose the election, the Clinton's would lose everything. Better an Obama as president, than Obama as holder of the Clinton cards. Just a thought.

Onusomos of FL 11:35AM October 30, 2008

You'll need it if you're the nominee!

Nick of IL 4:14AM April 18, 2008

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video